The Cross-National Diffusion of Work Systems: Translation of Japanese Operations in the UK

This article investigates the process of the cross-national diffusion of work systems to the affiliate firms of three Japanese multinational companies in the UK. It examines the degree to which structural, cultural, and control-related work systems of the source company are adopted by the recipient. The case studies highlight the interplay between institutional forces and organizational action through a process of work-systems translation. The study is based on a systematic comparative analysis of the ways in which Japanese work systems are implemented and sustained in the given firms. It concludes that firms attempt to translate alternative work systems rather than submit to environmental pressures toward isomorphism. The process of diffusing work systems is not driven by pre-existing legacies alone. There is room for social action in that actors, through their interaction, contribute actively to shaping the work organization.

[1]  Tammar B. Zilber,et al.  INSTITUTIONALIZATION AS AN INTERPLAY BETWEEN ACTIONS, MEANINGS, AND ACTORS: THE CASE OF A RAPE CRISIS CENTER IN ISRAEL , 2002 .

[2]  D. Faulkner.  International Strategic Alliances: Co-Operating to Compete , 1996 .

[3]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  Cognitive Style and the Theory and Practice of Individual and Collective Learning in Organizations , 1998 .

[4]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[5]  J. Laurenson.  Leadership in administration. , 1965, The New Zealand nursing journal. Kai tiaki.

[6]  T. Kostova.  Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[8]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Review Essay , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Charles J. McMillan,et al.  The Japanese Industrial System , 1984 .

[10]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Importance of Extra-Organizational Networks in the Diffusion and Appropriation of New Technologies , 1990 .

[11]  Hans Doorewaard,et al.  The Osmosis of Ideas: An Analysis of the Integrated Approach to IT Management from a Translation Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Sue Newell,et al.  Innovation and Networks: Linking Diffusion and Implementation , 1997 .

[13]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[14]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: the role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries , 2001 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge , 2003 .

[16]  Nicole Woolsey Biggart,et al.  Managing the Managers: Japanese Management Strategies in the USA , 1999 .

[17]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[18]  Peter A. Clark,et al.  Anglo-American innovation , 1987 .

[19]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[20]  Peer Hull Kristensen,et al.  The Changing European Firm: Limits to convergence , 1995 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[22]  Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Knowledge-Driven Work: Unexpected Lessons from Japanese and United States Work Practices , 1998 .

[23]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  The Japanization of British industry , 1988 .

[24]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Management in China during the age of reform , 1996 .

[25]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[26]  R. Whitley.  How and Why are International Firms Different? the consequences of cross-border managerial coordination for firm characteristics and behaviour , 2001 .

[27]  The Japanese employment system in transition , 2000 .

[28]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[29]  Marie-Laure Djelic,et al.  Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business , 1998 .

[30]  Barbara Townley,et al.  The Role of Competing Rationalities in Institutional Change , 2002 .

[31]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[32]  J. Mill.  A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive : being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. , 2011 .

[33]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Culture, Control and Commitment: A Study of Work Organization and Work Attitudes in the United States and Japan. , 1990 .

[34]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[35]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  The Japanisation of British industry , 1988 .

[36]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[37]  Brett Slieelimi.  Management in China During the Age of Reform , 1997 .

[38]  Ayse Saka.  Cross-national appropriation of work systems : Japanese firms in the UK , 2003 .

[39]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Managerial Learning in Foreign-invested Enterprises of China , 2001 .

[40]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  A. Jaeger,et al.  The Transfer of Organizational Culture Overseas: An Approach to Control in the Multinational Corporation , 1983 .

[42]  W. Scott,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL RESEARCH FORUM , 2002 .

[43]  V. Pucik,et al.  Strategic alliances, organizational learning, and competitive advantage: The HRM agenda , 1988 .

[44]  A. Grandori,et al.  Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms , 1995 .