A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries?

Perceptual rivalry is an oscillation of conscious experience that takes place despite univarying, if ambiguous, sensory input. Much current interest is focused on the controversy over the neural site of binocular rivalry, a variety of perceptual rivalry for which a number of different cortical regions have been implicated. Debate continues over the relative role of higher levels of processing compared with primary visual cortex and the suggestion that different forms of rivalry involve different cortical areas. Here we show that the temporal pattern of disappearance and reappearance in motion-induced blindness (MIB) (Bonneh et al, 2001 Nature 411 798–801) is highly correlated with the pattern of oscillation reported during binocular rivalry in the same individual. This correlation holds over a wide range of inter-individual variation. Temporal similarity in the two phenomena was strikingly confirmed by the effects of the hallucinogen LSD, which produced the same, extraordinary, pattern of increased rhythmicity in both kinds of perceptual oscillation. Furthermore, MIB demonstrates the two properties previously considered characteristic of binocular rivalry. Namely the distribution of dominance periods can be approximated by a gamma distribution and, in line with Levelt's second proposition of binocular rivalry, predominance of one perceptual phase can be increased through a reduction in the predominance time of the opposing phase. We conclude that (i) MIB is a form of perceptual rivalry, and (ii) there may be a common oscillator responsible for timing aspects of all forms of perceptual rivalry.

[1]  D. Purves,et al.  Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  P. Walker.  Binocular rivalry : Central or peripheral selective processes? , 1978 .

[3]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Meijer,et al.  Neurophysiology of the suprachiasmatic circadian pacemaker in rodents. , 1989, Physiological reviews.

[5]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W J Levelt,et al.  Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[7]  D. P. Russell,et al.  Increased Synchronization of Neuromagnetic Responses during Conscious Perception , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[9]  N. Logothetis.  Single units and conscious vision. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  J. C. Angulo,et al.  Timing and Competition in Networks Representing Ambiguous Figures , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  J. Wolfe.  Resolving perceptual ambiguity , 1996, Nature.

[13]  R. Blake.  A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[14]  S. R. Lehky.  Binocular rivalry is not chaotic , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[16]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[17]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[18]  J. Pettigrew.  Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations , 2001 .

[19]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[21]  W. Levelt.  The alternation process in binocular rivalry , 1966 .

[22]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A ‘sticky’ interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[24]  Erich W Graf,et al.  Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion , 2002, Vision Research.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[26]  M. Fahle.  Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency , 1982, Vision Research.

[27]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[28]  Randolph Blake,et al.  How Context Influences Predominance during Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Perception.

[29]  A. Karni,et al.  A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Parallel perception of multiple visually bistable patterns , 2001 .

[32]  R. Blake.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[33]  P. Walker,et al.  The Perceptual Fragmentation of Unstabilized Images , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  D Purves,et al.  Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.