Sustainability indicators for clean development mechanism projects in Vietnam

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is one of the flexible instruments of the Kyoto Protocol designed to combat climate change so as to bring advantages to developing countries and developed countries alike. Indeed, CDM projects have a two-fold objective: to offset greenhouse gas emissions and to contribute to sustainable development in the host country. However in many cases, the latter objective appears to be marginalized. This is at least partly due to the difficulties surrounding the definition and the measurement of sustainability, in particular in a developing country context. To assess CDM projects’ contribution to sustainable development in the host country, scholars and practitioners need adapted indicator sets. A set of indicators were developed by way of an iterative Delphi approach amongst selected Vietnamese experts. The Delphi approach allowed a systematic collection of the experts’ judgements on the sustainability indicators through a set of sequentially applied questionnaires, interspersed with feedback from earlier responses. This exercise resulted in the selection of a set of 36 indicators, which emphasise economic efficiency, public health and pollution issues. The exercise yielded a locally supported and context-specific set of sustainability indicators that will allow Vietnamese decision-makers to enhance the sustainability of the approved CDM projects. In the future this set should be continually improved through real-life application and further participation from local stakeholders. This study is a first step in a long-term process towards developing an adapted toolkit for sustainability assessment of CDM projects in Vietnam.

[1]  Alan Brent,et al.  CDM Projects under the Kyoto Protocol: A Methodology for Sustainability Assessment – Experiences from South Africa and Uruguay , 2007 .

[2]  M. Jung Host Country Attractiveness for CDM Non-Sink Projects , 2005 .

[3]  Karen Holm Olsen,et al.  Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: A new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the project design documents submitted for validation , 2008 .

[4]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[5]  Pham Hoang Hai,et al.  Health and environmental sustainability indicators in Quang Tri Province, Vietnam , 2009 .

[6]  Graham Miller,et al.  The development of indicators for sustainable tourism: results of a Delphi survey of tourism researchers , 2001 .

[7]  Patrick Nussbaumer,et al.  On the contribution of labelled Certified Emission Reductions to sustainable development: A multi-criteria evaluation of CDM projects , 2009 .

[8]  Christopher Sutter,et al.  Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects , 2007 .

[9]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts , 2007, Expert Systems with Applications.

[10]  Pham Hoang Hai,et al.  Indicators for Sustainable Development in the Quang Tri Province, Vietnam , 2009 .

[11]  Maria Gjølberg,et al.  Measuring the immeasurable?: Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries , 2009 .

[12]  Kenji Yamaji,et al.  Important roles of Fischer–Tropsch synfuels in the global energy future , 2008 .

[13]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A time scale-oriented approach for building medical expert systems , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  S. Bell,et al.  Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? , 1999 .

[15]  R. Cassen Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .