Participation in ICT-Enabled Meetings

Meetings are a common occurrence in contemporary organizations. The authors' exploratory study at Intel, an innovative global technology company, suggests that meetings are evolving beyond their familiar definition as the pervasive use of information and communication technologies ICTs changes work practices associated with meetings. Drawing on data gathered from interviews prompted by entries in the employees' electronic calendar system, the authors examine the multiple ways in which meetings build and reflect work in the organization and derive propositions to guide future research. Specifically, the authors identify four aspects of meetings that reflect work in the 21st century: meetings are integral to work in team-centered organizations, tension between group and personal objectives, discontinuities, and ICT support for fragmented work environment.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[2]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[3]  David Straus,et al.  How to Make Meetings Work , 1993 .

[4]  J. Tropman Effective Meetings: Improving Group Decision-Making , 1980 .

[5]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[6]  H. Schwartzman The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. , 1986 .

[7]  H. Schwartzman The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities , 1989 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[9]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[12]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[13]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[15]  J. Burn,et al.  Work Perceptions Among Hong Kong and United States I/S Workers: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 1995 .

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Technology Transition Model Derived from Field Investigation of GSS Use Aboard the U.S.S. CORONADO , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Engle Book Review: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) , 1999 .

[18]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Time in Organizational Studies: Towards a New Research Direction , 1999 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[20]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[22]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Wired Meetings: Technological Mediation of Organizational Gatherings , 2001 .

[23]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The rise of knowledge towards attention management , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  S. Sonnentag High performance and meeting participation: An observational study in software design teams. , 2001 .

[26]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Time: A New Research Lens , 2001 .

[27]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[28]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Developing Groupware for Requirements Negotiation: Lessons Learned , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[29]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Metaphors of virtuality: shaping an emergent reality , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Information systems development by US-Norwegian virtual teams: implications of time and space , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  France Bélanger,et al.  Exploring communication-based work processes in virtual work environments , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using group support systems for strategic planning with the United States Air Force , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  Idea-generation in naturally occurring contexts complex: Appropriation of a simple group procedure , 2003 .

[39]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Electronic Banking and Information Assurance Issues: Surveys and Synthesis , 2004, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[42]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[43]  Michael C. Mankins Stop wasting valuable time. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[44]  Michael Maccoby El poder de la transferencia: por qué la gente sigue al líder , 2004 .

[45]  A. Majchrzak Virtual Workspace Technology Use and Knowledge-Sharing Effectiveness in Distributed Teams : The Influence of a Team ’ s Transactive Memory , 2004 .

[46]  A. Luong,et al.  Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees. , 2005 .

[47]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Face-to-face interactions in self-organizing distributed teams. , 2005 .

[48]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  "Not another meeting!" Are meeting time demands related to employee well-being? , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Intentions to Use Information Technologies: An Integrative Model , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[50]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Conditions Enabling Effective Multiple Team Membership , 2007, Virtuality and Virtualization.

[51]  Steve Clarke,et al.  End User Computing Challenges and Technologies: Emerging Tools and Applications , 2007 .

[52]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[53]  Steve Clarke,et al.  End-user Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications , 2008 .

[54]  David F. Rico Optimizing the ROI of Enterprise Architecture Using Real Options , 2008 .

[55]  Russell Haines,et al.  The Influence of workspace awareness on group intellective decision effectiveness , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  K. Stephens,et al.  The Social Influences on Electronic Multitasking in Organizational Meetings , 2009 .

[57]  Mark Mortensen,et al.  Go (Con)Figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Yuan Li,et al.  Exploring the Dimensions and Effects of Computer Software Similarities in Computer Skills Transfer , 2011, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[59]  Steve Clarke,et al.  Innovative Strategies and Approaches for End-User Computing Advancements , 2012 .