A graphical user interface for numerical modeling of acclimation responses of vegetation to climate change

Ecophysiological models that vertically resolve vegetation canopy states are becoming a powerful tool for studying the exchange of mass, energy, and momentum between the land surface and the atmosphere. A mechanistic multilayer canopy-soil-root system model (MLCan) developed by Drewry et al. (2010a) has been used to capture the emergent vegetation responses to elevated atmospheric CO"2 for both C"3 and C"4 plants under various climate conditions. However, processing input data and setting up such a model can be time-consuming and error-prone. In this paper, a graphical user interface that has been developed for MLCan is presented. The design of this interface aims to provide visualization capabilities and interactive support for processing input meteorological forcing data and vegetation parameter values to facilitate the use of this model. In addition, the interface also provides graphical tools for analyzing the forcing data and simulated numerical results. The model and its interface are both written in the MATLAB programming language. Finally, an application of this model package for capturing the ecohydrological responses of three bioenergy crops (maize, miscanthus, and switchgrass) to local environmental drivers at two different sites in the Midwestern United States is presented.

[1]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[2]  K. Wilson,et al.  How the environment, canopy structure and canopy physiological functioning influence carbon, water and energy fluxes of a temperate broad-leaved deciduous forest--an assessment with the biophysical model CANOAK. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[3]  C. W. Wood,et al.  Soil management impacts on soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass , 2000 .

[4]  Frank Ewert,et al.  Modelling plant responses to elevated CO2: how important is leaf area index? , 2004, Annals of botany.

[5]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below‐ground/above‐ground allometries of plants in water‐limited ecosystems , 2002 .

[6]  Darren T. Drewry,et al.  Implications for the hydrologic cycle under climate change due to the expansion of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  H. Mooney,et al.  Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere , 1997, Science.

[8]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  The Effect of Vegetation Density on Canopy Sub-Layer Turbulence , 2004 .

[9]  Christopher B Field,et al.  Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  L. Schulte,et al.  Soil Carbon Storage , 2012 .

[11]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 2. Role of acclimation under elevated CO2 , 2010 .

[12]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[13]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem,et al.  Biomass and Bioenergy , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[14]  D. Durran.  Numerical methods for wave equations in geophysical fluid dynamics , 1999 .

[15]  H. Griffiths,et al.  Bundle Sheath Leakiness and Light Limitation during C4 Leaf and Canopy CO2 Uptake1[W][OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[16]  A. Monti,et al.  Root distribution and soil moisture retrieval in perennial and annual energy crops in Northern Italy , 2009 .

[17]  Arana,et al.  Progress in Photosynthesis Research , 1987, Springer Netherlands.

[18]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[19]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Competitive and mutualistic dependencies in multispecies vegetation dynamics enabled by hydraulic redistribution , 2012 .

[20]  Eric E. Small,et al.  Tight coupling between soil moisture and the surface radiation budget in semiarid environments: Implications for land‐atmosphere interactions , 2003 .

[21]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[22]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport , 2007 .

[23]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Ecohydrological responses of dense canopies to environmental variability: 1. Interplay between vertical structure and photosynthetic pathway , 2010 .

[24]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus , 2007 .

[25]  Christophe Sanz,et al.  ONE- and TWO-Equation Models for Canopy Turbulence , 2004 .

[26]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[27]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Sensitivity of ground heat flux to vegetation cover fraction and leaf area index , 1999 .

[28]  K. A. Stewart,et al.  Leaf Area Development, Light Interception, and Yield among Switchgrass Populations in a Short-Season Area , 1998 .

[29]  R. B. Mitchell,et al.  Soil Carbon Storage by Switchgrass Grown for Bioenergy , 2008, BioEnergy Research.

[30]  J. R. Hess,et al.  Roadmap for Agriculture Biomass Feedstock Supply in the United States , 2003 .