Perceptual learning: tactile letter recognition transfers across body surfaces.

Visual-to-tactile sensory substitution devices are designed to assist visually impaired people by converting visual stimuli into tactile stimuli. The important claim has been made that, after training with these devices, the tactile stimuli can be moved from one body surface to another without any decrease in performance. This claim, although recurrent, has never been empirically investigated. Moreover, studies in the field of tactile perceptual learning suggest that performance improvement transfers only to body surfaces that are closely represented in the somatosensory cortex, i.e. adjacent or homologous contralateral body surfaces. These studies have however mainly used discrimination tasks of stimuli varying along only one feature (e.g., orientation of gratings) whereas, in sensory substitution, tactile information consists of more complex stimuli. The present study investigated the extent to which there is a transfer of tactile letter learning. Participants first underwent a baseline session in which the letters were presented on their belly, thigh, and shin. They were subsequently trained on only one of these body surfaces, and then re-tested on all of them, as a post-training session. The results revealed that performance improvement was the same for both the trained and the untrained surfaces. Moreover, this transfer of perceptual learning was equivalent for adjacent and non-adjacent body surfaces, suggesting that tactile learning transfer occurs independently of the distance on the body. A control study consisting of the same baseline and post-training sessions, without training in between, revealed weaker improvement between the two sessions. The obtained results support the claim that training with sensory substitution devices results in a relative independence from the stimulated body surface.

[1]  Malika Auvray,et al.  The process of distal attribution illuminated through studies of sensory substitution. , 2014, Multisensory research.

[2]  P. Haggard,et al.  Tactile perception, cortical representation and the bodily self , 2003, Current Biology.

[3]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Tactile coactivation resets age‐related decline of human tactile discrimination , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[4]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  How well do you see what you hear? The acuity of visual-to-auditory sensory substitution , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[5]  K. Sekiyama,et al.  Importance of head axes in perception of cutaneous patterns drawn on vertical body surfaces , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Somatosensory Homunculus as Drawn by MEG , 1998, NeuroImage.

[7]  K. Sathian,et al.  Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  L M Parsons,et al.  Perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns on surfaces of the human body in various positions. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Keiji Tanaka Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Yuichiro Kume,et al.  Vibrotactile letter reading using a low-resolution tactor array , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[11]  K.A. Kaczmarek,et al.  Pattern identification as a function of stimulation on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Malika Auvray,et al.  Perception With Compensatory Devices: From Sensory Substitution to Sensorimotor Extension , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Anne Bol,et al.  Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Nancy Byl,et al.  Practice-Related Improvements in Somatosensory Interval Discrimination Are Temporally Specific But Generalize across Skin Location, Hemisphere, and Modality , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Kaas,et al.  Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic area 3b and 1 in “SI” in the owl monkey (aotus trivirgatus) , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[18]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[19]  G Jansson,et al.  Tactile guidance of movement. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[20]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.5 The ‘when ’ pathway of the right parietal lobe , 2022 .

[23]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Image-to-sound conversion: experience-induced plasticity in auditory cortex of blindfolded adults , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Tactile perceptual learning: learning curves and transfer to the contralateral finger , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Ruth G. Shaw,et al.  Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview , 1993 .

[26]  S Levy-Tzedek,et al.  Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. , 2012, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[27]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Modeling perceptual learning: difficulties and how they can be overcome , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Malika Auvray,et al.  The Vibe: a versatile vision-to-audition sensory substitution device , 2010 .

[29]  Charles Spence,et al.  Topographic generalization of tactile perceptual learning. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[31]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Changes in the distributed temporal response properties of SI cortical neurons reflect improvements in performance on a temporally based tactile discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  A. Amedi,et al.  Large-Scale Brain Plasticity Following Blindness and the Use of Sensory Substitution Devices , 2010 .

[33]  David Poeppel,et al.  Learning transfer and neuronal plasticity in humans trained in tactile discrimination , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Brain plasticity: ‘visual’ acuity of blind persons via the tongue , 2001, Brain Research.

[35]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  Reading the World through the Skin and Ears: A New Perspective on Sensory Substitution , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[36]  P. Bach-y-Rita Nonsynaptic Diffusion Neurotransmission and Late Brain Reorganization , 1995 .

[37]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation , 1974 .

[38]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Topography of Tactile Learning in Humans , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  A. Iriki,et al.  Bilateral hand representation in the postcentral somatosensory cortex , 1994, Nature.

[41]  C. Trullemans,et al.  A real-time experimental prototype for enhancement of vision rehabilitation using auditory substitution , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[43]  B. Godde,et al.  Tactile Coactivation-Induced Changes in Spatial Discrimination Performance , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque,et al.  Auditory substitution of vision: pattern recognition by the blind , 2001 .