Multimedia learning in social sciences: limitations of external graphical representations

In a series of six experimental studies, each consisting of three sub-studies, the central question was researched whether adding external graphical representations to printed or electronic learning materials improves retention and transfer scores. These studies research the degree of generalizability of Mayer's cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) to the knowledge domain of the social sciences. The research hypotheses build on the assumption that this knowledge domain differs in the way instructional designers are able to develop adequate depictive external graphical representations. Earlier CTML-research was mostly carried out in the field of the natural sciences, where graphical representations are depictive in nature and/or where representations can be developed from existing or acquired iconic sign systems. The results indicate that alternative guidelines might need to be considered when learners study learning materials with external graphical representations that reflect low levels of repleteness and do not build on an iconic sign system previously mastered or acquired by the learners. The research results reveal that studying this type of representation does not result in higher test performance and does not result in lower levels of mental load.

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. , 1996 .

[2]  Hope J. Hartman.  Metacognition in Learning and Instruction , 2001 .

[3]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[4]  J. Sweller.  COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[5]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[6]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Learning in complex domains: When and why do multiple representations help? , 2003 .

[7]  F. Paas,et al.  Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.

[8]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[9]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[10]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[12]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Multimedia learning: beyond modality , 2003 .

[13]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[14]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Jelke van der Pal,et al.  Balancing situativity and formality: the importance of relating a formal language to interactive graphics in logic instruction , 1999 .

[16]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[17]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. , 1989 .

[19]  R. Cox.  Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences , 1999 .

[20]  R. Kozma.  The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[21]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of art : an approach to a theory of symbols , 1979 .

[22]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[23]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Complexities of graphical representations during ecology lectures: an analysis rooted in semiotics and hermeneutic phenomenology , 1999 .

[24]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[25]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[26]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[27]  Mike Dobson,et al.  Information enforcement and learning with interactive graphical systems , 1999 .

[28]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Successive Responses to Simultaneous Stimuli , 1956 .

[29]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[30]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[31]  R. Mayer.  Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving , 1998 .

[32]  Tina Seufert.  Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[33]  F. Paas.  Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[34]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[35]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[36]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[37]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[38]  Hermann G. Ebner,et al.  Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation , 2003 .

[39]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[40]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The modality effect in multimedia instructions , 2001 .

[41]  W. Thalheimer,et al.  How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology , 2002 .

[42]  Keith Stenning.  The cognitive consequences of modality assignment for educational communication: the picture in logic teaching , 1999 .

[43]  D. Lewalter.  Cognitive Strategies for Learning from Static and Dynamic Visuals , 2003 .

[44]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[45]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols , 1971 .