Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces

Evidence from a series of visual-search experiments suggests that detecting an upright face amidst face-like distractors elicits a pattern of reaction times that is consistent with serial search. In four experiments the impact of orientation, number of stimuli in the display, and similarity of stimuli on search rates was examined. All displays were homogeneous. Trials were blocked by distractor type for three experiments. In the first experiment search rates for faces amidst identical faces rotated by 180° were examined. No advantage was evidenced in searching for an upright face. The impact of the quality of the face representation was examined in the second experiment. Search rates are reported for a line-drawn and a digitized image of a face amidst identical faces rotated by 180°. Search was faster for digitized than for line-drawn faces. The findings of the first experiment for orientation were replicated. In the third and fourth experiments the impact of disrupting the facial configuration in distractors was examined and performance was contrasted for blocked and mixed trials, respectively, with the same stimulus set. Reaction times increased with the number of distractors in the display in all but the nonface condition, which produced a shallow slope suggestive of parallel search. Search amidst other distractors appeared to involve the conjoining of a specific set of features with specific spatial relations. The hierarchy of relevant configural dimensions was inconsistent across these two experiments, suggesting that the symmetry, top-down order of features, orientation of the face, and predictability of the distractor type may have an interactive effect on search strategies.

[1]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Functional Organization of Visual Neurones Processing Face Identity , 1986 .

[2]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[3]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[4]  Tim Valentine,et al.  Typicality in categorization, recognition and identification: Evidence from face recognition , 1991 .

[5]  J. C. Meadows The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  I. Rock The perception of disoriented figures. , 1974, Scientific American.

[8]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Are Unilateral Right Posterior Cerebral Lesions Sufficient to Cause Prosopagnosia? Clinical and Radiological Findings in Six Additional Patients , 1986, Cortex.

[9]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  A. Benton,et al.  Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. , 1972, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[13]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cue Saliency in Faces as Assessed by the ‘Photofit’ Technique , 1977, Perception.

[14]  I. Czigler Matching of facial features: Continuous processing, improper filtering, and holistic comparison , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. W. Ellis Normality and pathology in cognitive functions , 1982 .

[16]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  J. Fagan,et al.  Infants' recognition memory for faces. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  E M Critchley,et al.  The human face. , 1985, British medical journal.

[19]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  A. Cowey,et al.  Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  M. Harries,et al.  Visual Processing of Faces in Temporal Cortex: Physiological Evidence for a Modular Organization and Possible Anatomical Correlates , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[23]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Memory for Faces and Schema Theory , 1980 .

[24]  D. Levine,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study , 1967 .

[26]  D. Purcell,et al.  Probing "pop-out": Another look at the face-in-the-crowd effect. , 1989 .

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[28]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[29]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[30]  A. G. Goldstein Learning of inverted and normally oriented faces in children and adults , 1965 .

[31]  R. Desimone Face-Selective Cells in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Benton Facial Recognition 1990 , 1990, Cortex.

[33]  D. Purcell,et al.  The face-detection effect: Configuration enhances detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J. Sergent,et al.  Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  A. Johnston,et al.  Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal , 1992, Perception.

[36]  E. Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. , 1977, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[37]  E. Shuttleworth,et al.  Further observations on the nature of prosopagnosia , 1982, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  S. McKelvie Sex Differences, Lateral Reversal, and Pose as Factors in Recognition Memory for Photographs of Faces , 1987 .

[39]  V. Bruce Searching for Politicians: An Information-Processing Approach to Face Recognition , 1979 .

[40]  H. Hécaen,et al.  Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). , 1962, Archives of neurology.

[41]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[42]  H. Ellis Recognizing faces. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[43]  A. Young,et al.  Childhood prosopagnosia , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[45]  H. Ellis Past and Recent Studies of Prosopagnosia , 1989 .

[46]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces in prosopagnosia , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  N. Haig Exploring Recognition with Interchanged Facial Features , 1986, Perception.

[49]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to Object Constancy: Implications from Neurological Impairments of Object Constancy , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  E. Warrington,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Facial Recognition in Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Lesions , 1967 .

[51]  Memories of mother. , 1988, Scientific American.