Yields of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum decline with stand age in the Midwestern USA

For the C4 perennial grasses, Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) to be successful for bioenergy production they must maintain high yields over the long term. Previous studies under the less conducive climate for productivity in N.W. Europe found little or no yield decline in M. × giganteus in the long term. This study provides the first analysis of whether yield decline occurs in M. × giganteus under United States. Midwest conditions in side‐by‐side trials with P. virgatum over 8–10 years at seven locations across Illinois. The effect of stand age was determined by using a linear regression model that included effects of weather. Miscanthus × giganteus produced yields more than twice that of P. virgatum averaging 23.4 ± 1.2 Mg ha−1 yr−1 and 10.0 ± 0.9 Mg ha−1 yr−1, respectively, averaged over 8–10 years. Relationships of yield with precipitation and growing degree days were established and used to estimate yields corrected for the stochastic effects of weather. Across all locations and in both species, yield initially increased until it reached a maximum during the fifth growing season and then declined to a stable, but lower level in the eighth. This pattern was more pronounced in M. × giganteus. The mean yields observed over this longer term period of 8–10 years were lower than the yields of the first 5 years. However, this decline was proportionately greater in M. × giganteus than in P. virgatum, suggesting a stronger effect of stand age on M. × giganteus. Based on the average yield over the period of this study, meeting the United States Renewable Fuel Standard mandate of 60 billion liters of cellulosic ethanol by 2022, would require 6.8 Mha of M. × giganteus or 15.8 Mha of P. virgatum. These appear manageable numbers for the United States, given the 16.0 Mha in the farmland Conservation Reserve Program in addition to another 13.0 Mha abandoned from agriculture in the last decade.

[1]  A. Faaij,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term , 2005 .

[2]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  More Productive Than Maize in the Midwest: How Does Miscanthus Do It?1[W][OA] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[3]  Peter J. Thorburn,et al.  Growth and function of the sugarcane root system , 2005 .

[4]  R. Heim A Review of Twentieth-Century Drought Indices Used in the United States , 2002 .

[5]  J. Fike,et al.  The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels , 2005 .

[6]  J. Greef,et al.  Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deu , 1993 .

[7]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. , 2005 .

[8]  David A. Blowers,et al.  Low growth temperatures modify the efficiency of light use by photosystem II for CO2 assimilation in leaves of two chilling-tolerant C4 species, Cyperus longus L. and Miscanthus x giganteus. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[9]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  A semimechanistic model predicting the growth and production of the bioenergy crop Miscanthus×giganteus: description, parameterization and validation , 2009 .

[10]  M. Bullard Economics of Miscanthus Production , 2013 .

[11]  M. Gray,et al.  Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Are Potential Pathogens of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum Used for Biofuels. , 2011, Plant disease.

[12]  Andrew B. Riche,et al.  Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus × giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successive harvests , 2008 .

[13]  Michael E. Gray,et al.  Distribution, morphological description, and molecular characterization of Xiphinema and Longidorous spp. associated with plants (Miscanthus spp. and Panicum virgatum) used for biofuels , 2009 .

[14]  D. G. Christian,et al.  Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe , 2001 .

[15]  H. Zub,et al.  Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[16]  I. Linde-Laursen,et al.  Cytogenetic Analysis of Miscanthus‘Giganteus’, an Interspecific Hybrid , 2004 .

[17]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois , 2004 .

[18]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance , 2009 .

[19]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus × giganteus growth and biomass production , 2008 .

[20]  K. Moore,et al.  Genotype Effects and Genotype by Environment Interactions for Traits of Elite Switchgrass Populations , 1995 .

[21]  D. D. Wolf,et al.  Switchgrass production for the upper southeastern USA: Influence of cultivar and cutting frequency on biomass yields , 2006 .

[22]  Trevor R. Hodkinson,et al.  Nomenclature of Miscanthus x giganteus (Poaceae) , 2001 .

[23]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors , 2010 .

[24]  J. Scurlock,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[25]  Anil Kumar Singh,et al.  Cultural-practice packages and trash management effects on sugarcane ratoons under sub-tropical climatic conditions of India , 2011, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus×giganteus and Panicum virgatum , 2009 .

[27]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  The thermal response of leaf extension rate in genotypes of the C4-grass Miscanthus: an important factor in determining the potential productivity of different genotypes , 1997 .

[28]  Wayne C. Palmer,et al.  Keeping Track of Crop Moisture Conditions, Nationwide: The New Crop Moisture Index , 1968 .

[29]  F. Dohleman,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of above‐ and below‐ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons , 2012 .

[30]  Scott A. Staggenborg,et al.  Performance of Annual and Perennial Biofuel Crops: Nutrient Removal during the First Two Years , 2010 .

[31]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates , 1995 .

[32]  Evan H. DeLucia,et al.  Comparative Biogeochemical Cycles of Bioenergy Crops Reveal Nitrogen-Fixation and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Miscanthus × giganteus Agro-Ecosystem , 2010, Ecosystems.

[33]  A. Hastings,et al.  The development of MISCANFOR, a new Miscanthus crop growth model: towards more robust yield predictions under different climatic and soil conditions , 2009 .

[34]  C. Bradley,et al.  Application of sequence-independent amplification (SIA) for the identification of RNA viruses in bioenergy crops. , 2010, Journal of virological methods.

[35]  Stephen J. Del Grosso,et al.  Impact of second‐generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse‐gas emissions in the corn‐growing regions of the US , 2012 .

[36]  Simone Graeff-Hönninger,et al.  Long‐term yield and performance of 15 different Miscanthus genotypes in southwest Germany , 2012 .

[37]  M. Casler,et al.  Cultivar × Environment Interactions in Switchgrass , 2003 .

[38]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[39]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides , 1997 .

[40]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States , 2012 .

[41]  L. Wright,et al.  Switchgrass selection as a "model" bioenergy crop: A history of the process , 2010 .

[42]  Jean-Francois Lamarque,et al.  NITROGEN DEPOSITION ONTO THE UNITED STATES AND WESTERN EUROPE: SYNTHESIS OF OBSERVATIONS AND MODELS , 2005 .

[43]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[44]  G. Bollero,et al.  The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review , 2009 .

[45]  J. Juvik,et al.  Genome Size of Three Miscanthus Species , 2009, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[46]  J. T. Green,et al.  Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. , 2006 .

[47]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[48]  E. L. Rice,et al.  CAUSES OF DECREASES IN PRODUCTIVITY IN UNDISTURBED TALL GRASS PRAIRIE , 1978 .

[49]  Andrew B. Riche,et al.  Establishing Miscanthus sinensis from seed using conventional sowing methods , 2005 .

[50]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus , 2007 .