Factors affecting the selection of search tactics: Tasks, knowledge, process, and systems

This study investigated whether and how different factors in relation to task, user-perceived knowledge, search process, and system affect users' search tactic selection. Thirty-one participants, representing the general public with their own tasks, were recruited for this study. Multiple methods were employed to collect data, including pre-questionnaire, verbal protocols, log analysis, diaries, and post-questionnaires. Statistical analysis revealed that seven factors were significantly associated with tactic selection. These factors consist of work task types, search task types, familiarity with topic, search skills, search session length, search phases, and system types. Moreover, the study also discovered, qualitatively, in what ways these factors influence the selection of search tactics. Based on the findings, the authors discuss practical implications for system design to support users' application of multiple search tactics for each factor.

[1]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in Search Tactics and Relevance Judgements when Preparing a Research Proposal A Summary of the Findings of a Longitudinal Study , 2001, Information Retrieval.

[3]  Suresh K. Bhavnani,et al.  Important Cognitive Components of Domain-Specific Search Knowledge , 2001, TREC.

[4]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Ellen M. Voorhees,et al.  The Tenth Text REtrieval Conference, TREC 2001 | NIST , 2002 .

[6]  Mika Käki,et al.  Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users , 2005, WWW '05.

[7]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of query reformulations in different task types , 2010, ASIST.

[9]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Analysis of a very large web search engine query log , 1999, SIGF.

[10]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. , 1993 .

[11]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[12]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  David Robins,et al.  Shifts of focus on various aspects of user information problems during interactive information retrieval , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Kazuhisa Miwa,et al.  A cognitive study of information seeking processes in the WWW: the effects of searcher's knowledge and experience , 2001, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering.

[15]  Helen Howard,et al.  Measures that discriminate among online searchers with different training and experience , 1982 .

[16]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  Information Retrieval: Searching in the 21st Century; Human Information Retrieval , 2010 .

[17]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .

[18]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide web , 1997 .

[19]  Ali Shiri,et al.  The effects of topic complexity and familiarity on cognitive and physical moves in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Anne Aula,et al.  Query Formulation in Web Information Search , 2003, ICWI.

[21]  Yuelin Li.  An exploration of the relationships between work tasks and users' interaction performance , 2010, ASIST.

[22]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  Tales from the Field: Search Strategies Applied in Web Searching , 2010, Future Internet.

[23]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Moves in online searching , 1985 .

[24]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Users can change their web search tactics: Design guidelines for categorized overviews , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Hong Xie.  Online IR system evaluation: online databases versus Web search engines , 2004, Online Inf. Rev..

[26]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  Transitions in search tactics during the Web-based search process , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  VakkariPertti,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal A longitudinal case study , 2003 .

[28]  Yuelin Li,et al.  Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Iwan G. J. H. Wopereis,et al.  Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Personalizing information retrieval for multi-session tasks: the roles of task stage and task type , 2010, SIGIR '10.

[31]  James E. Pitkow,et al.  Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web , 1995, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[32]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Iris Xie,et al.  Dimensions of tasks: influences on information-seeking and retrieving process , 2009, J. Documentation.

[34]  Karl Gyllstrom,et al.  A comparison of query and term suggestion features for interactive searching , 2009, SIGIR.

[35]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Search Tactics of Web Users in Searching for Texts, Graphics, Known Items and Subjects , 1998 .

[36]  Tsai-Youn Hung,et al.  Search Moves and Tactics for Image Retrieval in the Field of Journalism: A Pilot Study , 2005 .

[37]  Hong Xie,et al.  Traditional IR for web users: a context for general audience digital libraries , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  S. Parker.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1970 .

[39]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[40]  Harm J. A. Biemans,et al.  Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[41]  Kun Lu,et al.  Supporting effective health and biomedical information retrieval and navigation: A novel facet view interface evaluation , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[42]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The interactive information retrieval context , 2006, Information Processing & Management.

[43]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[44]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau.  Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[45]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Information-seeking behaviours and cognitive search strategies in different search tasks on the WWW , 2006 .

[46]  Katriina Byström,et al.  Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Judit Olah,et al.  Shifts between search stages during task-performance in mediated information seeking interaction , 2006, ASIST.

[48]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Knowledge-Based Search Tactics , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[49]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[50]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Information search tactics , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[51]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[52]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..