Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews

Team coordination during a simulated clean approach performed by 42 civil aviation cockpit crews was analysed. Several hypotheses regarding the adaptive use of implicit and explicit coordination, leadership and heedful interrelating were tested. The results indicate the adaptiveness of coordination to different levels of standardisation and task load and the general importance of explicit coordination for good performance. Leadership seems to be required mainly for work phases with little standardisation. In exploratory lag sequential analyses, heedful behaviour in the seven best and six worst performing crews was examined. The coordination sequences in high performance crews were found to be more succinct and well balanced, indicating that a shared sense of heedfulness is crucial for effectiveness. Theoretical implications for the conceptualisation of adaptive coordination and heedfulness and practical implications for improving crew training are discussed. Statement of Relevance: Analyses of team coordination during a simulated clean approach performed by civil aviation cockpit crews demonstrated the occurrence and effectiveness of adaptive coordination in response to different levels of task load and standardisation. Results also indicated the importance of heedful interrelating, both as a form of coordination and as a way of regulating the adaptiveness of coordination efforts. These findings have important implications for improving crew training, leadership practices and possibly also standard operating procedures.

[1]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  Implicit coordination in firefighting practice: design implications for teaching fire emergency responders , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership , 1990 .

[5]  Charles H Morris,et al.  Pilot mental workload: how well do pilots really perform? , 2006, Ergonomics.

[6]  A. Edmondson Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[7]  David M. Gaba,et al.  Cognitive Aids in a Simulated Anesthetic Crisis , 2007 .

[8]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Dynamic Delegation: Shared, Hierarchical, and Deindividualized Leadership in Extreme Action Teams , 2006 .

[9]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Gudela Grote,et al.  RULES MANAGEMENT AS SOURCE FOR LOOSE COUPLING IN HIGH-RISK SYSTEMS , 2016 .

[11]  David M Gaba,et al.  Adaptive coordination in cardiac anaesthesia: a study of situational changes in coordination patterns using a new observation system , 2008, Ergonomics.

[12]  Robert C. Ginnett,et al.  CREWS AS GROUPS: THEIR FORMATION AND THEIR LEADERSHIP. , 1993 .

[13]  G Grote,et al.  The influence of standardisation and task load on team coordination patterns during anaesthesia inductions , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[14]  Candace Ferrell,et al.  Tacit Coordination in Anticipation of Small Group Task Completion , 1996 .

[15]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[16]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[17]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Coordination in Task-Performing Groups , 2002 .

[18]  T. K. Harrison,et al.  Use of Cognitive Aids in a Simulated Anesthetic Crisis , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Analyzing Communication Sequences for Team Training Needs Assessment , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Review of James G. March, Martin Schulz, and Xueguang Zhou, The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes , 2000 .

[21]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[22]  R L Helmreich,et al.  The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. , 1999, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[23]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does CRM Training Improve Teamwork Skills in the Cockpit?: Two Evaluation Studies , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[24]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[25]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[26]  E Salas,et al.  Status and cockpit dynamics: a review and empirical study. , 1998, Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association.

[27]  Norbert K. Semmer,et al.  Leading to Recovery: Group Performance and Coordinative Activities in Medical Emergency Driven Groups , 2006 .

[28]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Testing Three Team Training Strategies in Intact Teams , 2007 .

[29]  R. Meyers,et al.  Complaint and solution-oriented circles: Interaction patterns in work group discussions , 2009 .

[30]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[31]  B. B. Morgan,et al.  Team Workload: Its Meaning and Measurement , 1997 .

[32]  V. Druskat,et al.  The Content of Effective Teamwork Mental Models in Self-Managing Teams: Ownership, Learning and Heedful Interrelating , 2002 .

[33]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Contingent leadership and effectiveness of trauma resuscitation teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[36]  G. Grote,et al.  Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness , 2010 .

[37]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1991 .

[38]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[39]  M. Kolbe,et al.  Koordination von Entscheidungsprozessen in Gruppen , 2007 .

[40]  H. Artman,et al.  Team situation assessment and information distribution , 2000, Ergonomics.

[41]  G. Yukl,et al.  An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership , 1999 .

[42]  M. Waller The Timing of Adaptive Group Responses to Nonroutine Events , 1999 .

[43]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[44]  B. Kanki,et al.  Communication indices of crew coordination. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[45]  Captain H. C. Alger Cockpit resource management. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[46]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[47]  Katherine A. Wilson,et al.  Crew Resource Management Training Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis and Some Critical Needs , 2008 .

[48]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Crew Resource Management Training Work? An Update, an Extension, and Some Critical Needs , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[49]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[50]  Judith Orasanu,et al.  DECISION-MAKING IN THE COCKPIT. , 1993 .

[51]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Developing a Method for Evaluating Crew Resource Management Skills: A European Perspective , 2002 .

[52]  M. Merry Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership , 2004 .

[53]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness , 1976 .

[54]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  The teleo-affective limits of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[55]  Heather A. Priest,et al.  Errors in the Heat of Battle: Taking a Closer Look at Shared Cognition Breakdowns Through Teamwork , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[56]  Gerhard G. van de Bunt,et al.  Heed, a missing link between trust, monitoring and performance in knowledge intensive teams , 2008 .

[57]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Cognition in organizations. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  Philip Smith Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  Anna Borg,et al.  Principles of Regulating Interaction in Teams Practicing Face-To-Face Communication Versus Teams Practicing Computer-Mediated Communication , 2005 .

[60]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. , 1997 .