The effects of teacher collaboration in Grade 9 Applied Mathematics

The current emphasis of many mathematics education reform documents is on the need to change the environment of mathematics classrooms from the transmission of knowledge by the teacher to the transaction of knowledge between the teacher and the students which promotes mathematical investigation and exploration. In this article, we discuss the details of a Collaborative Teacher Inquiry Project which was aimed at increasing the quality of learning of Grade 9 Applied Mathematics, while at the same time, improving professional development opportunities for the teachers. A total of 11 schools participated in this project which spanned over three semesters. Participants included teachers, department heads, curriculum leaders, and administrators. Each school created an implementation team of administrators and teachers to implement collaborative strategies and improve teaching and learning in Grade 9 Applied Mathematics. The main benefit to the participants was that they were able to increase their knowledge and skills through collaboration in six interconnected areas: (a) achieving the goals, (b) student success, (c) professional development, (d) co-planning and co-teaching opportunities, (e) increased communication, and (f) improved technological skills. Bringing in different partners to achieve a common goal was the most challenging aspect of the project.

[1]  M. Fullan.  Large-scale reform comes of age , 2009 .

[2]  Rochelle Gutiérrez,et al.  Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: understanding their influence on student advancement , 1996 .

[3]  E. Quellmalz.  Needed: Better Methods for Testing Higher-Order Thinking Skills. , 1985 .

[4]  A. Schoenfeld.  Making Mathematics Work for All Children: Issues of Standards, Testing, and Equity , 2002 .

[5]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Inside Teaching: How Classroom Life Undermines Reform , 2005 .

[6]  Robert Ackland,et al.  A Review of the Peer Coaching Literature. , 1991 .

[7]  Robert Eaker,et al.  Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement , 1998 .

[8]  Kimberly Barry,et al.  School Improvement Programs , 2009 .

[9]  I. Horn.  Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers' Conversations , 2007 .

[10]  M. Haberman.  Can Star Teachers Create Learning Communities , 2004 .

[11]  Rebecca DuFour,et al.  On common ground : the power of professional learning communities , 2005 .

[12]  Daniel P. Liston,et al.  Teaching Student Teachers to Reflect , 1987 .

[13]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Learning on the Job: A Situated Account of Teacher Learning in High School Mathematics Departments , 2005 .

[14]  Denise Dallmer.  Collaborative Relationships in Teacher Education: A Personal Narrative of Conflicting Roles , 2004 .

[15]  B. Achinstein,et al.  Conflict Amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration. , 2002 .

[16]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[17]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Collaborative Research: Working With, Not Working On. . . , 1986 .

[18]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Artisan Model of Teaching , 2002 .

[19]  Loretta Kasper,et al.  New Technologies, New Literacies: Focus Discipline Research and ESL Learning Communities , 2000 .

[20]  J. Little,et al.  Professional community and the problem of high school reform , 2002 .

[21]  J. Little.  Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success , 1982 .

[22]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[23]  Leslie Santee Siskin,et al.  The Subjects in Question: Departmental Organization and the High School. The Series on School Reform. , 1995 .

[24]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[25]  Liping Ma,et al.  Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States , 2010 .

[26]  Yong-lin Moon.  Education reform and competency-based education , 2007 .

[27]  Sara Delamont,et al.  Qualitative studies in education , 1995 .

[28]  Richard DuFour,et al.  What Is a "Professional Learning Community"? , 2004 .

[29]  Marilyn Johnston,et al.  Experience and reflections on collaborative research , 1990 .

[30]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Attending to Problems of Practice: Routines and Resources for Professional Learning in Teachers’ Workplace Interactions , 2010 .

[31]  Louise Stoll,et al.  Professional Learning Community , 2010 .

[32]  B. Showers,et al.  Teachers Coaching Teachers. , 1985 .

[33]  M. Eraut.  Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[34]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[35]  Bruce Joyce,et al.  The Coaching of Teaching. , 1982 .

[36]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[37]  Shirley M. Hord,et al.  A Synthesis of Research on Organizational Collaboration. , 1986 .

[38]  J. Oakes,et al.  Collaborative Inquiry: A Congenial Paradigm in a Cantankerous World , 1985, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[39]  C. Coburn,et al.  Framing the Problem of Reading Instruction: Using Frame Analysis to Uncover the Microprocesses of Policy Implementation , 2006 .

[40]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[41]  Jennifer I. Berne,et al.  Chapter 6 : Teacher Learning and the Acquisition of Professional Knowledge: An Examination of Research on Contemporary Professlonal Development , 1999 .

[42]  K. Osterman,et al.  Reflective Practice for Educators: Improving Schooling through Professional Development. , 1993 .

[43]  Deborah P. Britzman.  Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach, Deborah P. Britzman. 1991. State University of New York, Albany, NY. ISBN: 0-7914-0568-0 (hc); 0-7914-0569-9 (pb). $54.50 (hc); $17.95.(pb , 1993 .

[44]  C. Clark,et al.  Collaboration as Dialogue: Teachers and Researchers Engaged in Conversation and Professional Development , 1996 .

[45]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[46]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Professionalism and Community: Perspectives on Reforming Urban Schools, Karen Seashore Louis and Sharon D. Druse. 1995. Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. 272 pages. ISBN: 0-8039-6252-5 (hc); 0-8039-6253-3 (pb). $49.95 (hc); $24.95(pb , 1995 .