Measurement and prediction of post-fire erosion at the hillslope scale, Colorado Front Range

Post-fire soil erosion is of considerable concern because of the potential decline in site productivity and adverse effects on downstream resources. For the Colorado Front Range there is a paucity of post-fire erosion data and a corresponding lack of predictive models. This study measured hillslope-scale sediment production rates and site characteristics for three wild and three prescribed fires over two summers and one winter using 48 sediment fences. Over 90% of the sediment was generated by summer convective storms. Sediment production rates from recent, high-severity wildfires were 0.2-1.0 kg m −2 year −1 . Mean sediment production rates from areas recently burned at moderate and low severity were only 0.02 and 0.005 kg m −2 year −1 , respectively. For a given severity, sediment production rates from prescribed fires were generally lower than from wildfires, but there was considerable variability between plots and within fire severity classes. Fire severity, percent bare soil, rainfall erosivity, soil water repellency and soil texture explained 77% of the variability in sediment production rates, while a two-parameter model using percentage bare soil and rainfall erosivity explained 62% of the variability. Model validation confirmed the usefulness of these empirical models. The improved understanding of post-fire erosion rates can help guide forest management and post-fire rehabilitation efforts.

[1]  B. Stewart,et al.  Assessment Methods for Soil Carbon , 2000 .

[2]  C. K. Mutchler,et al.  Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation , 1987 .

[3]  W. Shepperd,et al.  Long-term, landscape patterns of past fire events in a montane ponderosa pine forest of central Colorado , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  Rorke B. Bryan,et al.  The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient. , 2000 .

[5]  D. Knighton.  Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .

[6]  L. Macdonald,et al.  Post-fire Soil Water Repellency : Persistence and Soil Moisture Thresholds , 2004 .

[7]  E. Marcos,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Runo and Sediment Yield with a Rainfall Simulator After Experimental Fire , 2000 .

[8]  H. D. Scott.  Soil physics: agricultural and environmental applications. , 2000 .

[9]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  A strategic assessment of forest biomass and fuel reduction treatments in western states , 2003 .

[10]  J. Stednick,et al.  Strength and persistence of fire‐induced soil hydrophobicity under ponderosa and lodgepole pine, Colorado Front Range , 2001 .

[11]  Peter R. Robichaud,et al.  Fire effects on infiltration rates after prescribed fire in Northern Rocky Mountain forests, USA , 2000 .

[12]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity , 2004 .

[13]  S. Doerr.  On standardizing the ‘Water Drop Penetration Time’ and the ‘Molarity of an Ethanol Droplet’ techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: A case study using medium textured soils , 1998 .

[14]  F. Pierson,et al.  Spatial and temporal effects of wildfire on the hydrology of a steep rangeland watershed , 2001 .

[15]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[16]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Ponderosa pine in the Colorado Front Range: long historical fire and tree recruitment intervals and a case for landscape heterogeneity , 2000 .

[17]  David Dunkerley,et al.  Runoff and runon areas in a patterned chenopod shrubland, arid western New South Wales, Australia: characteristics and origin , 1995 .

[18]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Heterogeneity in ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests: age and size structure in unlogged and logged landscapes of central Colorado , 2000 .

[19]  Lee H. MacDonald,et al.  Post‐fire runoff and erosion from simulated rainfall on small plots, Colorado Front Range , 2001 .

[20]  J. Moody,et al.  Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range , 2001 .

[21]  B. Stewart,et al.  Estimation of Particulate and Total Organic Matter by Weight Loss-on-Ignition , 2000 .

[22]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  Hayman Fire Case Study , 2003 .

[23]  R. Birdsey,et al.  The impact of climate change on America's forests: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. , 2000 .

[24]  M. Inbar,et al.  Runoff and erosion processes after a forest fire in Mount Carmel, a Mediterranean area , 1998 .

[25]  Robert E. Davis,et al.  Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models , 1985 .

[26]  D. Binkley,et al.  Forests and water: A state-of-the-art review for Colorado , 2003 .

[27]  R. Bryan.  Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope , 2000 .

[28]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[29]  M. M. Moore,et al.  Ponderosa pine forest reconstruction: Comparisons with historical data , 2001 .

[30]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Application of fuzzy logic-based modeling to improve the performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation , 2002 .

[31]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Cascading effects of fire exclusion in Rocky Mountain ecosystems: a literature review , 2002 .

[32]  Stephen R. Yool,et al.  Modeling potential erosion due to the Cerro Grande Fire with a GIS-based implementation of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation , 2003 .

[33]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Hydrologic modeling of small watersheds , 1982 .

[34]  I C Edmundson,et al.  Particle size analysis , 2013 .

[35]  F. Nachtergaele.  Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[36]  H. Wright,et al.  Soil Loss, Runoff, and Water Quality of Seeded and Unseeded Steep Watersheds following Prescribed Burning , 1982 .

[37]  C. T. Youngberg,et al.  The Effect of Logging and Slash-Burning on Soil Structure 1 , 1957 .

[38]  L. Debano.  Water repellent soils: a state-of-the-art , 1981 .

[39]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Predicting soil erosion by water : a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) , 1997 .

[40]  H. Gary.  Watershed management problems and opportunities for the Colorado Front Range ponderosa pine zone : the status of our knowledge / , 1975 .

[41]  Bruno CaprileIRST.  MODEL CALIBRATION , 1997 .

[42]  P. Robichaud,et al.  Effectiveness of needle cast at reducing erosion after forest fires , 2003 .

[43]  L. Macdonald,et al.  Post-fire Soil Water Repellency , 2004 .

[44]  J. Hudson.  A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[45]  H. Wright,et al.  Effect of Prescribed Burning on Sediment, Water Yield, and Water Quality from Dozed Juniper Lands in Central Texas , 1976 .

[46]  D. Breshears,et al.  Runoff and Erosion in a Piñon–Juniper Woodland Influence of Vegetation Patches , 1999 .

[47]  W. C. Schmidt,et al.  Effects of fire on flora: a state of knowledge review , 1981 .

[48]  J. Blackard,et al.  Effect of Mulching on Sediment in Runoff From Simulated Rainfall1 , 1978 .

[49]  P. Robichaud,et al.  A comparison of surface runoff and sediment yields from low- and high-severity site preparation burns , 1994 .

[50]  Using Fuzzy Logic-Based Modeling to Improve the Performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation , 2002 .

[51]  Edward H. Wiser,et al.  Stochastic Models in Hydrology , 1967 .

[52]  G. Leavesley,et al.  Quantification of precipitation measurement discontinuity induced by wind shields on national gauges , 1999 .

[53]  Frederick B. Pierson,et al.  Impacts of wildfire on soil hydrological properties of steep sagebrush-steppe rangeland , 2002 .

[54]  Vujica Yevjevich,et al.  Stochastic models in hydrology , 1987 .

[55]  I. Prosser,et al.  The effect of wildfire on runoff and erosion in native Eucalyptus forest , 1998 .

[56]  S. Morris,et al.  Forest Fire and the Natural Soil Erosion Regime in the Colorado Front Range , 1987 .