Is it possible to individually identify red foxes from photographs

The individual identification of animals from photographs is increasingly used to obtain density estimates not only for animals with distinct natural markings but also for species with little or no distinct markings, such as coyotes (Canis latrans), pumas (Puma concolor) and tapirs (Tapirus terrestris). This lack of distinct natural markings may lead to large error rates in the assessment of photographs, and as a consequence result in poor abundance estimates. We conducted an experiment asking expert observers to identify individual red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from a set of photographs taken by automatic camera-traps. Our objectives were to determine whether reliable individual identification of red foxes from photographs is possible and, if possible, to improve the identification process. Exact assessment of error rates in individual identification can only be achieved if photographs of known individuals are available. This is rarely the case; therefore, we used photographs of red foxes from different study sites and determined the lower limit of the proportion of false positive matches. Our analysis, based on 10 expert responses, suggested that individual identification of red foxes is not reliable. The number of individual foxes assessed by the observers varied between 4 and 23 individuals. The minimal proportion of false positive matches was very large (>50% of the photographs considered to be of the same individual were from 2 different study sites) and there was little agreement among experts on which photographs showed the same individuals. Hence, we caution against individual identification from photographs of red foxes and other animals with similar or less natural markings without further testing. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values , 1994, BMJ.

[2]  Chris R. Dickman,et al.  Detecting pest and prey responses to fox control across the landscape using remote cameras , 2011 .

[3]  Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos,et al.  Is it possible to individually identify mammals with no natural markings using camera-traps?A controlled case-study with lowland tapirs , 2010 .

[4]  M. Kelly,et al.  Estimating Puma Densities from Camera Trapping across Three Study Sites: Bolivia, Argentina, and Belize , 2008 .

[5]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Modeling misidentification errors that result from use of genetic tags in capture–recapture studies , 2011, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[6]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  Brazilian Tapir Density in the Pantanal: A Comparison of Systematic Camera‐Trapping and Line‐Transect Surveys , 2008 .

[7]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The use of camera traps for estimating tiger and leopard populations in the high altitude mountains of Bhutan , 2009 .

[8]  Andrew J. Noss,et al.  Camera-trap studies of maned wolf density in the Cerrado and the Pantanal of Brazil , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[9]  Rebecca J. Foster,et al.  A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data† , 2012 .

[10]  Matthew R. Schofield,et al.  Incorporating Genotype Uncertainty into Mark–Recapture‐Type Models For Estimating Abundance Using DNA Samples , 2009, Biometrics.

[11]  M. Kelly,et al.  Ocelot home range, overlap and density: comparing radio telemetry with camera trapping , 2008 .

[12]  R. Wallace,et al.  A preliminary density estimate for Andean bear using camera-trapping methods , 2007 .

[13]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Estimating survival in photographic capture–recapture studies: overcoming misidentification error , 2011 .

[14]  D L Borchers,et al.  Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture Studies , 2008, Biometrics.

[15]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Evaluation of Camera Trapping for Estimating Red Fox Abundance , 2009 .

[16]  P. Brussard,et al.  Cameras, Coyotes, and the Assumption of Equal Detectability , 2007 .

[17]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[18]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES , 1998 .

[19]  G. Garrote,et al.  Estimation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population in the Doñana area, SW Spain, using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[20]  N. Silvy,et al.  Estimating Bobcat Abundance Using Automatically Triggered Cameras , 2006 .

[21]  Marc Kéry,et al.  ESTIMATION OF OCELOT DENSITY IN THE PANTANAL USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS OF CAMERA-TRAPPING DATA , 2003 .

[22]  K. Ullas Karanth,et al.  Application of photographic capture–recapture modelling to estimate demographic parameters for male Asian elephants , 2007 .

[23]  M. Delibes,et al.  Determining the relative abundance of European red foxes by scent- station methodology , 1996 .

[24]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  A Novel Method to Improve Individual Animal Identification Based on Camera-Trapping Data , 2011 .

[25]  David L. Smith,et al.  The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals , 2001, Animal Conservation.

[26]  Raymond A. Webster,et al.  Modeling misidentification errors in capture-recapture studies using photographic identification of evolving marks. , 2009, Ecology.