Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions

We present a new multiple criteria sorting method that aims at assigning actions evaluated on multiple criteria to p pre-defined and ordered classes. The preference information supplied by the decision maker (DM) is a set of assignment examples on a subset of actions relatively well known to the DM. These actions are called reference actions. Each assignment example specifies a desired assignment of a corresponding reference action to one or several contiguous classes. The set of assignment examples is used to build a preference model of the DM represented by a set of general additive value functions compatible with the assignment examples. For each action a, the method computes two kinds of assignments to classes, concordant with the DM's preference model: the necessary assignment and the possible assignment. The necessary assignment specifies the range of classes to which the action can be assigned considering all compatible value functions simultaneously. The possible assignment specifies, in turn, the range of classes to which the action can be assigned considering any compatible value function individually. The compatible value functions and the necessary and possible assignments are computed through the resolution of linear programs.

[1]  Eduardo Fernández,et al.  A new approach to multi-criteria sorting based on fuzzy outranking relations: The THESEUS method , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[4]  Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze,et al.  An Application of the UTA Discriminant Model for the Evaluation of R & D Projects , 1995 .

[5]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  The Possible and the Necessary for Multiple Criteria Group Decision , 2009, ADT.

[6]  Milosz Kadzinski,et al.  ELECTREGKMS: Robust ordinal regression for outranking methods , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[10]  Murat Köksalan,et al.  An interactive sorting method for additive utility functions , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  C. Zopounidis,et al.  Building additive utilities for multi-group hierarchical discrimination: the M.H.Dis method , 2000 .

[12]  Juscelino Almeida Dias,et al.  A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: The Electre Tri-nC method , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  PREFDIS: a multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Advances in multicriteria analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Assessing financial distress where bankruptcy is not an option: An alternative approach for local municipalities , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Murat Köksalan,et al.  An interactive approach for placing alternatives in preference classes , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..