Multi-Organ Gland Segmentation Using Deep Learning

Clinical morphological analysis of histopathology samples is an effective method in cancer diagnosis. Computational pathology methods can be employed to automate this analysis, providing improved objectivity and scalability. More specifically, computational techniques can be used in segmenting glands, which is an essential factor in cancer diagnosis. Automatic delineation of glands is a challenging task considering a large variability in glandular morphology across tissues and pathological subtypes. A deep learning based gland segmentation method can be developed to address the above task, but it requires a large number of accurate gland annotations from several tissue slides. Such a large dataset need to be generated manually by experienced pathologists, which is laborious, time-consuming, expensive, and suffers from the subjectivity of the annotator. So far, deep learning techniques have produced promising results on a few organ-specific gland segmentation tasks, however, the demand for organ-specific gland annotations hinder the extensibility of these techniques to other organs. This work investigates the idea of cross-domain (-organ type) approximation that aims at reducing the need for organ-specific annotations. Unlike parenchyma, the stromal component of tissues, that lies between the glands, is more consistent across several organs. It is hypothesized that an automatic method, that can precisely segment the stroma, would pave the way for a cross-organ gland segmentation. Two proposed Dense-U-Nets are trained on H&E strained colon adenocarcinoma samples focusing on the gland and stroma segmentation. The trained networks are evaluated on two independent datasets, they are, a H&E stained colon adenocarcinoma dataset and a H&E stained breast invasive cancer dataset. The trained network targeting the stroma segmentation performs similar to the network targeting the gland segmentation on the colon dataset. Whereas, the former approach performs significantly better compared to the latter approach on the breast dataset, showcasing the higher generalization capacity of the stroma segmentation approach. The networks are evaluated using Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance computed between the ground truth gland masks and the predicted gland masks. The conducted experiments validate the efficacy of the proposed stoma segmentation approach toward multi-organ gland segmentation.

[1]  Yousef Al-Kofahi,et al.  Improved Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Histopathology Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Yang Li,et al.  Gland Instance Segmentation by Deep Multichannel Side Supervision , 2016, MICCAI.

[3]  A. Huisman,et al.  Automatic Nuclei Segmentation in H&E Stained Breast Cancer Histopathology Images , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Hanna M. Wallach,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: An Introduction , 2004 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automated Gland Segmentation and Classification for Gleason Grading of Prostate Tissue Images , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Jian Sun,et al.  Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks , 2016, ECCV.

[7]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Densely Connected Convolutional Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[8]  Martin Urschler,et al.  Segmentation and classification of colon glands with deep convolutional neural networks and total variation regularization , 2017, PeerJ.

[9]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Gland Segmentation and Computerized Gleason Grading of Prostate Histology by Integrating Low-, High-level and Domain Specific Information , 2007 .

[10]  Hao Chen,et al.  Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The glas challenge contest , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  Dipti Prasad Mukherjee,et al.  Gland segmentation from histology images using informative morphological scale space , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[12]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  Anindya Sarkar,et al.  Structure and Context in Prostatic Gland Segmentation and Classification , 2012, MICCAI.

[14]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Efficiently Inducing Features of Conditional Random Fields , 2002, UAI.

[15]  Stephen J. McKenna,et al.  Structure Prediction for Gland Segmentation With Hand-Crafted and Deep Convolutional Features , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[17]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Cigdem Demir,et al.  Graph Run-Length Matrices for Histopathological Image Segmentation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Structure-Preserving Color Normalization and Sparse Stain Separation for Histological Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Hao Chen,et al.  DCAN: Deep Contour-Aware Networks for Accurate Gland Segmentation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[22]  Jan Egger,et al.  PCG-Cut: Graph Driven Segmentation of the Prostate Central Gland , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  Hao Chen,et al.  MILD‐Net: Minimal information loss dilated network for gland instance segmentation in colon histology images , 2018, Medical Image Anal..