Need for CT-based bone density modelling in finite element analysis of a shoulder arthroplasty revealed through a novel method for result analysis

Abstract Treatment of common pathologies of the shoulder complex, such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis, is usually performed by total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Survival of the glenoid component is still a problem in TSA, whereas the humeral component is rarely subject to failure. To set up a finite element analysis (FEA) for simulation of a TSA in order to gain insight into the mechanical behaviour of a glenoid implant, the modelling procedure and the application of boundary conditions are of major importance because the computed result strongly depends upon the accuracy and sense of realism of the model. The goal of this study was to show the influence on glenoid stress distribution of a patient-specific bone density distribution compared with a homogenous bone density distribution for the purpose of generating a valid model in future FEA studies of the shoulder complex. Detailed information on the integration of bone density properties using existing numerical models as well as the applied boundary conditions is provided. A novel approach involving statistical analysis of values derived from an FEA is demonstrated using a cumulative distribution function. The results show well the mechanically superior behaviour of a realistic bone density distribution and therefore emphasise the necessity for patient-specific simulations in biomechanical and medical simulations.

[1]  P. Büchler,et al.  Benefits of an anatomical reconstruction of the humeral head during shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Influence of Glenohumeral Prosthetic Mismatch on Glenoid Radiolucent Lines: Results of a Multicenter Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  Jay L. Devore,et al.  Modern Mathematical Statistics with Applications , 2021, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[4]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Structural analysis of an offset-keel design glenoid component compared with a center-keel design. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  P. Büchler,et al.  Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  A Rohlmann,et al.  In vivo glenohumeral contact forces--measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D. Pichora,et al.  Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Loew,et al.  Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  R. J. Pawluk,et al.  Quantitation of in situ contact areas at the glenohumeral joint: A biomechanical study , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  P F Leyvraz,et al.  The fixation of the cemented femoral component. Effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  D R Pichora,et al.  Shoulder prosthesis subluxation: theory and experiment. , 2000, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[12]  J. O. Søjbjerg,et al.  Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[13]  R. Darmana,et al.  Anatomic variation of the mechanical properties of the glenoid. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  Alain Farron,et al.  Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty: A finite element investigation , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Kamal I. Bohsali,et al.  Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  P. Büchler,et al.  A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P. Mansat Mid-term survivorship analysis of a shoulder replacement with a keeled glenoid and a modern cementing technique , 2010 .

[20]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  F. Linde,et al.  X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Sanjay Gupta,et al.  BONE GEOMETRY AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN SCAPULA USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DATA , 2004 .

[23]  R. Darmana,et al.  In vivo characterization of glenoid with use of computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[24]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Stress analysis of glenoid component designs for shoulder arthroplasty , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[28]  J. Lynch,et al.  Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  R. Cofield,et al.  Shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty-five years or younger with osteoarthritis. , 2011, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[30]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Micro-mechanical modeling of the cement-bone interface: the effect of friction, morphology and material properties on the micromechanical response. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  R. Cofield,et al.  Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.