Innovation and Location: A Case Study of Sony's Vaio Laptop

This article investigates the question of why innovation has been geographically concentrated. Although many past studies of regional institutions, social networks, and tacit knowledge have provided insight into this question, they have done little to probe the engineering and technical aspects of the phenomenon of the placerootedness of innovation. This study approaches this question through an empirical analysis of innovation at the micro-scale, a case study in the product development of Sony’s Vaio 505 laptop. It uncovers three specific features in the process of innovation: complexity, the interdisciplinary development of technology, and prototyping and testing. Each of these engineering and technical aspects requires the co-location of the engineers and managers of the innovation project.

[1]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  M. Fransman.  Visions of innovation : the firm and Japan , 1999 .

[3]  M. Ivimey.  Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.

[4]  Elizabeth Currid.  The Warhol economy : how fashion, art, and music drive New York City , 2007 .

[5]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Learning By Doing and the Choice of Technology , 1994 .

[6]  M. Danson.  Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[7]  D. Hugh Whittaker,et al.  The Japanese Enterprise System: Competitive Strategies and Cooperative Structures. , 1992 .

[8]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Japan's Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change , 2007 .

[9]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Ronald Dore,et al.  The Japanese firm : the sources of competitive strength , 1997 .

[13]  N. Lowe.  Challenging Tradition: Unlocking New Paths to Regional Industrial Upgrading , 2009 .

[14]  E. Lincoln,et al.  Japan's Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (review) , 2004 .

[15]  Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[17]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[18]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[19]  M. Storper,et al.  The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of US Patent Citations, 1975–1997 , 2008 .

[20]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[21]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Economic geography: the great half-century , 2000 .

[22]  Sigvald Harryson.  Japanese Technology and Innovation Management: From Know-How to Know-Who , 1998 .

[23]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[24]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Towards a Knowledge‐based Theory of the Geographical Cluster , 2001 .

[25]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Entrepreneurial Support Networks: Evidence from Semiconductor Initial Public Offerings from 1996 through 2000 , 2003 .

[26]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[27]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[28]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The Business Governance of Localized Knowledge: An Information Economics Approach for the Economics of Knowledge , 2006 .

[29]  Nick Henry,et al.  From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters’: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations , 2003 .

[30]  Philip McCann,et al.  Clusters and regional development: Some cautionary observations from the semiconductor industry , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[31]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[32]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[33]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[34]  Sadanori Arimura,et al.  How Matsushita Electric and Sony Manage Global R&D , 1999 .

[35]  A. Faggian,et al.  Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes , 2005 .

[36]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[37]  M. Aoki.  Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy: A Microtheory of the Japanese Economy , 1988 .

[38]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[39]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[40]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[41]  Matthew Zook.  The knowledge brokers: venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development , 2004 .

[42]  Nalini Ratnasiri,et al.  Research for Development , 2006 .

[43]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[44]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[45]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. , 1994, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[46]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[47]  Ann Markusen,et al.  Studying Regions by Studying Firms , 1994 .

[48]  J. Hougland,et al.  Knowledge Works: Managing Intellectual Capital at Toshiba , 1997 .

[49]  竹内 弘高,et al.  Japan, moving toward a more advanced knowledge economy , 2006 .

[50]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[51]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[52]  Local Agglomeration and Global Networks Of the Semiconductor Industry: a Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Firms , 2001 .

[53]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[54]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .