Evidence and Warrants for Belief in a College Astronomy Course

Science educators have argued that it is insufficient to be able to recite thetheories of science and not know how knowledge claims in science are justified, what counts as evidence, or how theory and evidence interact. We wonder, however, how much students' understandings of the nature of science vary with content. This paper draws on data collected in a university astronomy course. Data include three interviews and written work from twenty students, as well as written work from the 340 students in the class. This study provides us with evidence on how students' talk and writing about the nature of science differs depending on the particular scientific topic which is under discussion. The relationship between theory and evidence, warrants for belief, and nature of observation are described in various ways in the different disciplines discussed in the course.

[1]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[2]  W. B. Stanley,et al.  Teaching sciences: The multicultural question revisited , 2001 .

[3]  James A. Whitson,et al.  Practical reasoning and science education: Implications for theory and practice , 1993 .

[4]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[5]  Z. Dagher,et al.  Diversity of Students' Views about Evidence, Theory, and the Interface between Science and Religion in an Astronomy Course , 2000 .

[6]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[7]  Z. Dagher,et al.  Changes in Student Views of Religion and Science in a College Astronomy Course , 2002 .

[8]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1984 .

[9]  R. Bernstein Beyond objectivism and relativism , 1983 .

[10]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[11]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[12]  Ala Samarapungavan,et al.  Children's judgments in theory choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood , 1992, Cognition.

[13]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[14]  M. R. Matthews Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[15]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[16]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  From “truth” to “invented reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge , 1997 .

[17]  S. Norris Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content‐transcendent goals of science education , 1997 .