A new method for gravity separation: Vibrating table gravity concentrator

Abstract This paper discusses recently developed gravity concentration equipment, namely vibrating table, and reports detailed descriptions of the equipment in terms of principles of design and their effects on operational parameters. Vibrating table originally combines the known physical phenomena of a teetered bed, resistance to water flow, vibration, and density differences. The resulting effect of these combined forces can also be manipulated by integrated settings of feed rate, solid %, plate inclination, and water rate. Following the detailed description of the equipment, mineral separation tests with two different chromite ores obtained from industrial applications were performed in order to investigate the performance of the laboratory scale vibrating table. While former chromite ore had low grade with complex mineralogy and inadequate liberation, the latter had high grade consisting of liberated lumpy chromite particles. Experimental studies were focused on investigating the effect of plate inclination, removal of slimes, ore type, size classification, and particle size on separation performance. Within the tests performed with −600 µm, −800 µm, and −1000 µm high grade chromite ores under certain conditions, it was observed that increase in particle size results in a dramatic increase in recovery, while % grade decreases slightly. In another test with high grade chromite ore, sustainable product qualities were achieved up to a recovery of 93.22% in comparison with the 66.08% achieved with a conventional shaking table, within and approx. 47–48% final grade level. Additionally, product grades and recoveries up to 50.20%–58.36% with deslimed −400 µm low grade chromite feed and 53.68%–67.45% with deslimed −200 µm low grade chromite feed were obtained, respectively.

[1]  M. C. Fuerstenau,et al.  Principles of mineral processing , 2003 .

[2]  a Gupta,et al.  Mineral processing design and operation , 2006 .

[3]  R. Burt,et al.  Gravity Concentration Technology , 1984 .

[4]  R Burt,et al.  The role of gravity concentration in modern processing plants , 1999 .

[5]  L. Filippov,et al.  Rare earths (La, Ce, Nd) and rare metals (Sn, Nb, W) as by-products of kaolin production – Part 2: Gravity processing of micaceous residues , 2017 .

[6]  E. G. Kelly,et al.  Introduction to Mineral Processing , 1982 .

[7]  Yunliang Zhao,et al.  Separation factor of shaking table for vanadium pre-concentration from stone coal , 2013 .

[8]  B. A. Wills,et al.  The shaking table concentrator — The influence of operating conditions and table parameters on mineral separation — The development of a mathematical model for normal operating conditions , 1991 .

[9]  T. Çiçek,et al.  Applicability of Mozley multigravity separator (MGS) to fine chromite tailings of Turkish chromite concentrating plants , 2002 .

[10]  K. Waters,et al.  Speed analysis of quartz and hematite particles in a spiral concentrator by PEPT , 2016 .

[11]  N. D. Rao,et al.  The feasibility of a slip velocity model for predicting the enrichment of chromite in a Floatex density separator , 2007 .

[12]  E. Maré,et al.  Developments in nonmagnetic physical separation technologies for hematitic/goethitic iron ore , 2015 .

[13]  Ranjeet Singh,et al.  Processing of coal fines using air fluidization in an air table , 2016 .

[14]  R. Papalia,et al.  Performance of a new centrifuge (Falcon) in concentrating a gold ore from texada island, B.C., Canada , 1992 .

[15]  M. K. Mallick,et al.  Preliminary studies on teeter bed separator for separation of manganese fines , 2013 .

[16]  A. R. Laplante,et al.  Advances in gravity gold technology , 2005 .

[17]  B. A. Wills,et al.  Wills' Mineral Processing Technology , 2005 .

[18]  S. Cierpisz A dynamic model of coal products discharge in a jig , 2017 .

[19]  Tuncay Uslu,et al.  Desulphurization and deashing of oxidized fine coal by Knelson concentrator , 2012 .

[20]  Kristian E. Waters,et al.  The potential for dense medium separation of mineral fines using a laboratory Falcon Concentrator , 2017 .

[21]  C. Duan,et al.  Hydrodynamic characteristics of the dense medium gas–solid fluidized bed for coal beneficiation and cleaning , 2016 .

[22]  Yuemin Zhao,et al.  Effects of characteristics of clapboard unit on separation of < 6 mm fine coal in a compound dry separator , 2017 .

[23]  C. Bergmann,et al.  Using mineralogical characterisation and process modelling to simulate the gravity recovery of ferrochrome fines , 2016 .