The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

[1]  C. Lumer.  The Epistemic Inferiority of Pragma-Dialectics – Reply to Botting , 2012 .

[2]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[3]  Het identificeren van enkelvoudige argumentatie. , 1984 .

[4]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments , 1997 .

[5]  Functions of repetition in informal discussions , 1996 .

[6]  Gerald J. Massey.  Are There Any Good Arguments That Bad Arguments Are Bad , 1975 .

[7]  S. Jackson,et al.  Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse , 1993 .

[8]  C. Andone.  Argumentation in Political Interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency , 2013 .

[9]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: , 2011 .

[10]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[11]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Dialog theory for critical argumentation , 2007, Controversis.

[12]  Andrea A. Lunsford,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies , 2009 .

[13]  David A. Frank.  Argumentation Studies in the Wake of the New Rhetoric , 2004 .

[14]  B. Amjarso.  Mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument: a conceptual and empirical study of the persuasiveness of a mode of strategic manoeuvring , 2010 .

[15]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[16]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Boekbeoordeling [A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion (proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam), Amsterdam: SICSAT, 1992] , 1993 .

[17]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  Argumentation in Practice , 2005 .

[18]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[19]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Plausible argument in everyday conversation , 1992 .

[20]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[21]  Séverine Autesserre.  Peaceland: An Ethnographic Approach , 2014 .

[22]  Y. Tonnard.  Getting an issue on the table: A pragma-dialectical study of presentational choices in confrontational strategic maneuvering in Dutch parliamentary debate , 2006 .

[23]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , 1999 .

[24]  D. Walton.  Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance , 1999 .

[25]  J. S. Vos.  Paul's Argumentation in Galatians 1–2 , 1994, Harvard Theological Review.

[26]  J. Verschueren.  Pragmatics at issue , 1991 .

[27]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[28]  David Botting.  A Pragma-Dialectical Default on the Question of Truth , 2010 .

[29]  M. Lewiński.  Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring in reacting critically , 2010 .

[30]  Isabela Ieţcu-Fairclough.  Legitimation and Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Field , 2008 .

[31]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  William the Silent's Argumentative Discourse , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[32]  John E. Woods,et al.  The death of argument - fallacies in agent based reasoning , 2004, Applied logic series.

[33]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[34]  B. Garssen,et al.  The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks , 2012 .

[35]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[36]  F. Zenker.  Pragma-Dialectic’s Necessary Conditions for a Critical Discussion , 2007 .

[37]  C. Ilie.  Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates , 2003 .

[38]  It takes two to tango , 2003 .

[39]  Eveline T. Feteris,et al.  Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation, A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions , 1999, Argumentation Library.

[40]  C. Andone.  Maneuvering strategically in a political interview: analyzing and evaluating responses to an accusation of inconsistency , 2010 .

[41]  Lilian Bermejo-Luque,et al.  Giving Reasons, A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory , 2011, Argumentation Library.

[42]  Andrea Rocci,et al.  Towards a Definition of Communication Context. Foundations of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Communication , 2006 .

[43]  T. V. Haaften.  Ihnen Jory, C. (2012). Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates. Instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the Second Reading of the British Parliament. , 2014 .

[44]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[45]  José Plug,et al.  Indicators of obiter dicta. A pragma-dialectical analysis of textual clues for the reconstruction of legal argumentation , 2000, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[46]  M. A. van Rees,et al.  The adequacy of speech act theory for explaining conversational phenomena: A response to some conversation analytical critics , 1992 .

[47]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective. , 1991 .

[48]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Advances in Pragma Dialectics , 2002 .

[49]  Ch. Perelman.  The New Rhetoric , 1957 .

[50]  Ralph H. Johnson.  The Dialectical Tier Revisited , 2003 .

[51]  Pragma-dialectics and Beyond , 2003 .

[52]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[53]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[54]  W. Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  Begging the question , 1999 .

[55]  Robert Trapp,et al.  Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric , 1990 .

[56]  A. Lunsford,et al.  Rhetorics and Roadmaps , 2008 .

[57]  Peter William Wise.  Writing at noon , 2002 .

[58]  F. H. Eemeren.  Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. , 2002 .

