Modelling and evaluation of PEM hydrogen technologies for frequency ancillary services in future multi-energy sustainable power systems

This paper examines the prospect of PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) electrolyzers and fuel cells to partake in European electrical ancillary services markets. First, the current framework of ancillary services is reviewed and discussed, emphasizing the ongoing European harmonization plans for future frequency balancing markets. Next, the technical characteristics of PEM hydrogen technologies and their potential uses within the electrical power system are discussed to evaluate their adequacy to the requirements of ancillary services markets. Last, a case study based on a realistic representation of the transmission grid in the north of the Netherlands for the year 2030 is presented. The main goal of this case study is to ascertain the effectiveness of PEM electrolyzers and fuel cells for the provision of primary frequency reserves. Dynamic generic models suitable for grid simulations are developed for both technologies, including the required controllers to enable participation in ancillary services markets. The obtained results show that PEM hydrogen technologies can improve the frequency response when compared to the procurement with synchronous generators of the same reserve value. Moreover, the fast dynamics of PEM electrolyzers and fuel cells can help mitigate the negative effects attributed to the reduction of inertia in the system.

[1]  J.A. Ferreira,et al.  Primary power/frequency control with wind turbines and fuel cells , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[2]  R. O’Hayre,et al.  Fuel Cell Fundamentals , 2005 .

[3]  José Manuel Andújar,et al.  A suitable model plant for control of the set fuel cell−DC/DC converter , 2008 .

[4]  Pablo Sanchis,et al.  Modelling of PEM fuel cell performance: steady-state and dynamic experimental validation , 2014 .

[5]  Jari Pennanen,et al.  Power ramp rate capabilities of a 5 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell system with discrete ejector control , 2018 .

[6]  Tine Konjedic,et al.  Identification of a Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell’s Model Parameters by Means of an Evolution Strategy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[7]  Jarosław Milewski,et al.  Comparative analysis of time constants in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell processes - selection of key processes for modeling power systems , 2011 .

[8]  Marcos V. Moreira,et al.  A practical model for evaluating the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2009 .

[9]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[10]  Kevin Harrison,et al.  Novel Electrolyzer Applications: Providing More Than Just Hydrogen , 2014 .

[11]  Sandra Curtin,et al.  State of the States: Fuel Cells in America , 2010 .

[12]  M.H. Nehrir,et al.  Dynamic models and model validation for PEM fuel cells using electrical circuits , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[13]  J. C. Amphlett,et al.  A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1996 .

[14]  Ram B. Gupta.  Hydrogen Fuel : Production, Transport, and Storage , 2008 .

[15]  José Luis Rueda Torres,et al.  Demand Side Response in Multi-Energy Sustainable Systems to Support Power System Stability , 2017 .

[16]  Mehdi Soltani,et al.  Development of an empirical dynamic model for a Nexa PEM fuel cell power module , 2010 .

[17]  A.M. Khambadkone,et al.  A hybrid model with combined steady-state and dynamic characteristics of PEMFC fuel cell stack , 2005, Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005..

[18]  Paul Breeze.  The Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell , 2017 .

[19]  Saad Mekhilef,et al.  Comparative study of different fuel cell technologies , 2012 .

[20]  A. Hawkes,et al.  Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study , 2017 .

[21]  Michele Dassisti,et al.  Fuel Cell Technologies, Applications, and State of the Art. A Reference Guide , 2020, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering.

[22]  Donghoon Shin,et al.  A simple dynamic model for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) power modules: Parameter estimation and model prediction , 2010 .

[23]  S. Rowshanzamir,et al.  Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications , 2010 .

[24]  M.A.M.M. van der Meijden,et al.  Modelling of Large Size Electrolyzer for Electrical Grid Stability Studies in Real Time Digital Simulation , 2018 .

[25]  S. Morozumi,et al.  Micro-grid Demonstration Projects in Japan , 2007, 2007 Power Conversion Conference - Nagoya.

[26]  Zhihua Yang,et al.  An improved dynamic voltage model of PEM fuel cell stack , 2010 .

[27]  Johannes Töpler,et al.  Hydrogen and fuel cell : technologies and market perspectives , 2015 .

[28]  David M. Wall,et al.  The potential of power to gas to provide green gas utilising existing CO2 sources from industries, distilleries and wastewater treatment facilities , 2017 .

[29]  Niancheng Zhou,et al.  Modelling and control of solid oxide fuel cell generation system in microgrid , 2017 .

[30]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Recent advances and challenges of fuel cell based power system architectures and control – A review , 2017 .

[31]  John Lygeros,et al.  Modeling for optimal operation of PEM fuel cells and electrolyzers , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC).

[32]  José L. Rueda Torres,et al.  Integration of Power-to-Gas Conversion into Dutch Electrical Ancillary Services Markets , 2018 .

[33]  Prakash C. Ghosh.  High platinum cost: obstacle or blessing for commercialization of low-temperature fuel cell technologies , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[34]  Jennifer Gangi,et al.  State of the States. Fuel Cells in America 2012 , 2012 .

[35]  M. Melaina,et al.  Economic Assessment of Hydrogen Technologies Participating in California Electricity Markets , 2016 .