A 3D Deep Learning System for Detecting Referable Glaucoma Using Full OCT Macular Cube Scans

Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop a 3D deep learning system from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) macular cubes to differentiate between referable and nonreferable cases for glaucoma applied to real-world datasets to understand how this would affect the performance. Methods There were 2805 Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) macula volumes (Macula protocol 512 × 128) of 1095 eyes from 586 patients at a single site that were used to train a fully 3D convolutional neural network (CNN). Referable glaucoma included true glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma, and high-risk suspects, based on qualitative fundus photographs, visual fields, OCT reports, and clinical examinations, including intraocular pressure (IOP) and treatment history as the binary (two class) ground truth. The curated real-world dataset did not include eyes with retinal disease or nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies. The cubes were first homogenized using layer segmentation with the Orion Software (Voxeleron) to achieve standardization. The algorithm was tested on two separate external validation sets from different glaucoma studies, comprised of Cirrus macular cube scans of 505 and 336 eyes, respectively. Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for the development dataset for distinguishing referable glaucoma was 0.88 for our CNN using homogenization, 0.82 without homogenization, and 0.81 for a CNN architecture from the existing literature. For the external validation datasets, which had different glaucoma definitions, the AUCs were 0.78 and 0.95, respectively. The performance of the model across myopia severity distribution has been assessed in the dataset from the United States and was found to have an AUC of 0.85, 0.92, and 0.95 in the severe, moderate, and mild myopia, respectively. Conclusions A 3D deep learning algorithm trained on macular OCT volumes without retinal disease to detect referable glaucoma performs better with retinal segmentation preprocessing and performs reasonably well across all levels of myopia. Translational Relevance Interpretation of OCT macula volumes based on normative data color distributions is highly influenced by population demographics and characteristics, such as refractive error, as well as the size of the normative database. Referable glaucoma, in this study, was chosen to include cases that should be seen by a specialist. This study is unique because it uses multimodal patient data for the glaucoma definition, and includes all severities of myopia as well as validates the algorithm with international data to understand generalizability potential.

[1]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  A feature agnostic approach for glaucoma detection in OCT volumes , 2018, PloS one.

[2]  Hiroshi Murata,et al.  Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning to Accurately Diagnose Early-Onset Glaucoma From Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Differential Effects of Aging in the Macular Retinal Layers, Neuroretinal Rim, and Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Lee,et al.  Glaucoma versus red disease: imaging and glaucoma diagnosis , 2012, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[5]  D. Friedman,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma , 2016, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[6]  Miguel Caixinha,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques in Clinical Vision Sciences , 2017, Current eye research.

[7]  Daniel B. Russakoff,et al.  Deep Learning for Prediction of AMD Progression: A Pilot Study. , 2019, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Douglas R. Anderson Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .

[9]  Jean-Claude Mwanza,et al.  Rates of abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer OCT scans in healthy myopic eyes: Cirrus versus RTVue. , 2012, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[10]  Xu Sun,et al.  Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Rate , 2019, ICLR.

[11]  Mohammad Saleh Miri A multimodal machine-learning graph-based approach for segmenting glaucomatous optic nerve head structures from SD-OCT volumes and fundus photographs , 2016 .

[12]  Suria S. Mannil,et al.  Detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a retrospective training and validation deep-learning analysis. , 2019, The Lancet. Digital health.

[13]  Na Rae Kim,et al.  Agreement of retinal nerve fiber layer color codes between Stratus and Cirrus OCT according to glaucoma severity. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  Dong Myung Kim,et al.  Topographic localization of macular retinal ganglion cell loss associated with localized peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer defect. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  R. Klein,et al.  The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study: design, methods, and baseline data. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[16]  P. Foster,et al.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Te-Won Lee,et al.  Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  J. Jonas,et al.  High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing Eye Study. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[19]  J. Jonas,et al.  Localised wedge shaped defects of the retinal nerve fibre layer in glaucoma. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Gadi Wollstein,et al.  OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[21]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.

[22]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[23]  Juan Xu,et al.  3D optical coherence tomography super pixel with machine classifier analysis for glaucoma detection , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  James E Standefer,et al.  The Glaucomas , 1958, Community eye health.

[25]  Elvira Agrón,et al.  No Sex Differences in the Frequencies of Common Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated with Age-Related Macular Degeneration , 2017, Current eye research.

[26]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness , 2018, ICLR.

[27]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[28]  J. J. Wang,et al.  The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[29]  Jean-Claude Mwanza,et al.  Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[30]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[31]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[32]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[34]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.