Student engagement in massive open online courses

Completion rates in massive open online courses MOOCs are disturbingly low. Existing analysis has focused on patterns of resource access and prediction of drop-out using learning analytics. In contrast, the effectiveness of teaching programs in traditional higher education HE settings internationally is increasingly assessed by surveys measuring student engagement. The conceptualisation of engagement used is much richer and more informative than the way the term is currently interpreted in the context of MOOCs. This paper considers MOOC participation, learning and drop-out in the context of this richer conceptualisation of student engagement. MOOC pedagogy and practice are examined and we evaluate how far HE engagement measures can be successfully used in the MOOC context. We identify the need for a MOOC engagement model and suggest recommendations for basic, initial steps which MOOC developers can make towards improving engagement.

[1]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Capturing "attrition intensifying" structural traits from didactic interaction sequences of MOOC learners , 2014, EMNLP 2014.

[2]  Stephen R. Porter.  Do College Student Surveys Have Any Validity? , 2011 .

[3]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  “ Turn on , Tune in , Drop out ” : Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses , 2013 .

[4]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  A Tale of Two Modes: Initial Reflections on an Innovative MOOC , 2014, LTEC@KMO.

[5]  B. Burt,et al.  Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical approaches for Diverse Populations. (2nd edition) , 2009 .

[6]  Hugh C. Davis,et al.  Engaged Learning in MOOCs: A Study Using the UK Engagement Survey. , 2015 .

[7]  B. Burt,et al.  Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations (2nd Edition) ed. by Stephen John Quaye and Shaun R. Harper , 2015 .

[8]  Mordechai Ben-Ari.  MOOCs on introductory programming: a travelogue , 2013, INROADS.

[9]  Dianne H.B. Welsh,et al.  The New Generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCS) and Entrepreneurship Education , 2013 .

[10]  Paul D. Umbach,et al.  Faculty do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement , 2005 .

[11]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  What (Use) is a MOOC? , 2013, LTEC.

[12]  Jonathan Rosewell,et al.  The OpenupEd quality label: benchmarks for MOOCs , 2014 .

[13]  Yvonne Belanger,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[14]  Meghan Ecclestone,et al.  MOOCs as a Professional Development Tool for Librarians , 2013 .

[15]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[16]  Cathy Sandeen.  Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era , 2013 .

[17]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Engagement Measures in Massive Open Online Courses , 2015, LTEC@KMO.

[18]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[19]  Philip G. Altbach,et al.  MOOCs as Neocolonialism: Who Controls Knowledge? , 2014 .

[20]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming , 2012, SIGITE '12.

[21]  Shirley Williams,et al.  The impact and reach of MOOCs: a developing countries’ perspective , 2013 .

[22]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[23]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? , 2013 .

[24]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[25]  Vicki Trowler.  Student engagement literature review , 2010 .

[26]  Patrick Aebischer,et al.  Boosting Higher Education in Africa through Shared Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2014 .

[27]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Learning Latent Engagement Patterns of Students in Online Courses , 2014, AAAI.

[28]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Perspectives on MOOC quality : An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project , 2014 .

[29]  Doug Clow,et al.  MOOCs and the funnel of participation , 2013, LAK '13.

[30]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Massive open online courses: a review of usage and evaluation , 2015, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[31]  Michael Nanfito,et al.  MOOCs: Opportunities,Impacts, and Challenges: Massive Open Online Courses in Colleges and Universities , 2013 .

[32]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How Effective are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes? , 2010 .

[33]  Jorge J. Wellmann.  The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2010 .

[34]  Lillian Corbin,et al.  Student engagement: rhetoric and reality , 2012 .

[35]  Timothy Read,et al.  Toward a Quality Model for UNED MOOCs , 2014 .

[36]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  Sometimes you need a reminder: the effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.