Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds

Summary1.We tested the long-standing hypothesis that female frogs are attracted to the sound of a chorus of conspecific males from a distance. We studied the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa) because the location of choruses is unpredictable; thus, chorus sound indicates the presence of conspecific males as well as the location of a suitable breeding site.2.We measured the sound pressure level (SPL in dB re 20 μPa) in the 500 Hz octave band at various distances from choruses. The primary spectral peak in the advertisement call of this species is 400–500 Hz.3.The pattern of chorus sound attenuation in the 500 Hz band at two different sites was very similar and generally followed the pattern expected from geometrical spreading from a point source (Fig. 3). At one of the sites the SPL measured near ground level was always higher than that at a point 1 m above the ground (Fig. 3).4.Spectral analyses of the chorus sound at different distances showed that the low-frequency spectral peak in the range of 400–500 Hz was a prominent component, especially at 80–160 m (Figs. 1, 4). Amplitude peaks that corresponded to individual calls ofH. gratiosa and other species were also evident in oscillograms of recordings made at 160 m (Fig. 1).5.Gravid females oriented and moved toward a source of conspecific chorus sounds (originally recorded at 160 m from the pond) played back at 38–40 dB SPL in the 500 Hz octave band (Fig. 1, Table 1). Background noise levels were 43–47 dB SPL (C-weighted) and 24–25 dB SPL in the 500 Hz octave band.6.In a two-stimulus, choice experiment, females ofH. gratiosa always chose the source of a mixed chorus (H. gratiosa andH. cinerea) sound with conspecific males to a source of a pure chorus sound ofH. cinerea (Fig. 2, Table 2).

[1]  R. S. Oldham SPRING MOVEMENTS IN THE AMERICAN TOAD, BUFO AMERICANUS , 1966 .

[2]  S. Salthe,et al.  5 – REPRODUCTIVE AND COURTSHIP PATTERNS , 1974 .

[3]  H. Gerhardt Mating call recognition in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa): Responses to synthetic calls and comparisons with the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[4]  Cynthia F. Moss,et al.  Frequency selectivity of hearing in the green treefrog,Hyla cinerea , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  T. Macan,et al.  The Frog@@@The Ecology and Life History of the Common Frog , 1962 .

[6]  R. Savage The ecology and life history of the common frog : (Rana temporaria temporaria) , 1962 .

[7]  H. F. Landreth,et al.  Celestial Orientation of Fowler's Toad b uFo Fowleri , 1966 .

[8]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Behavioral Isolating Mechanisms of the Treefrogs Hyla cinerea and H. gratiosa , 1975 .

[9]  S. A. Perrill,et al.  Multiple Egg Clutches in Hyla regilla, H. cinerea and H. gratiosa , 1983 .

[10]  Günter Ehret,et al.  Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  R. Wiley,et al.  Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  B. Moore Frequency Selectivity in Hearing , 1987 .

[13]  D. Griffin,et al.  Sounds audible to migrating birds , 1974 .

[14]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Accuracy of phonotaxis by the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  H. Heusser Über Die Beziehungen Der Erdkröte (Bufo Bufo L.) Zu Ihrem Laichplatz Ii , 1958 .

[16]  J. E. Piercy,et al.  Outdoor sound propagation over ground of finite impedance , 1976 .

[17]  R. S. Oldham Orienting Mechanisms of the Green Frog, Rana Clamitans , 1967 .

[18]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[19]  K. Wells The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.