The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English

We investigated the influence of English proficiency on ERPs elicited by lexical semantic violations in English sentences, in both native English speakers and native Spanish speakers who learned English in adulthood. All participants were administered a standardized test of English proficiency, and data were analyzed using linear mixed effects (LME) modeling. Relative to native learners, late learners showed reduced amplitude and delayed onset of the N400 component associated with reading semantic violations. As well, after the N400 late learners showed reduced anterior negative scalp potentials and increased posterior potentials. In both native and late learners, N400 amplitudes to semantically appropriate words were larger for people with lower English proficiency. N400 amplitudes to semantic violations, however, were not influenced by proficiency. Although both N400 onset latency and the late ERP effects differed between L1 and L2 learners, neither correlated with proficiency. Different approaches to dealing with the high degree of correlation between proficiency and native/late learner group status are discussed in the context of LME modeling. The results thus indicate that proficiency can modulate ERP effects in both L1 and L2 learners, and for some measures (in this case, N400 amplitude), L1–L2 differences may be entirely accounted for by proficiency. On the other hand, not all effects of L2 learning can be attributed to proficiency. Rather, the differences in N400 onset and the post-N400 violation effects appear to reflect fundamental differences in L1–L2 processing.

[1]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Who's in Control? Proficiency and L1 Influence on L2 Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  T C Gunter,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: an electrophysiological investigation. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Eugene Zilberg,et al.  Peak and averaged bicoherence for different EEG patterns during general anaesthesia , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  Hiroki Nakata,et al.  An ERP Study of Second Language Learning after Childhood: Effects of Proficiency , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[6]  E. Peña,et al.  Description of multilingual participants who stutter. , 2013, Journal of fluency disorders.

[7]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[9]  E. Coderre,et al.  The timing and magnitude of Stroop interference and facilitation in monolinguals and bilinguals , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[10]  Rugg,et al.  Interpreting event-related brain potentials. , 2004 .

[11]  Alejandro Wainselboim,et al.  An ERP study of structural anomalies in native and semantic free artificial grammar: Evidence for shared processing mechanisms , 2013, Brain Research.

[12]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[14]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: an electrophysiological exploration in both languages of Spanish-English bilinguals. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  D. Tanner,et al.  Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension* , 2013, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[17]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  N. Phillips,et al.  Semantic priming in a first and second language: evidence from reaction time variability and event-related brain potentials , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[20]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: Implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[22]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure - An ERP study in adult learners , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[23]  Kerrie E. Elston-Güttler,et al.  The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[24]  Aaron J. Newman,et al.  An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection , 2007, NeuroImage.

[25]  A Revonsuo,et al.  Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  M. Rugg,et al.  1 Interpreting Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004 .

[27]  N. White,et al.  A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals , 2014, Psychological research.

[28]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[29]  U Hegerl,et al.  Event-related potentials: Do they reflect central serotonergic neurotransmission and do they predict clinical response to serotonin agonists? , 2001 .

[30]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  Second Language Acquisition of Gender Agreement in Explicit and Implicit Training Conditions: An Event-Related Potential Study. , 2010, Language learning.

[31]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[32]  Eraldo Paulesu,et al.  The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high‐proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Christine Weber-Fox,et al.  Event-related brain potential markers of high-language proficiency in adults , 2003, Brain and Language.

[34]  Sander Martens,et al.  Distracting the Mind Improves Performance: An ERP Study , 2010, PloS one.

[35]  D. Tanner,et al.  Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[36]  Benjamin V. Tucker,et al.  The effects of N-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences , 2011 .

[37]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Morphological Processing in a Second Language: Behavioral and Event-related Brain Potential Evidence for Storage and Decomposition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Ron Dumont,et al.  Test of Adolescent and Adult Language–Third Edition , 2008 .

[39]  Arturo E. Hernandez,et al.  Impact of language proficiency and orthographic transparency on bilingual word reading: An fMRI investigation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme Monitoring Study – early results and lessons for the future , 2009, BMC neurology.

[42]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Anatomical Substrates of Visual and Auditory Miniature Second-language Learning , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  D. Davidson,et al.  An inverse relation between event-related and time–frequency violation responses in sentence processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[44]  A. Keil,et al.  Neural mechanisms of evoked oscillations: Stability and interaction with transient events , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[45]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Renata Meuter,et al.  Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals , 1990, Brain and Language.

[49]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Early Setting of Grammatical Processing in the Bilingual Brain , 2003, Neuron.

[50]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Jacob Cohen The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[52]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[53]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition , 2001 .

[54]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Language effects in second language learners and proficient bilinguals investigated with event-related potentials , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[55]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[57]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[58]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Proficiency Differences in Syntactic Processing of Monolingual Native Speakers Indexed by Event-related Potentials , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.