“Crowding” in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C’s

[1]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[2]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[4]  R. Hess,et al.  A preliminary report of acuity and contour interactions across the amblyope's visual field , 1979, Vision Research.

[5]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[7]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Equivalent intrinsic blur in amblyopia , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier acuity , 1994, Vision Research.

[10]  Bettina L. Beard,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in amblyopia , 1994, Vision Research.

[11]  C. Baker,et al.  Envelope-responsive neurons in areas 17 and 18 of cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[14]  D Whitaker,et al.  Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  V. M. Bondarko,et al.  What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C? , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  L N Thibos,et al.  Sampling limits and critical bandwidth for letter discrimination in peripheral vision. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  I Mareschal,et al.  Cortical processing of second-order motion , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[19]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: evidence for a template model for Vernier acuity , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  R F Hess,et al.  Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Undercounting features and missing features: evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Robert F Hess,et al.  The foveal ‘crowding’ effect: physics or physiology? , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  R F Hess,et al.  Contour interaction for an easily resolvable stimulus. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  D. Levi,et al.  Is second-order spatial loss in amblyopia explained by the loss of first-order spatial input? , 2001, Vision Research.

[26]  Can the amplitude difference spectrum peak frequency explain the foveal crowding effect? , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection , 2001, Vision Research.

[29]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size , 2002, Vision Research.

[31]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[33]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[34]  R. Hess,et al.  Foveal contrast thresholds exhibit spatial-frequency- and polarity-specific contour interactions. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.