Ligand Clouds around Protein Clouds: A Scenario of Ligand Binding with Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) were found to be widely associated with human diseases and may serve as potential drug design targets. However, drug design targeting IDPs is still in the very early stages. Progress in drug design is usually achieved using experimental screening; however, the structural disorder of IDPs makes it difficult to characterize their interaction with ligands using experiments alone. To better understand the structure of IDPs and their interactions with small molecule ligands, we performed extensive simulations on the c-Myc370–409 peptide and its binding to a reported small molecule inhibitor, ligand 10074-A4. We found that the conformational space of the apo c-Myc370–409 peptide was rather dispersed and that the conformations of the peptide were stabilized mainly by charge interactions and hydrogen bonds. Under the binding of the ligand, c-Myc370–409 remained disordered. The ligand was found to bind to c-Myc370–409 at different sites along the chain and behaved like a ‘ligand cloud’. In contrast to ligand binding to more rigid target proteins that usually results in a dominant bound structure, ligand binding to IDPs may better be described as ligand clouds around protein clouds. Nevertheless, the binding of the ligand and a non-ligand to the c-Myc370–409 target could be clearly distinguished. The present study provides insights that will help improve rational drug design that targets IDPs.

[1]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[2]  Jory Z. Ruscio,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the Abeta(21-30) peptide from the interplay of NMR experiments and molecular simulations. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Drugs for 'protein clouds': targeting intrinsically disordered transcription factors. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[4]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  P. Tompa,et al.  Malleable machines take shape in eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[6]  John S Lazo,et al.  Low molecular weight inhibitors of Myc–Max interaction and function , 2003, Oncogene.

[7]  A. Üren,et al.  A small molecule blocking oncogenic protein EWS-FLI1 interaction with RNA helicase A inhibits growth of Ewing’s sarcoma , 2009 .

[8]  Robert B. Best,et al.  A Preformed Binding Interface in the Unbound Ensemble of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein: Evidence from Molecular Simulations , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Inhibitor discovery targeting the intermediate structure of beta-amyloid peptide on the conformational transition pathway: implications in the aggregation mechanism of beta-amyloid peptide. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[10]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Davit A Potoyan,et al.  Energy landscape analyses of disordered histone tails reveal special organization of their conformational dynamics. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[13]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[14]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[15]  Vladimir N Uversky,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins may escape unwanted interactions via functional misfolding. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[16]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Wishart,et al.  Rapid and accurate calculation of protein 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shifts , 2003, Journal of Biomolecular NMR.

[18]  A. Dunker,et al.  Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: an overview , 2009, Cell Research.

[19]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Exploring the binding diversity of intrinsically disordered proteins involved in one‐to‐many binding , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: a critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Do intrinsically disordered proteins possess high specificity in protein-protein interactions? , 2013, Chemistry.

[22]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Rational drug design via intrinsically disordered protein. , 2006, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A physical basis for protein secondary structure. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Intrinsic disorder and protein function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[25]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in human diseases: introducing the D2 concept. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[26]  Zhirong Liu,et al.  Inherent relationships among different biophysical prediction methods for intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[27]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  Joseph A Marsh,et al.  Ensemble modeling of protein disordered states: Experimental restraint contributions and validation , 2011, Proteins.

[29]  D. Case,et al.  Automated prediction of 15N, 13Cα, 13Cβ and 13C′ chemical shifts in proteins using a density functional database , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[30]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[31]  L. Lai,et al.  Dynamic modeling of human 5-lipoxygenase-inhibitor interactions helps to discover novel inhibitors. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[32]  Liling Zhao,et al.  Novel Strategies for Drug Discovery Based on Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (IDPs) , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[33]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  Homogeneous and heterogeneous tertiary structure ensembles of amyloid-β peptides. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[34]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declara... , 2008 .

[35]  Christos Boutsidis,et al.  Atomic-level characterization of the ensemble of the Aβ(1-42) monomer in water using unbiased molecular dynamics simulations and spectral algorithms. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Smoothing molecular interactions: The “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins , 2010, Proteins.

[37]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 3. Ligands, post-translational modifications, and diseases associated with intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[38]  S. Metallo,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins are potential drug targets. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[39]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  A free-energy landscape for coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein in explicit solvent from detailed all-atom computations. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Discovery of multitarget inhibitors by combining molecular docking with common pharmacophore matching. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Ariele Viacava Follis,et al.  Multiple independent binding sites for small-molecule inhibitors on the oncoprotein c-Myc. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Binding Energy Landscape Analysis Helps to Discriminate True Hits from High-Scoring Decoys in Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[43]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  Residual Structures, Conformational Fluctuations, and Electrostatic Interactions in the Synergistic Folding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Hao Chen,et al.  Virtual Screening of Novel Noncovalent Inhibitors for SARS-CoV 3C-like Proteinase , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[45]  Ariele Viacava Follis,et al.  Structural rationale for the coupled binding and unfolding of the c-Myc oncoprotein by small molecules. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[46]  P. Chène,et al.  Inhibition of the p53-MDM2 interaction: targeting a protein-protein interface. , 2004, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[47]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[48]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  X-Ray Structures of Myc-Max and Mad-Max Recognizing DNA Molecular Bases of Regulation by Proto-Oncogenic Transcription Factors , 2003, Cell.

[49]  J. Michel,et al.  The Impact of Small Molecule Binding on the Energy Landscape of the Intrinsically Disordered Protein C-Myc , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  T. Head-Gordon,et al.  Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[51]  A. Bax,et al.  SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network , 2010, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[52]  Collin M. Stultz,et al.  Constructing ensembles for intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[53]  Kai J. Kohlhoff,et al.  Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[54]  Yongqi Huang,et al.  Anchoring Intrinsically Disordered Proteins to Multiple Targets: Lessons from N-Terminus of the p53 Protein , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[55]  John S Lazo,et al.  Improved low molecular weight Myc-Max inhibitors , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[56]  V. Uversky Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[57]  T. Shinohara,et al.  [In-vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2]. , 2007, Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.

[58]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  MMPBSA.py: An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[59]  Wim F Vranken,et al.  ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[60]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  Determination of secondary structure populations in disordered states of proteins using nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[61]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[62]  H. Chan,et al.  Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  P. Tompa Intrinsically unstructured proteins. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[64]  Giovanna Zinzalla,et al.  Small-molecule inhibition of c-MYC:MAX leucine zipper formation is revealed by ion mobility mass spectrometry. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Electrostatically accelerated coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.