Performance of advanced telecommand frame synchronizer under pulsed jamming conditions

This paper studies frame synchronization for use with the advanced communication link transmission unit format that was recently proposed for updating the telecommand synchronization and channel coding standard for space applications. With a view to improving the robustness against jamming, future satellite telecommand systems are planning to adopt direct-sequence spread spectrum modulation and advanced channel coding. Compared to the frame synchronization algorithm specified in the current Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) recommendation, we consider a longer start sequence and relax the condition for declaring synchronization. We investigate the performance of this algorithm in the presence of jamming, and show that the frame synchronizer can be designed such that the overall system's robustness against pulsed jamming is limited by the robustness of the code rather than the synchronizer.

[1]  Marco Chiani,et al.  On sequential frame synchronization in AWGN channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  C. Gebotys,et al.  On the specification of symmetric key management parameters for secure space missions , 2012, 2012 IEEE First AESS European Conference on Satellite Telecommunications (ESTEL).

[3]  Michel Barbeau WiMax/802.16 threat analysis , 2005, Q2SWinet '05.

[4]  Francesco Vatalaro,et al.  Performance evaluation of GSM robustness against smart jamming attacks , 2012, 2012 5th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing.

[5]  Oren Eliezer,et al.  Sequential Frame Synchronization Based on Hypothesis Testing With Unknown Channel State Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Peter F. Driessen Performance of frame synchronization in packet transmission using bit erasure information , 1991, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Craig K. Rushforth,et al.  Frame Synchronization in the Presence of Burst Jamming , 1985, MILCOM 1985 - IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[8]  Lorenzo Simone,et al.  Comparison of channel codes in presence of pulsed jammers in TT&C links , 2014, 2014 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC).

[9]  Stefano Cioni,et al.  Analysis and performance evaluation of new coding options for space telecommand links - Part I: AWGN channels , 2015, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[10]  Jeffrey H. Reed,et al.  Vulnerability of LTE to hostile interference , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[11]  L. Simone,et al.  Fast acquisition techniques for very long PN codes for On-Board Secure TTC transponders , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[12]  J. Massey,et al.  Optimum Frame Synchronization , 1972, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  C.K. Rushforth,et al.  Frame Synchronization in the Presence of Errors and Erasures , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Stefano Cioni,et al.  Analysis and performance evaluation of new coding options for space telecommand links - part II: jamming channels , 2015, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[15]  Stephan Pfletschinger,et al.  Frame Synchronization for Next Generation Uplink Coding in Deep Space Communications , 2014, GLOBECOM 2014.