Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach

OBJECTIVE In the modern healthcare system, rapidly expanding costs/complexity, the growing myriad of treatment options, and exploding information streams that often do not effectively reach the front lines hinder the ability to choose optimal treatment decisions over time. The goal in this paper is to develop a general purpose (non-disease-specific) computational/artificial intelligence (AI) framework to address these challenges. This framework serves two potential functions: (1) a simulation environment for exploring various healthcare policies, payment methodologies, etc., and (2) the basis for clinical artificial intelligence - an AI that can "think like a doctor". METHODS This approach combines Markov decision processes and dynamic decision networks to learn from clinical data and develop complex plans via simulation of alternative sequential decision paths while capturing the sometimes conflicting, sometimes synergistic interactions of various components in the healthcare system. It can operate in partially observable environments (in the case of missing observations or data) by maintaining belief states about patient health status and functions as an online agent that plans and re-plans as actions are performed and new observations are obtained. This framework was evaluated using real patient data from an electronic health record. RESULTS The results demonstrate the feasibility of this approach; such an AI framework easily outperforms the current treatment-as-usual (TAU) case-rate/fee-for-service models of healthcare. The cost per unit of outcome change (CPUC) was $189 vs. $497 for AI vs. TAU (where lower is considered optimal) - while at the same time the AI approach could obtain a 30-35% increase in patient outcomes. Tweaking certain AI model parameters could further enhance this advantage, obtaining approximately 50% more improvement (outcome change) for roughly half the costs. CONCLUSION Given careful design and problem formulation, an AI simulation framework can approximate optimal decisions even in complex and uncertain environments. Future work is described that outlines potential lines of research and integration of machine learning algorithms for personalized medicine.

[1]  Andrew J. Schaefer,et al.  Modeling hospital discharge policies for patients with pneumonia-related sepsis , 2008 .

[2]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  A tutorial on partially observable Markov decision processes , 2009 .

[3]  Anne-Laure Boulesteix,et al.  Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value , 2008, Bioinform..

[4]  Casey C. Bennett,et al.  Clinical Productivity System - A Decision Support Model , 2011, ArXiv.

[5]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[6]  Oguzhan Alagoz,et al.  Markov Decision Processes: A Tool for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  Barry L. Duncan,et al.  Using Formal Client Feedback to Improve Retention and Outcome: Making Ongoing, Real-time Assessment Feasible , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[9]  Andrew J. Schaefer,et al.  The Optimal Time to Initiate HIV Therapy Under Ordered Health States , 2008, Oper. Res..

[10]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Online Planning Algorithms for POMDPs , 2008, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[12]  S. Pauker,et al.  The Markov Process in Medical Prognosis , 1983, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  M Kim,et al.  A Markov decision process approach to temporal modulation of dose fractions in radiation therapy planning , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Casey C. Bennett,et al.  Data Mining and Electronic Health Records: Selecting Optimal Clinical Treatments in Practice , 2011, DMIN.

[15]  Casey C. Bennett,et al.  Data Mining Session-Based Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in a Mental Health Setting: Toward Data-Driven Clinical Decision Support and Personalized Treatment , 2011, 2011 IEEE First International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology.

[16]  A. Campbell,et al.  Outcome rating scale and session rating scale in psychological practice: clinical utility of ultra-brief measures , 2009 .

[17]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Review: A Primer on Aspects of Cognition for Medical Informatics , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[19]  Peter Szolovits,et al.  The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine , 2009, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[20]  I. Kohane The twin questions of personalized medicine: who are you and whom do you most resemble? , 2009, Genome Medicine.

[21]  Athanassios,et al.  Australia and New Zealand Health Policy Open Access Medical Decision Making for Patients with Parkinson Disease under Average Cost Criterion , 2022 .

[22]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[23]  James E. Stahl,et al.  Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26 (2): 131-148 , 2012 .

[24]  Kim-Leng Poh,et al.  Time-critical dynamic decision modeling in medicine , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  P. Meehl Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. , 1986, Journal of personality assessment.

[26]  Li Liu,et al.  Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers , 2007, Bioinform..

[27]  Milos Hauskrecht,et al.  Planning treatment of ischemic heart disease with partially observable Markov decision processes , 2000, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[28]  M. Bauer A review of quantitative studies of adherence to mental health clinical practice guidelines. , 2002, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[29]  Dambisa Moyo Winner Take All , 2013 .

[30]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Beyond pay for performance--emerging models of provider-payment reform. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review , 2004 .

[32]  J. Rodriguez,et al.  Problem (1) , 1994 .

[33]  Todd Hester and Peter Stone An Empirical Comparison of Abstraction in Models of Markov Decision Processes , 2009 .

[34]  Archis Ghate,et al.  A Markov decision process approach to multi-category patient scheduling in a diagnostic facility , 2011, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[35]  Andrew J. Schaefer,et al.  Modeling Medical Treatment Using Markov Decision Processes , 2005 .

[36]  T Y Leong,et al.  Dynamic decision modeling in medicine: a critique of existing formalisms. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[37]  Peter R. Orszag,et al.  The challenge of rising health care costs--a view from the Congressional Budget Office. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Applying Multi-Agent Techniques to Cancer Modeling , 2011 .

[39]  A. Elstein,et al.  Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[41]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks , 2006, ISMB.

[42]  J. Tarpley,et al.  How long does it take to train a surgeon? , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.