Design optimization of a total knee replacement for improved constraint and flexion kinematics.

Total knee replacement (TKR) constraint and flexion range of motion can be limiting factors in terms of kinematics performance and cause for revision. These characteristics are closely related to the shape of the implant components. No previous studies have used a rigorous and systematic design optimization method to determine the optimal shape of TKR components. Previous studies have failed to define a quantifiable objective function for optimization, have not used any optimization algorithms, and have only considered a limited design space (4 or less design variables). This study addresses these limitations and determines the optimum shape of the femoral component and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) insert in terms of kinematics. The constraint characteristics with respect to those of the natural knee, the importance of the posterior cruciate ligament, and the flexion range of motion were all considered. The kinematics optimized design featured small femoral radii of curvature in the frontal and sagittal planes, but asymmetric with slightly larger radii of curvature for the lateral condyle. This condyle was also less conforming than the medial side. Compared to a commercially available TKR design, the kinematics performance (based on constraint and flexion range of motion) was improved by 81%, with constraint characteristics generally closer to those of the natural knee and a 12.6% increase in the flexion range of motion (up to 143°). The results yielded a new TKR design while demonstrating the feasibility of design optimization in TKR design.

[1]  In Gwun Jang,et al.  Computational study of Wolff's law with trabecular architecture in the human proximal femur using topology optimization. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  P S Walker,et al.  Optimization of the bearing surface geometry of total knees. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  P. Walker,et al.  Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  S L Woo,et al.  A validated three-dimensional computational model of a human knee joint. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Ryan Willing,et al.  Three dimensional shape optimization of total knee replacements for reduced wear , 2009 .

[6]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[7]  I. Y. Kim,et al.  Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation , 2005 .

[8]  D. Shakespeare,et al.  Flexion after total knee replacement. A comparison between the Medial Pivot knee and a posterior stabilised implant. , 2006, The Knee.

[9]  D. Davy,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M Beaugonin,et al.  Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Ming-Shium Hsieh,et al.  Primitive results after medial-pivot knee arthroplasties: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Ryan Willing,et al.  The development, calibration and validation of a numerical total knee replacement kinematics simulator considering laxity and unconstrained flexion motions , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[13]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements , 1997 .

[14]  P S Walker,et al.  Effects of total knee replacement design on femoral-tibial contact conditions. , 1986, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Martin Browne,et al.  Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[18]  T. Gruen,et al.  Midterm results with the PFC Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  In Gwun Jang,et al.  Computational simulation of simultaneous cortical and trabecular bone change in human proximal femur during bone remodeling. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Javad Dargahi,et al.  Optimization of the geometry of total knee implant in the sagittal plane using FEA. , 2003, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[21]  Roberto Rossi,et al.  Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  J B Stiehl,et al.  Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  P S Walker,et al.  Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  P S Walker,et al.  Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  A. Amin,et al.  Five-year results of the Sigma total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Knee.

[26]  In Gwun Jang,et al.  Application of design space optimization to bone remodeling simulation of trabecular architecture in human proximal femur for higher computational efficiency , 2010 .

[27]  I. Kim,et al.  Design optimization of a total hip prosthesis for wear reduction. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  P S Walker,et al.  Design forms of total knee replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[29]  E. Abdel-Rahman,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic behaviour of the human knee joint under impact loading. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[30]  Stephen J Piazza,et al.  Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  P. Walker,et al.  The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  P R Fernandes,et al.  A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  L. Blankevoort,et al.  Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Saikat Pal,et al.  Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  S Amiri,et al.  Mechanics of the passive knee joint. Part 1: The role of the tibial articular surfaces in guiding the passive motion , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  W J Maloney,et al.  The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  Ryan Willing,et al.  A holistic numerical model to predict strain hardening and damage of UHMWPE under multiple total knee replacement kinematics and experimental validation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.