Using the Glasgow Benefit Plot as a Prognostic Instrument and for Preoperative Counseling in Patients With Otosclerosis

The Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP) is a graph showing the pure-tone thresholds preoperatively and postoperatively, and is meant to visualize the possible outcome of binaural hearing for individual patients. We used our database comprising a large number of patient data to test the usefulness of the GBP. Study Design: Evaluation based on retrospective clinical data. Setting: Tertiary referral center, University clinic. Main Outcome Measures: Audiometric assessment included bilateral preoperative and postoperative evaluation using conventional audiometry. Three preoperative groups (unilateral, asymmetric, and symmetric hearing impairment) were split into 6 postoperative categories in the GBP diagram. Results: Considering the 509 operations, including 34 bilateral operations, the total outcome was distributed as follows: 34% resulted in bilateral normal hearing, 24% unilateral normal hearing (in operated ear), 14% still unilateral hearing impairment (in operated ear), 13% symmetric hearing impairment, 10% asymmetric hearing impairment (operated ear best), 5% still asymmetric hearing impairment (nonoperated ear best). The distribution of outcomes depended in part on the bone conduction level in the operated ear and in part on the hearing status in the contralateral ear. Conclusion: The GBP is a useful instrument that provides a means for judging the binaural hearing status. However, the outcome of stapes surgery for individual persons and for a group depends critically on the preoperative audiometric criteria for patients who are chosen for surgery. In cases of depressed bone conductions, the method does not indicate the upper limit for possible hearing improvement. A number of patients with combined hearing impairments were included in the present study population. In preoperative counseling, the GBP must be complemented with information with regard to the limitation of possible hearing improvement owing to the individual bone conduction level.

[1]  D. Welch,et al.  How we do it: Tympanoplasty: are different three‐ and four‐frequency averages comparable? , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[2]  W. Dreschler,et al.  Efficacy of Evaluation of Audiometric Results After Stapes Surgery in Otosclerosis. I. The Effects of Using Different Audiologic Parameters and Criteria on Success Rates , 2001, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  G. Browning Do patients and surgeons agree?: the Gordon Smyth Memorial Lecture. , 1997, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[4]  B. Magnuson,et al.  Hearing results in otosclerosis surgery after partial stapedectomy, total stapedectomy and stapedotomy. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy , 1996, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[6]  K. Doyle,et al.  Reporting operative hearing results in stapes surgery: does choice of outcome measure make a difference? , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[7]  J. W. House,et al.  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation of Results of Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss ∗ , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[8]  K. Berliner,et al.  Reporting operative hearing results: does choice of outcome measure make a difference? , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[9]  G. Brookes,et al.  The Glasgow benefit plot used to assess the effect of bilateral stapedectomy. , 1995, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[10]  H. L. Tay,et al.  The assessment of hearing results following surgery for otitis media with effusion using the Glasgow Benefit Plot , 1994, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[11]  G. Browning Reporting the benefits from middle ear surgery using the Glasgow Benefit Plot. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[12]  J. Toner,et al.  Comparison of methods of evaluating hearing benefit of middle ear surgery , 1993, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[13]  S. Gatehouse,et al.  The glasgow benefit plot: A new method for reporting benefits from middle ear surgery , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  C. C. Patterson,et al.  Results of middle ear reconstruction: do patients and surgeons agree? , 1985, The American journal of otology.

[15]  Austin Df Reporting results in tympanoplasty. , 1985 .

[16]  D. Austin Reporting results in tympanoplasty. , 1985, The American journal of otology.