Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Mayer,et al. How Seductive Details Do Their Damage: A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 1998 .
[2] Lih-Juan ChanLin. Attributes of Animation for Learning Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .
[3] Xiufeng Liu,et al. Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .
[4] Yehudit Judy Dori,et al. High-School Chemistry Students' Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment , 1999 .
[5] Mary B. Nakhleh,et al. Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry , 1993 .
[6] Thomas J. Greenbowe,et al. Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction , 1998 .
[7] G. Bodner. Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .
[8] C. Terlouw,et al. Multiple representations in web-based learning of chemistry concepts , 2003 .
[9] Hennie Kramers-Pals,et al. The Use of Animations in Chemical Education , 2003 .
[10] M. Crotty. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .
[11] D. Ardaç,et al. Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .
[12] Miles Pickering. Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving , 1990 .
[13] Susan C. Nurrenbern,et al. Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. , 1987 .
[14] Barbara A. Sawrey. Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited , 1990 .
[15] Jeffrey R. Appling,et al. Instructional Technology and Molecular Visualization , 2004 .
[16] Jazlin Ebenezer,et al. A Hypermedia Environment to Explore and Negotiate Students' Conceptions: Animation of the Solution Process of Table Salt , 2001 .
[17] Theodore L. Brown. Chemistry: The Central Science , 1981 .
[18] Michael J. Sanger,et al. Using a Computer Animation To Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding of a Can-Crushing Demonstration. , 2000 .
[19] Thomas A. Schwandt. Dictionary of qualitative inquiry , 2001 .
[20] Loretta L. Jones,et al. Chemistry: Molecules, Matter, and Change , 1997 .
[21] Michael J. Sanger,et al. Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells , 1997 .
[22] Steven B. Most,et al. What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.
[23] Sharan B. Merriam,et al. Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .
[24] S. Yantis,et al. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] Barbara Tversky,et al. Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[26] A. H. Johnstone,et al. The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .
[27] Michael R. Abraham,et al. The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .
[28] S. Yantis. Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .
[29] Michael J. Sanger,et al. Students' Misconceptions in Electrochemistry Regarding Current Flow in Electrolyte Solutions and the Salt Bridge , 1997 .
[30] A. Paivio. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .
[31] Yehudit Judy Dori,et al. Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[32] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .