Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations

Animations of molecular structure and dynamics are often used to help students understand the abstract ideas of chemistry. This qualitative study investigated how the features of two different styles of molecular-level animation affected students’ explanations of how sodium chloride dissolves in water. In small group sessions 18 college-level general chemistry students dissolved table salt in water, after which they individually viewed two animations of salt dissolution. Before and after viewing each animation the participants provided pictorial, written, and oral explanations of the process at the macroscopic and molecular levels. The students then discussed the animations as a group. An analysis of the data showed that students incorporated some of the microscopic structural and functional features from the animations into their explanations. However, oral explanations revealed that in many cases, participants who drew or wrote correct explanations did not comprehend their meanings. Students’ drawings may have reflected only what they had seen, rather than a cohesive understanding. Students’ explanations given after viewing the animations improved, but some prior misconceptions were retained and in some cases, new misconceptions appeared. Students reported that they found the animations useful in learning; however, they sometimes missed essential features when they watched the animation alone.

[1]  R. Mayer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .

[2]  Lih-Juan ChanLin.  Attributes of Animation for Learning Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[3]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .

[4]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .

[5]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry , 1993 .

[6]  Thomas J. Greenbowe,et al.  Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction , 1998 .

[7]  G. Bodner.  Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[8]  C. Terlouw,et al.  Multiple representations in web-based learning of chemistry concepts , 2003 .

[9]  Hennie Kramers-Pals,et al.  The Use of Animations in Chemical Education , 2003 .

[10]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[11]  D. Ardaç,et al.  Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .

[12]  Miles Pickering.  Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving , 1990 .

[13]  Susan C. Nurrenbern,et al.  Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. , 1987 .

[14]  Barbara A. Sawrey.  Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited , 1990 .

[15]  Jeffrey R. Appling,et al.  Instructional Technology and Molecular Visualization , 2004 .

[16]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students' Conceptions: Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt , 2001 .

[17]  Theodore L. Brown.  Chemistry: The Central Science , 1981 .

[18]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Using a Computer Animation To Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding of a Can-Crushing Demonstration. , 2000 .

[19]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Dictionary of qualitative inquiry , 2001 .

[20]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Chemistry: Molecules, Matter, and Change , 1997 .

[21]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells , 1997 .

[22]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[24]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[27]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[28]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[29]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Students' Misconceptions in Electrochemistry Regarding Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Salt Bridge , 1997 .

[30]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[31]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .