Removal Efficiency and Integrity Monitoring Techniques for Virus Removal by Membrane Processes

Membranes are a mechanical form of disinfection that works by physical separation of the target pathogen. In theory, an intact membrane is a barrier to pathogens that are larger in size than the pore size of the membrane. However, in practice the pore size distribution or molecular weight cutoff will provide an indication of the separation efficiency and in many cases complete rejection of the virus is not demonstrated by various membrane processes. The general mechanism of pathogen removal by membrane processes is predominantly achieved by size exclusion, influenced by the physicochemical properties of the membrane, surface properties of the pathogens, and the solution environment. However, in order to evaluate the intrinsic performance of the membranes for a specific objective, a standard protocol with defined set of operating conditions is required. Any anomaly with the membrane surface (e.g., abnormally big pores, compromised glue line, holes) and the filtration system (e.g., compromised O-rings, broken mechanical seals) will result in microbial contamination risk of the product water. Therefore, monitoring membrane treatment system integrity is essential for the protection of public health from microbial risk. The demand for real-time monitoring is increasing as the usage of membrane-processed water is on the rise. Monitoring membrane integrity can be achieved by regular noncontinuous direct integrity testing performed on the membrane itself, or continuous indirect tests carried out on the filtrate. These monitoring techniques provide ongoing assurance that the water quality objectives are continually met. Existing integrity monitoring techniques have been shown in various instances to be reliable and sensitive for detecting contaminants of 1.0 μm and larger, while enteric virus particles are in the size range 0.01–0.04 μm. Some of the indirect monitoring techniques are capable of detecting a membrane breach less than 1 μm, but the practical challenge resolution is typically around 1–2-log. Similarly, the process control monitoring parameters lack sensitivity and therefore virus breakthrough occurs even before a loss of integrity is detected. At present it is difficult to demonstrate virus removal without conducting challenge tests due to a lack of sufficiently sensitive process monitoring. On the other hand, regulators are under increasing pressure to grant log removal credits for enteric viruses to membrane treatment processes due to the inability of present integrity tests to verify ongoing removal of virus-sized particles. Therefore, finding reliable and sensitive integrity tests for viruses is a high-priority issue in the water treatment sector. The authors aim to review the present state of knowledge on the process efficiencies of virus removal by membrane processes and the associated membrane integrity monitoring practices for virus-sized particles. Some of the knowledge gaps and research needs associated with the existing guidelines and standing protocols for integrity monitoring are also identified.

[1]  Elizabeth Arkhangelsky,et al.  Effect of transmembrane pressure on rejection of viruses by ultrafiltration membranes , 2008 .

[2]  K. Glucina,et al.  Acoustic sensor: a novel technique for low pressure membrane integrity monitoring☆ , 1998 .

[3]  T. Leiknes,et al.  The effect of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration for the removal of virus in drinking water , 2006 .

[4]  S. Chellam,et al.  Comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation pretreatment for enhanced virus removal using microfiltration membranes. , 2005, Water research.

[5]  Elizabeth Arkhangelsky,et al.  Impact of chemical cleaning on properties and functioning of polyethersulfone membranes , 2007 .

[6]  Anthony Bennett,et al.  Drinking water: Pathogen removal from water – technologies and techniques , 2008 .

[7]  Graham A. Gagnon,et al.  Indirect integrity testing on a pilot-scale UF membrane , 2005 .

[8]  James S. Taylor,et al.  Assessing pathogen removal efficiency of microfiltration by monitoring membrane integrity , 2001 .

[9]  Nandakishore Rajagopalan,et al.  Use of paramagnetic particles in membrane integrity testing , 2008 .

[10]  Sal Giglia,et al.  High sensitivity binary gas integrity test for membrane filters , 2008 .

[11]  J. Duval,et al.  Impact of chemical and structural anisotropy on the electrophoretic mobility of spherical soft multilayer particles: the case of bacteriophage MS2. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[12]  J. Jacangelo,et al.  Advances in the use of low-pressure, hollow fiber membranes for the disinfection of water , 2005 .

[13]  Samer Adham,et al.  Assessing the Reliability of Low Pressure Membrane Systems for Microbial Removal , 1994 .

[14]  Satoshi Takizawa,et al.  Effects of nanoparticles on the ultrafiltration of surface water , 2009 .

[15]  M. R. Templeton,et al.  Particle-Associated Viruses in Water: Impacts on Disinfection Processes , 2008 .

[16]  C. Gantzer,et al.  Development of real-time RT-PCR methods for specific detection of F-specific RNA bacteriophage genogroups: application to urban raw wastewater. , 2006, Journal of virological methods.

[17]  J. Duval,et al.  Efficiency of MS2 phage and Qβ phage removal by membrane filtration in water treatment: Applicability of real-time RT-PCR method , 2009 .

[18]  S. Hassanizadeh,et al.  Removal of Viruses by Soil Passage: Overview of Modeling, Processes, and Parameters , 2000 .

[19]  K. D. Williams,et al.  Autopsy and failure analysis of ultrafiltration membranes from a waste-water treatment system , 2004 .

[20]  S. Panglisch,et al.  Development of a new integrity testing system , 2003 .

[21]  Takanobu Inoue,et al.  Virus removal by ceramic membrane microfiltration with coagulation pretreatment , 2003 .

[22]  C. Lytle,et al.  Minimized virus binding for tests of barrier materials , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[23]  M. Kitis,et al.  Evaluation of biologic and non-biologic methods for assessing virus removal by and integrity of high pressure membrane systems , 2003 .

[24]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Effects of reversible and irreversible membrane fouling on virus removal by a coagulation–microfiltration system , 2008 .

[25]  Peer C. Kamp,et al.  Development of a membrane integrity monitoring strategy for the UF/RO Heemskerk drinking water treatment plant , 2001 .

[26]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Effect of pore structure of membranes and module configuration on virus retention , 1996 .

[27]  Warren T. Johnson,et al.  Automatic monitoring of membrane integrity in microfiltration systems , 1997 .

[28]  R. Trussell,et al.  Rejection of MS‐2 virus by RO membranes , 1998 .

[29]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Irreversible and reversible adhesion between virus particles and hydrolyzing-precipitating aluminium: a function of coagulation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  R. Trussell,et al.  International report: water and wastewater disinfection - trends, issues and practices , 2002 .

[31]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Novel membrane-based sensor for online membrane integrity monitoring , 2008 .

[32]  J. Howell,et al.  Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration , 1995 .

[33]  Anthony Bennett,et al.  Maintaining the integrity of filtration systems , 2005 .

[34]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Application of nanoscale probes for the evaluation of the integrity of ultrafiltration membranes , 2006 .

[35]  Philippe Moulin,et al.  Application of magnetic nanoparticles for UF membrane integrity monitoring at low-pressure operation , 2010 .

[36]  R. Rhodes Trussell,et al.  The Use of Particle Counting in Developing Plant Design Criteria , 1978 .

[37]  C. Gantzer,et al.  Inactivation of Poliovirus 1 and F-Specific RNA Phages and Degradation of Their Genomes by UV Irradiation at 254 Nanometers , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  S. Ohgaki,et al.  Effect of pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes on virus rejection in crossflow conditions , 1994 .

[39]  J. Malina,et al.  Virus rejection by the reverse osmosis-ultrafiltration processes , 1972 .

[40]  P. Trimboli,et al.  Demonstrating the integrity of a large scale microfiltration plant using a Bacillus spore challenge test , 2001 .

[41]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Analysing mass balance of viruses in a coagulation-ceramic microfiltration hybrid system by a combination of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and the plaque forming units (PFU) method. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[42]  W. Hijnen,et al.  Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review. , 2006, Water research.

[43]  M. Otaki,et al.  Virus removal in a membrane separation process , 1998 .

[44]  Jan Hofman,et al.  Fiber failure frequency and causes of hollow fiber integrity loss , 2006 .

[45]  Mehmet Kitis,et al.  Microbial removal and integrity monitoring of ro and NF Membranes , 2003 .

[46]  S. Grant,et al.  Whole Particle Microelectrophoresis for Small Viruses , 1995 .

[47]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Mechanical analysis of hollow fiber membrane integrity in water reuse applications , 2005 .

[48]  J. Lozier,et al.  Monitoring membrane integrity using high sensitivity laser turbidimetry , 2001 .

[49]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Removal of coliphages in secondary effluent by microfiltration-mechanisms of removal and impact of operating parameters. , 2004, Water research.

[50]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Nanoscale probes for the evaluation of the integrity of ultrafiltration membranes , 2006 .

[51]  Nicola Randles,et al.  Large scale operating experience in membrane systems for water and waste water reclamation , 1997 .

[52]  J. Duval,et al.  Aggregation and surface properties of F-specific RNA phages: implication for membrane filtration processes. , 2008, Water research.

[53]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Comparison of removal performance of two surrogates for pathogenic waterborne viruses, bacteriophage Qβ and MS2, in a coagulation–ceramic microfiltration system , 2009 .

[54]  Samer Adham,et al.  Low‐pressure membranes: assessing integrity , 1995 .

[55]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[56]  F. Gaboriaud,et al.  Effects of pH on plaque forming unit counts and aggregation of MS2 bacteriophage , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[57]  J. Laîné,et al.  Mechanism of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and MS2 virus removal by MF and UF , 1995 .

