An iterative technique for the detection of land-cover transitions in multitemporal remote-sensing images

The authors propose a supervised nonparametric technique based on the "compound classification rule" for minimum error, to detect land-cover transitions between two remote-sensing images acquired at different times. Thanks to a simplifying hypothesis, the compound classification rule is transformed into a form easier to compute. In the obtained rule, an important role is played by the probabilities of transitions, which take into account the temporal dependence between two images. In order to avoid requiring that training sets be representative of all possible types of transitions, the authors propose an iterative algorithm which allows the probabilities of transitions to be estimated directly from the images under investigation. Experimental results on two Thematic Mapper images confirm that the proposed algorithm may provide remarkably better detection accuracy than the "Post Classification Comparison" algorithm, which is based on the separate classifications of the two images.

[1]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[2]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[3]  P. H. Swain,et al.  Bayesian classification in a time-varying environment , 1978 .

[4]  H. Gish,et al.  A probabilistic approach to the understanding and training of neural network classifiers , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. , 1983 .

[6]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[8]  P. S. Chavez,et al.  Automatic detection of vegetation changes in the southwestern United States using remotely sensed images , 1994 .

[9]  K. Green,et al.  Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change , 1994 .

[10]  Carl W. Ramm,et al.  Correct Formation of the Kappa Coefficient of Agreement , 1987 .

[11]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Processing of multitemporal Landsat TM imagery to optimize extraction of forest cover change features , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[13]  E. LeDrew,et al.  Application of principal components analysis to change detection , 1987 .

[14]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[15]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities , 1991, Neural Computation.

[16]  D. Muchoney,et al.  Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation , 1994 .

[17]  King-Sun Fu,et al.  Statistical pattern classification using contextual information , 1980 .

[18]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  Spatial variability of images and the monitoring of changes in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index , 1995 .

[19]  T. Fung An Assessment Of Tm Imagery For Land Cover Change Detection , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.