Cd2+∕NH3-treatment of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2: Impact on the properties of ZnO layers deposited by the ion layer gas reaction method

Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2- (“CIGSSe”) based solar cells with a ZnO layer deposited by the ion layer gas reaction (ILGAR) method yield superior efficiencies (15.0%) than the references with a chemical bath-deposited CdS buffer (14.1%). However, this high performance is only reached if the absorber is pretreated in a Cd2+- and aqueous ammonia-containing bath prior to the ILGAR-ZnO deposition. The photovoltaic as well as the dark device parameters are strongly influenced by this treatment. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as well as x-ray diffraction measurements reveal a different morphology and structure of ILGAR-ZnO layers on top of Cd2+∕NH3-treated and on as-deposited absorbers, indicating a considerably modified absorber surface. By energy dispersive x-ray analysis in the TEM, Cd could only be identified at the ILGAR-ZnO∕Cd2+∕NH3-treated-CIGSSe interface of the respective cross sections, if the absorber was treated in a bath with an atypically high Cd2+-concentration. In this case a Cd-contain...

[1]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Determination of the band gap depth profile of the penternary Cu(In(1−X)GaX)(SYSe(1−Y))2 chalcopyrite from its composition gradient , 2004 .

[2]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 23) , 2004 .

[3]  Rommel Noufi,et al.  Properties of 19.2% efficiency ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 thin‐film solar cells , 2003 .

[4]  E. Umbach,et al.  Impact of Cd2+-treatment on the band alignment at the ILGAR-ZnO/CuIn(S,Se)2 heterojunction , 2003 .

[5]  A. Rockett,et al.  Near-surface defect distributions in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 , 2003 .

[6]  E. Umbach,et al.  CdS and Cd(OH)2 formation during Cd treatments of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin-film solar cell absorbers , 2003 .

[7]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Replacement of the CBD-CdS buffer and the sputtered i-ZnO layer by an ILGAR-ZnO WEL: optimization of the WEL deposition , 2003 .

[8]  M. Bär,et al.  ILGAR‐ZnO Window Extension Layer: an adequate substitution of the conventional CBD‐CdS buffer in Cu(In,Ga) (S,Se)2‐based solar cells with superior device performance , 2002 .

[9]  M. Bär,et al.  Ion layer gas reaction (ILGAR): conversion, thermodynamic considerations and related FTIR analyses , 2002 .

[10]  Wolfgang Riedl,et al.  Rapid CIS-process for high efficiency PV-modules: development towards large area processing , 2001 .

[11]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  ILGAR technology IV : ILGAR thin film technology extended to metal oxides , 2001 .

[12]  L. Kronik,et al.  Interface redox engineering of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 – based solar cells: oxygen, sodium, and chemical bath effects ☆ , 2000 .

[13]  T. Nakada.  Nano-structural investigations on Cd-doping into Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films by chemical bath deposition process , 2000 .

[14]  H. Schock,et al.  Wet treatment based interface engineering for high efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2000 .

[15]  A. Kylner.  The Chemical Bath Deposited CdS / Cu ( In , Ga ) Se2 Interface as Revealed by X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 1999 .

[16]  T. Nakada,et al.  Direct evidence of Cd diffusion into Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin films during chemical-bath deposition process of CdS films , 1999 .

[17]  C. Bostedt,et al.  Observation of intermixing at the buried CdS/Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin film solar cell heterojunction , 1999 .

[18]  H. Schock,et al.  Scalability and pilot operation in solar cells of CuInSe2 and their alloys , 1998 .

[19]  J. Herrero,et al.  Dependence of Electro‐optical Properties on the Deposition Conditions of Chemical Bath Deposited CdS Thin Films , 1997 .

[20]  S. Abrahams,et al.  Atomic displacement, anharmonic thermal vibration, expansivity and pyroelectric coefficient thermal dependences in ZnO , 1989 .