Automatic Discrimination between Scomber japonicus and Scomber australasicus by Geometric and Texture Features

This paper proposes a method for automatic discrimination of two mackerel species: Scomber japonicus (chub mackerel) and Scomber australasicus (blue mackerel). Because S. japonicus has a much higher market price than S. australasicus, the two species must be properly sorted before shipment, but their similar appearance makes discrimination difficult. These species can be effectively distinguished using the ratio of the base length between the dorsal fin’s first and ninth spines to the fork length. However, manual measurement of this ratio is time-consuming and reduces fish freshness. The proposed technique instead uses image processing to measure these lengths. We were able to successfully discriminate between the two species using the ratio as a geometric feature, in combination with several texture features. We then quantitatively verified the effectiveness of the proposed method and demonstrated that it is highly accurate in classifying mackerel.

[1]  B. Collette,et al.  Mackerel from the northern indian ocean and the red sea arescomber australasicus, notscomber japonicus , 1998, Ichthyological Research.

[2]  H. Abbass,et al.  aiNet : An Artificial Immune Network for Data Analysis , 2022 .

[3]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Fernando José Von Zuben,et al.  Adaptive Radius Immune Algorithm for Data Clustering , 2005, ICARIS.

[5]  Sadegh Abbasi,et al.  Shape similarity retrieval under affine transforms , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Flávio L. C. Pádua,et al.  Evaluating cluster detection algorithms and feature extraction techniques in automatic classification of fish species , 2013, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[7]  C. Sassa,et al.  Distribution and growth of Scomber japonicus and S. australasicus larvae in the southern East China Sea in response to oceanographic conditions. , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Pictorial Structures for Object Recognition , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[11]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  Invariant Image Recognition by Zernike Moments , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..