[58]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Effect of membrane pore size, coagulation time, and coagulant dose on virus removal by a coagulation-ceramic microfiltration hybrid system , 2005 .

[59]  D. Bursill,et al.  Drinking water treatment-understanding the processes and meeting the challenges , 2001 .

[60]  Warren T. Johnson,et al.  Predicting log removal performance of membrane systems using in-situ integrity testing , 1998 .

[61]  X. Zheng,et al.  Mechanism investigation of virus removal in a membrane bioreactor , 2006 .

[62]  Kenneth Carlson,et al.  Membrane Integrity Monitoring with Distributed Laser Turbidimetry , 2003 .

[63]  James S. Taylor,et al.  Micro-Organism Rejection by Membrane Systems , 2002 .

[64]  M. Yavuz Corapcioglu,et al.  Delineating the Specific Influence of Virus Isoelectric Point and Size on Virus Adsorption and Transport through Sandy Soils , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[65]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Comparison of behaviors of two surrogates for pathogenic waterborne viruses, bacteriophages Qbeta and MS2, during the aluminum coagulation process. , 2009, Water research.

[66]  B Björlenius,et al.  Removal of viruses, parasitic protozoa and microbial indicators in conventional and membrane processes in a wastewater pilot plant. , 2006, Water research.

[67]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Role of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions for initial enteric virus retention by MF membranes , 2010 .

[68]  K. Farahbakhsh,et al.  Membrane filtration for cold regions – impact of cold water on membrane integrity monitoring tests , 2006 .

[69]  Avner Adin,et al.  Fluorescent dye labeled bacteriophages--a new tracer for the investigation of viral transport in porous media: 1. Introduction and characterization. , 2002, Water research.

[70]  R. Trussell,et al.  Monitoring the integrity of reverse osmosis membranes , 1998 .

[71]  Mark Hernandez,et al.  Fluorescent microspheres as virion surrogates in low-pressure membrane studies , 2009 .

[72]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[73]  Keith E. Carns,et al.  Low‐Pressure Membrane Filtration for Removing Giardia and Microbial Indicators , 1991 .

[74]  S. Oxtoby Experiences in integrity testing ultrafiltration membranes at a large potable water treatment works , 2003 .

[75]  S. Spiegelman,et al.  Comparison of Two Serologically Distinct Ribonucleic Acid Bacteriophages I. Properties of the Viral Particles , 1966, Journal of bacteriology.

[76]  S. Chellam,et al.  Virus removal by iron coagulation-microfiltration. , 2005, Water research.

[77]  Stefan Panglisch,et al.  Monitoring the integrity of capillary membranes by particle counters , 1998 .

[78]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Virus removal in a hybrid coagulation-microfiltration system-Investigating mechanisms of virus removal by a combination of PCR and PFU methods , 2007 .

[79]  T. Urase,et al.  The effect of suction velocity on concentration polarization in microfiltration membranes under turbulent flow conditions , 2000 .

[80]  Y. Sakai,et al.  Adsorption of viruses in water environment onto solid surfaces , 1997 .

[81]  James H. Naismith,et al.  Membrane integrity — direct turbidity measurement of filtrate from MF membrane modules at an operating potable water treatment plant , 2005 .

[82]  J. King,et al.  Pressure denaturation of the bacteriophage P22 coat protein and its entropic stabilization in icosahedral shells. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[83]  S L Ong,et al.  Removal of MS2 bacteriophage using membrane technologies. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[84]  W. Grabow Bacteriophages: Update on application as models for viruses in water , 2004 .

[85]  Benito Jose Marinas,et al.  Improving membrane integrity monitoring indirect methods to reduce plant downtime and increase microbial removal credit , 2002 .

[86]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Removal of viruses by microfiltration membranes at different solution environments , 1999 .

[87]  O. K. Scheible,et al.  Validation of large-scale, monochromatic UV disinfection systems for drinking water using dyed microspheres. , 2008, Water research.

[88]  C. Gerba Applied and theoretical aspects of virus adsorption to surfaces. , 1984, Advances in applied microbiology.

[89]  Integrity testing of microfiltration membranes. , 1984, Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association.

[90]  Z. Do-Quang,et al.  Assessment of a particle counting method for hollow fiber membrane integrity , 1997 .

[91]  Khosrow Farahbakhsh,et al.  Estimating air diffusion contribution to pressure decay during membrane integrity tests , 2004 .

[92]  M. Stenstrom,et al.  Wastewater reclamation at Lake Arrowhead, California: an overview , 1997 .

[93]  W. Johnson,et al.  Issues of operational integrity in membrane drinking water plants , 2003 .