Recent trends in diabetes-related consumer health information technology research

Diabetes-related consumer health information technology (CHIT) has been designed to facilitate self-management practices, and its use has improved health outcomes for many consumers. This analysis sought to identify tendencies in diabetes-related CHIT research from 2010-2015 to help researchers find novel research topics, periodicals, collaborators, and funding agencies and experts and lay consumers to find scholarly information. Six search engines encompassing computer science, engineering, and medicine yielded potential diabetes-related CHIT publications. Abstracts and full texts were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Information on year, periodical, periodical domain, keywords, author location, author institutions, authors, and funding agencies were collected from included publications. The screening process yielded 1551 publications. Studies were published in a core of twenty periodicals, commonly comprising medicine or technology domains. "Telemedicine" was the most frequently used keyword. Harvard University, Dr. Eirik Årsand, and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases were the most frequent author institution, author, and funding agency, respectively, associated with publications. This analysis revealed potential for novel research on the sociology and economics of diabetes-related CHIT, among other topics. A lack of collaboration between top authors in the field indicates potential for new, impactful collaborations. Ongoing bibliometric research will be necessary to assess changes in this field. The opportunity exists to inform lay consumers and researchers through bibliometric analyses of other consumer health informatics topics.

[1]  Prem Timsina,et al.  A systematic review of IT for diabetes self-management: Are we there yet? , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Ernest L Carter,et al.  A patient-centric, provider-assisted diabetes telehealth self-management intervention for urban minorities. , 2011, Perspectives in health information management.

[3]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  L. Puljak,et al.  Significance of research networking for enhancing collaboration and research productivity , 2014, Croatian medical journal.

[5]  Akshaya Kumar Biswal,et al.  An Absolute Index (Ab-index) to Measure a Researcher’s Useful Contributions and Productivity , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. , 2009, Health affairs.

[7]  Christopher G Parkin,et al.  Value of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Pattern Analysis in Improving Diabetes Outcomes , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  M. Peyrot,et al.  Aade Position Statement , 2008 .

[9]  S. Trent Rosenbloom,et al.  Patient-centered care, collaboration, communication, and coordination: a report from AMIA's 2013 Policy Meeting , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava,et al.  Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus , 2013, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.

[11]  Philip Hughes,et al.  The Global Picture , 2008 .

[12]  H. Dockrell Presidential address: the role of research networks in tackling major challenges in international health. , 2010, International health.

[13]  P. Berger,et al.  Christianity and Democracy: The Global Picture , 2004 .

[14]  C. Jackson,et al.  A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care: interactive information technology in diabetes care , 2006 .

[15]  B. Costa,et al.  Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: a review of the literature , 2009, BMC family practice.

[16]  Ivan J. Perry,et al.  Type 2 Diabetes Research Yield, 1951-2012: Bibliometrics Analysis and Density-Equalizing Mapping , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Christophe Boudry,et al.  Web 2.0 Applications in Medicine: Trends and Topics in the Literature , 2014, Medicine 2.0.

[18]  L. Whitehead,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  P. Elkin,et al.  The Role of Social Media for Patients and Consumer Health , 2011, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[20]  S. Garg,et al.  Managing diabetes in the digital age , 2015, Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology.

[21]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Use of Chronic Care Model Elements Is Associated With Higher-Quality Care for Diabetes , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[22]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[23]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  L Keoki Williams,et al.  Clinical outcomes and adherence to medications measured by claims data in patients with diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[25]  P. Stone,et al.  What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  Chris B Del Mar,et al.  Does Bradford's Law of Scattering predict the size of the literature in Cochrane Reviews? , 2012, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[27]  R. Povey,et al.  Diabetes and Healthy Eating , 2007, The Diabetes educator.

[28]  Da Tao,et al.  Does the use of consumer health information technology improve outcomes in the patient self-management of diabetes? A meta-analysis and narrative review of randomized controlled trials , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[30]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. , 2002, JAMA.

[31]  Fan Li,et al.  Mapping Publication Trends and Identifying Hot Spots of Research on Internet Health Information Seeking Behavior: A Quantitative and Co-Word Biclustering Analysis , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.