Semantic Gap Detection in Metadata of Adaptive Learning Environments

Quality of learning objects metadata, in many respects, defines the quality of an adaptive learning environment presenting these learning objects to a student. Metadata inconsistencies and gaps may be the cause of various problems: from a system malfunction to ineffective learning experiences. In this paper, we propose an intelligent and rigorous mechanism for detecting metadata gaps in collections of learning content. The mechanism converts learning objects metadata into an OWL2 ontology, detects logical conflicts using Semantic Web reasoning techniques and generates human-readable explanations for an author to resolve the gaps. The evaluation of the developed semantic gap detection tool with real learning content collections demonstrates its effectiveness.

[1]  José A. Pino,et al.  Taking advantage of metadata semantics: the case of learning-object-based lesson graphs , 2009, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Inside Theory-Aware and Standards-Compliant Authoring System , 2007 .

[3]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Automatic metadata generation using associative networks , 2008, TOIS.

[4]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Using Ontologies to Author Constraint-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2009, Semantic Web Technologies for e-Learning.

[5]  Michael Kohlhase,et al.  MathDox : mathematical documents on the web , 2006 .

[6]  Erica Melis,et al.  Gap Detection in Web-Based Adaptive Educational Systems , 2010, ICWL.

[7]  Paul Libbrecht,et al.  ActiveMath: A Generic and Adaptive Web-Based Learning Environment , 2001 .

[8]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptation "in the Wild": Ontology-Based Personalization of Open-Corpus Learning Material , 2012, EC-TEL.

[9]  Tom Murray,et al.  An Overview of Intelligent Tutoring System Authoring Tools: Updated Analysis of the State of the Art , 2003 .

[10]  Ana Arruarte Lasa,et al.  Evaluating the Automatic Extraction of Learning Objects from Electronic Textbooks Using ErauzOnt , 2012, ITS.

[11]  Catherine Dolbear,et al.  Rabbit to OWL: Ontology Authoring with a CNL-Based Tool , 2009, CNL.

[12]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  Ontology-Based Semantic Metadata Validation , 2002 .

[13]  Michael Kohlhase,et al.  OMDoc - An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents [version 1.2] , 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  Explaining Inconsistencies in OWL Ontologies , 2009, SUM.

[16]  Gary Geisler,et al.  Creating virtual collections in digital libraries: benefits and implementation issues , 2002, JCDL '02.

[17]  José A. Pino,et al.  Enhancing Educational-Material Retrieval Using Authored-Lesson Metadata , 2007, SPIRE.