The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers

This paper is concerned with modulation and beat detection for sinusoidal carriers. In the first experiment, temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) were measured for carrier frequencies between 1 and 10 kHz. Modulation rates covered the range from 10 Hz to about the rate equaling the critical bandwidth at the carrier frequency. In experiment 2, TMTFs for three carrier frequencies were obtained as a function of the carrier level. In the final experiment, thresholds for the detection of either the lower or the upper modulation sideband (beat detection) were measured for "carrier" frequencies of 5 and 10 kHz, using the same range of modulation rates as in experiment 1. The TMTFs for carrier frequencies of 2 kHz and higher remained flat up to a modulation rate of about 100-130 Hz and had similar values across carrier frequencies. For higher rates, modulation thresholds initially increased and then decreased rapidly, reflecting the subjects' ability to resolve the sidebands spectrally. Detection thresholds generally improved with increasing carrier level, but large variations in the exact level dependence were observed, across subjects as well as across carrier frequencies. For beat rates up to about 70 Hz (at 5 kHz) and 100 Hz (at 10 kHz), beat detection thresholds were the same for the upper and the lower sidebands and were about 6 dB higher than the level per sideband at the modulation-detection threshold. At higher rates the threshold for both sidebands increased, but the increase was larger for the lower sideband. This reflects an asymmetry in masking with more masking towards lower frequencies. Only at rates well beyond the maximum of the TMTF did detection for the lower sideband start to be better than that for the upper sideband. The asymmetry at intermediate frequency separations can be explained by assuming that detection always takes place in filters centered above the stimulus spectrum. The shape of the TMTF and the beat-detection data reflects a limitation in resolving fast amplitude variations, which must occur central to the inner-ear filtering. Its characteristic resembles that of a first-order low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of about 150 Hz.

[1]  J. L. Goldstein Auditory spectral filtering and monaural phase perception. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. A. Zanten Temporal Modulation Transfer Functions for Intensity Modulated Noise Bands , 1980 .

[4]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  Detection of mixed modulation , 1980 .

[5]  E Zwicker,et al.  Inverse frequency dependence of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking patterns at low levels. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  C. Formby Modulation detection by patients with eighth-nerve tumors. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  C. Formby,et al.  Modulation threshold functions for chronically impaired Menière patients. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[10]  S. Sheft,et al.  Temporal integration in amplitude modulation detection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  S. Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[15]  Comment on "Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91,2156-2164 (1992)]. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Aleksander Sek Modulation threshlds and critical modulation frequency based on random amplitude and frequency changes , 1994 .

[17]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Detection of tones in low-noise noise : further evidence for the role of envelope fluctuations , 1997 .

[20]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  T. Dau Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation , 1997 .

[22]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  N. Viemeister,et al.  The effects of frequency region and bandwidth on the temporal modulation transfer function. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A Kohlrausch,et al.  Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  T. Dau,et al.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.