Craniofacial Reconstruction by a Cost-Efficient Template-Based Process Using 3D Printing

Summary: Craniofacial defects often result in aesthetic and functional deficits, which affect the patient’s psyche and wellbeing. Patient-specific implants remain the optimal solution, but their use is limited or impractical due to their high costs. This article describes a fast and cost-efficient workflow of in-house manufactured patient-specific implants for craniofacial reconstruction and cranioplasty. As a proof of concept, we present a case of reconstruction of a craniofacial defect with involvement of the supraorbital rim. The following hybrid manufacturing process combines additive manufacturing with silicone molding and an intraoperative, manual fabrication process. A computer-aided design template is 3D printed from thermoplastics by a fused deposition modeling 3D printer and then silicone molded manually. After sterilization of the patient-specific mold, it is used intraoperatively to produce an implant from polymethylmethacrylate. Due to the combination of these 2 straightforward processes, the procedure can be kept very simple, and no advanced equipment is needed, resulting in minimal financial expenses. The whole fabrication of the mold is performed within approximately 2 hours depending on the template’s size and volume. This reliable technique is easy to adopt and suitable for every health facility, especially those with limited financial resources in less privileged countries, enabling many more patients to profit from patient-specific treatment.

[1]  M Hatoko,et al.  Reduction of operating time and blood transfusion for craniosynostosis by simulated surgery using three-dimensional solid models. , 1999, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[2]  S. Sudeep,et al.  Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using Calcium Phosphate Cements Along with Titanium Mesh: Our Experience , 2015, Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery.

[3]  H. Iwamuro,et al.  Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[4]  Y Raulo,et al.  Taking Calvarial Grafts, Either Split In Situ or Splitting of the Parietal Bone Flap Ex Vivo—Tools and Techniques: V. A 9650-Case Experience in Craniofacial and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  V. Mark,et al.  A new method of cranioplasty. Technical note. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  A. Lukes,et al.  Cost-Effective Patient-Specific Intraoperative Molded Cranioplasty , 2008, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  B. Abuzayed,et al.  Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques , 2011, Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice.

[8]  J. Small,et al.  Acrylic resin for the closure of skull defects preliminary report , 1945, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Assessment of bone viability after heat trauma. A histological, histochemical and vital microscopic study in the rabbit. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  Peter Weinstock,et al.  The Current Role of Three-Dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery. , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Theodore L. Gerstle,et al.  A Plastic Surgery Application in Evolution: Three-Dimensional Printing , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  N. G. Kumar,et al.  Cranioplasty of Large Cranial Defects With Porous Polyethylene Implants , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  Joseph Shin,et al.  Craniofacial Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants Polyether Ether Ketone With Computer-Assisted Planning , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  W. Couldwell,et al.  Technique for methyl methacrylate cranioplasty to optimize cosmetic outcome , 2013, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[15]  J. Wulf,et al.  Temperature elevation during simulated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty in a cadaver model , 2010, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Meel Fatal systemic allergic reaction following acrylic cranioplasty: a case report. , 2004, Journal of clinical forensic medicine.

[17]  H. Rangarajan,et al.  Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using High Impact Methylmethacrylic Plate , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  I. Jackson,et al.  Clinical Outcome in Cranioplasty: Critical Review in Long-Term Follow-Up , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[19]  G. Rogers,et al.  Autogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implications. , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[20]  Stefan Weber,et al.  Intraoperative fabrication of patient-specific moulded implants for skull reconstruction: single-centre experience of 28 cases , 2014, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[21]  Matti J. Peltola,et al.  Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction , 2011, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.