[59]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool , 2002 .

[60]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Handbook of communication and social interaction skills , 2003 .

[61]  Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument , 2001 .

[62]  3. Let’s talk: Emotion and the pragma-dialectic model , 2005 .

[63]  Frank I. Michelman,et al.  Between Facts and Norms , 1992 .

[64]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Fundamentals Of Argumentation Theory , 1996 .

[65]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  The (Un)Reasonableness of Ad Hominem Fallacies , 2000 .

[66]  Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point , 2012 .

[67]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[68]  Carla Bazzanella.  Repetition in dialogue , 1996 .

[69]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Across the Lines of Disciplines , 1987 .

[70]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[71]  D. Mohammed.  The honourable Gentleman should make up his mind: Strategic Manoeuvring with Accusations of Inconsistency in Prime Minister's Question Time , 2009 .

[72]  E. Weigand.  Dialogue and rhetoric , 2008 .

[73]  Peter Houtlosser,et al.  Dialectic and Rhetoric , 2002 .

[74]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation , 2002 .

[75]  K. L. Pike.  Etic and emic standpoints for the description of behavior. , 1967 .

[76]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework , 2000 .

[77]  E. Krabbe,et al.  Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: , 2010 .

[78]  J. A. Laar.  Pragmatic Inconsistency and Credibility , 2007 .

[79]  M. Agnes van Rees,et al.  Dissociation In Argumentative Discussions, A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective , 2009, Argumentation Library.

[80]  A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  Manoeuvring Strategically with Rhetorical Questions , 2009, Pondering on Problems of Argumentation.

[81]  J. M. Gerlofs,et al.  The use of conditionals in argumentation : a proposal for the analysis and evaluation of argumentatively used conditionals , 2009 .

[82]  Pragma-Dialetics Epistemologized: Reply to Lumer , 2012 .

[83]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Reconstruction and application , 1995 .

[84]  Christian Kock.  Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation , 2003 .

[85]  Hanns Hohmann,et al.  Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives , 2000 .

[86]  A. F. S. Henkemans,et al.  Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren , 2011 .

[87]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[88]  Assimakis Tseronis,et al.  Qualifying Standpoints: Stance adverbs as a presentational device for managing the burden of proof , 2009 .

[89]  Robert M Kaplan,et al.  Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[90]  H. Siegel,et al.  In Defense of the Objective Epistemic Approach to Argumentation , 2008 .

[91]  Rupert Crawshay-Williams.  Methods and Criteria of Reasoning: An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy , 2001 .

[92]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[93]  C. Andone.  Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory , 2011 .

[94]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Anyone Who Has a View , 2003 .

[95]  Frans H. van Eemeren.  In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[96]  M. Agnes van Rees,et al.  Analysing and evaluating problem-solving discussions , 1995 .

[97]  H. Hohmann.  Rhetoric and Dialectic , 2002 .

[98]  Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  Analysing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion , 1992 .

[99]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment In Dialogue , 1995 .

[100]  G. Miller,et al.  Perspectives on argumentation , 1966 .

[101]  Joanne L. Martin,et al.  A Retrospective , 1988 .

[102]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion (vertaling in het Russisch) , 1984 .

[103]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  The Skill of Identifying Argumentation. , 1989 .

[104]  Douglas Walton,et al.  The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument , 1998 .

[105]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Dialectical analysis as a normative reconstruction of argumentative discourse , 1986 .

[106]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[107]  K Graham.  Proceedings of Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , 1999 .

[108]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Democracy and Argumentation , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[109]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Proceedings of the Fith Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation , 2003 .

[110]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  An Evolutionary Approach , 2004 .

[111]  Christoph Lumer,et al.  Pragma-Dialectics and the Function of Argumentation , 2010 .

[112]  S. Morasso.  Argumentation in dispute mediation : a reasonable way to handle conflict , 2011 .

[113]  P. Hall,et al.  Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms , 1996 .

[114]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[115]  C. Tindale.  Acts of arguing : a rhetorical model of argument , 1999 .

[116]  P. Coirier,et al.  Foundations of argumentative text processing , 2000 .

[117]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  Boekbeoordeling [John Woods & Douglas N. Walton, Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982, Dordrecht: Foris, 1989] , 1991 .

