Rail Transit In America

This study evaluates rail transit benefits based on a comprehensive analysis of transportation system performance in major U.S. cities. It finds that cities with large, wellestablished rail systems have significantly higher per capita transit ridership, lower average per capita vehicle ownership and annual mileage, less traffic congestion, lower traffic death rates, lower consumer expenditures on transportation, and higher transit service cost recovery than otherwise comparable cities with less or no rail transit service. This indicates that rail transit systems provide economic, social and environmental benefits, and these benefits tend to increase as a system expands and matures. This report discusses best practices for evaluating transit benefits. It examines criticisms of rail transit investments, finding that many are based on inaccurate analysis. A condensed version of this report was published as, "Impacts of Rail Transit on the Performance of a Transportation System," Transportation Research Record 1930, Transportation Research Board (www.trb.org), 2005, pp. 23-29. Rail Transit In America: Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits Victoria Transport Policy Institute 1

[1]  M. J. H. Mogridge,et al.  Travel in Towns: Jam yesterday, jam today and jam tomorrow? , 1990 .

[2]  Richard Wener,et al.  Leave the Driving to Them: Comparing Stress of Car and Train Commuters , 2006 .

[3]  T. Garrett.  Light-Rail Transit in America POLICY ISSUES AND PROSPECTS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , 2004 .

[4]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[5]  Roger W. Vickerman,et al.  Policy and planning as public choice: Mass transit in the United States , 2000 .

[6]  T. Balaker,et al.  PAST PERFORMANCE VS. FUTURE HOPES: WILL URBAN RAIL IMPROVE MOBILITY IN NORTH CAROLINA? , 2004 .

[7]  H Dittmar.  IS RAIL TRANSIT RIGHT FOR YOUR COMMUNITY? ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS; MEASURING THE BENEFITS , 1995 .

[8]  Todd Litman.  LAND USE IMPACT COSTS OF TRANSPORTATION , 1995 .

[9]  B. Podobnik.  The Social and Environmental Achievements of New Urbanism : Evidence from Orenco Station , 2002 .

[10]  ECONorthwest,et al.  Estimating the Benefits and Costs of Public Transit Projects: A Guidebook for Practitioners , 2002 .

[11]  John W Schumann.  Assessing Transit Changes in Columbus, Ohio, and Sacramento, California: Progress and Survival in Two State Capitals, 1985–2002 , 2005 .

[12]  Kevin A. Hassett,et al.  CONSERVING ENERGY AND PRESERVING THE ENVIRONMENT: THE ROLE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION , 2002 .

[13]  Todd Litman,et al.  MEASURING TRANSPORTATION: TRAFFIC, MOBILITY, AND ACCESSIBILITY , 2003 .

[14]  Kittelson,et al.  A Guidebook for Developing a Transit Performance-Measurement System , 2003 .

[15]  Randal O'Toole.  Great Rail Disasters: The Impact of Rail Transit on Urban Livability , 2004 .

[16]  R. Prud’homme,et al.  Size, Sprawl, Speed and the Efficiency of Cities , 1999 .

[17]  R. Cervero.  Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies , 2006 .

[18]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Traditional Neighborhoods and Auto Ownership , 2001 .

[19]  C. Hass-Klau,et al.  Economic impact of light rail - the results of 15 urban areas in France, Germany, UK and North America , 2004 .

[20]  C. Winston,et al.  The Effect of Government Highway Spending on Road Users' Congestion Costs , 2006 .

[21]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX , 2005 .

[22]  Graham Currie,et al.  Bus Transit Oriented Development—Strengths and Challenges Relative to Rail , 2006 .

[23]  H. Dittmar,et al.  The new transit town : best practices in transit-oriented development , 2004 .

[24]  Todd Litman,et al.  Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs: Best Practices Guidebook , 2004 .

[25]  Robert Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA , 2004 .

[26]  S Ryan,et al.  METROPOLITAN RAIL TRANSIT EXPANSION: EXPLORING A ROUTE FOR DECISION MAKING , 2001 .

[27]  Lyndon Henry,et al.  Evaluating new start transit program performance: Comparing rail and bus , 2006 .

[28]  W Cox,et al.  LIGHT RAIL: BOON OR BOONDOGGLE , 2000 .

[29]  Y. Li,et al.  EVALUATING THE URBAN COMMUTE EXPERIENCE: A TIME PERCEPTION APPROACH , 2003 .

[30]  Vukan R Vuchic,et al.  Urban Transit : Operations, Planning and Economics , 2005 .

[31]  Jeffery J. Smith,et al.  Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography , 2006 .

[32]  J. E. E. Iv,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES: INTERIM HANDBOOK , 2000 .

[33]  Christopher E. Ferrell,et al.  TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND PROSPECTS , 2004 .

[34]  R Phillips,et al.  MULTI-MODAL QUALITY OF SERVICE PROJECT , 2001 .

[35]  D. Lewis,et al.  Policy and Planning as Public Choice: Mass Transit in the United States , 1999 .

[36]  Graham Currie,et al.  The demand performance of bus rapid transit , 2005 .

[37]  M. Cropper,et al.  The Impact of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States , 2003 .

[38]  Paul M Weyrich,et al.  TWELVE ANTI-TRANSIT MYTHS: A CONSERVATIVE CRITIQUE , 2001 .

[39]  David J. Forkenbrock,et al.  GUIDEBOOK FOR ASSESSING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[40]  R. Hall,et al.  Effects of the Los Angeles transit strike on highway congestion , 2006 .

[41]  Edson L Tennyson.  IMPACT ON TRANSIT PATRONAGE OF CESSATION OR INAUGURATION OF RAIL SERVICE , 1989 .

[42]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Current Benefits and Optimal Level of Provision , 2006 .

[43]  R. Wener,et al.  Commuting Stress: Psychophysiological Effects of a Trip and Spillover into the Workplace , 2005 .