[118]  Douglas Walton.  Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation , 1991 .

[119]  A. F. S. Henkemans.  The contribution of praeteritio to arguers’ confrontational strategic manoeuvres , 2009 .

[120]  Dissociation in Argumentative Discussions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective , 2008 .

[121]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument , 2005 .

[122]  G. Kennedy.  A new history of classical rhetoric , 1994 .

[123]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  From Analysis to Presentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Writing Argumentative Texts , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[124]  F. V. Eemeren,et al.  Solving potential disputes in health brochures with pragmatic argumentation , 2011 .

[125]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[126]  H. Jansen.  E Contrario Reasoning: The Dilemma of the Silent Legislator , 2005 .

[127]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Argumentative Indicators in Discourse, A Pragma-Dialectical Study , 2007, Argumentation Library.

[128]  D. Hymes.  Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[129]  Erik C. W. Krabbe,et al.  From axiom to dialogue , 1982 .

[130]  E. Feteris.  A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context , 2002 .

[131]  B. Garssen.  Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation: Walton, Douglas N., John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2007, p. 307 , 2009 .

[132]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness, Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules , 2009, Argumentation Library.

[133]  Noam Chomsky.  Language and thought , 1993 .

[134]  Jean H. M. Wagemans,et al.  The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion , 2011 .

[135]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Studies in Pragma-dialectics , 1994 .

[136]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics , 1990, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[137]  Understanding argument schemes , 2002 .

[138]  J. Searle,et al.  Expression and Meaning. , 1982 .

[139]  M. Palmer,et al.  A case in point. , 2009, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[140]  Christopher W. Tindale,et al.  Acts of Arguing , 1999 .

[141]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[142]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Argumentation Studies' Five Estates , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[143]  R. Wodak.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2003 .

[144]  Alec Fisher,et al.  The logic of real arguments: Philosophical assumptions , 2004 .

[145]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation , 2003 .

[146]  H. H. Clark.  Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[147]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[148]  Identification of unexpressed premises and argumentation schemes by students in secondary school , 1995 .

[149]  B. Garssen,et al.  A Pragma-Dialectical Response to Objectivist Epistemic Challenges , 2010 .

[150]  P. Houtlosser,et al.  Considering Pragma-Dialectics , 2014 .

[151]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[152]  A. F. Snoeck Henkemans,et al.  What's in a name? The use of the stylistic device metonymy as a strategic manoeuvre in the confrontation and argumentation stages of a discussion. , 2006 .

[153]  John E. Woods.  The Death of Argument , 2004 .

[154]  A. F. S. Henkemans.  Shared medical decision-making: strategic maneuvering by doctors in the presentation of their treatment preferences to patients , 2011 .

[155]  D. Walton.  The new dialectic , 1998 .

[156]  F. H. Eemeren,et al.  Speech acts in argumentative discussions , 1984 .

[157]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research , 2012 .

[158]  F. H. van Eemeren,et al.  Analysis and evaluation , 1995 .

[159]  H. Siegel,et al.  The pragma-dialectician's dilemma: Reply to Garssen and van Laar , 2010 .

[160]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  In Varietate Concordia - United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[161]  Frans H. van Eemeren,et al.  Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring , 2009, Pondering on Problems of Argumentation.

[162]  T. V. Dijk.  Discourse studies : a multidisciplinary introduction , 2011 .

[163]  Rob Grootendorst,et al.  Analyzing Argumentative Discourse , 2015, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.

[164]  S. Levinson.  Activity types and language , 1979, Linguistics.

[165]  Argumentative discourse as a form of social interaction: implications for dialectical reconstruction , 1995 .

[166]  M. Gerber.  Pragmatism, Pragma-Dialectics, and Methodology: Toward a More Ethical Notion of Argument Criticism , 2011 .

[167]  J. Blair.  Pragma-Dialectics and Pragma-Dialectics , 2012 .

[168]  José H Plug,et al.  Indicators of Obiter Dicta , 1997 .

[169]  Van Poppel.  Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! A pragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures , 2013 .

[170]  G. Kress.  Communication and Culture , 1998 .

[171]  F. V. Eemeren.  The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion , 2012 .