Factors associated with the use of a teleconsultation system in Brazilian primary care.

BACKGROUND The Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais (TNMG) is a public telehealth service that provides support to primary healthcare in Minas Gerais, Brazil, performing teleconsultation and tele-electrocardiography. The aim of this study was to assess teleconsultation requests received by the TNMG and to investigate the factors associated with low teleconsultation utilization in most municipalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was carried out including 214 municipalities. Indicators were defined to analyze teleconsultation requests. A structured questionnaire was used to investigate factors associated with teleconsultation utilization, which were analyzed by multivariate analysis through a decision tree algorithm (chi-squared automatic interaction detector) to the entire population of the study and logistic regression for municipalities that had used the system during the analyzed period. RESULTS From May to September 2009, 1,954 teleconsultations were performed. The average number (±standard deviation) of teleconsultations per municipality was 1.71 (±1.50) per month. The majority of the users were located in remote regions with a low Human Development Index. The decision tree showed "conduction of sufficient training" (p=0.0015) as the factor with the greatest positive impact on teleconsultation utilization, followed by "ability to discuss clinical cases outside the teleconsultation system" (p=0.0192). Logistic regression analysis revealed two factors associated with increased use of the system: "complexity of the system" (odds ratio=3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-7.09) and whether they considered that the "service helps to solve everyday problems" (odds ratio=4.37; 95% CI, 1.14-16.69). CONCLUSIONS The study of factors associated with the low use of the teleconsultation system of the TNMG may help policy makers define strategies to improve the use of teleconsultation services.

[1]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[2]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: an empirical investigation. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[4]  S. Valentine,et al.  Physicians' Adoption of Information Technology , 2001, Health marketing quarterly.

[5]  D Hailey,et al.  ELEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE APPLICATIONS , 2001, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  Teleconsultation practice guidelines: report from G8 Global Health Applications Subproject 4. , 2002, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  Penny Jennett,et al.  Organizational readiness for telemedicine: Implications for success and failure , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  Deborah Helitzer,et al.  Assessing or predicting adoption of telehealth using the diffusion of innovations theory: a practical example from a rural program in New Mexico. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Sarah Muttitt,et al.  Integrating telehealth into Aboriginal healthcare: the Canadian experience , 2004, International journal of circumpolar health.

[12]  Kendall Ho,et al.  The essence of telehealth readiness in rural communities: an organizational perspective. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  Peter M Yellowlees,et al.  Successfully developing a telemedicine system. , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[14]  T. Reardon,et al.  Research findings and strategies for assessing telemedicine costs. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[15]  N. Hjelm,et al.  Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  P. Whitten,et al.  Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. , 2005, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[17]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? , 2006, Implementation science : IS.

[18]  Davide Nicolini The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[19]  Pratim Datta,et al.  Interplay of cost and adoption of tele-medicine in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of tele-cardiology in Ethiopia , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[20]  Stefan V. Pantazi,et al.  Success factors for telehealth - A case study , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  P. Barton,et al.  Specialist physicians' knowledge and beliefs about telemedicine: a comparison of users and nonusers of the technology. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[22]  Amy K. Yarbrough,et al.  Technology Acceptance among Physicians , 2007, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[23]  M. Gagnon,et al.  A survey in Alberta and Quebec of the telehealth applications that physicians need , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[24]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  Richard Wootton,et al.  Telemedicine support for the developing world , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  Kanagasingam Yogesan,et al.  Gap analysis in telemedicine , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[27]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Provider utilization of telemedicine: the elephant in the room. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[28]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Chao Lung Wen,et al.  The National Telehealth Program in Brazil: an instrument of support for primary health care , 2009 .

[30]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Telehospice: reasons for slow adoption in home hospice care , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[31]  J. Calhoun,et al.  Changes in provider attitudes toward telemedicine. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[32]  Leonard C Gray,et al.  Telemedicine across the ages , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[33]  Kendall Ho,et al.  Telehealth in the Developing World , 2009 .

[34]  S. Buck Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: a cognitive-emotional approach , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[35]  Shariq Khoja,et al.  A systematic review of the use of telehealth in Asian countries , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[36]  Laurent Bonnardot,et al.  Store-and-forward telemedicine for doctors working in remote areas , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[37]  Clareci Silva Cardoso,et al.  Implementation of a telecardiology system in the state of Minas Gerais: the Minas Telecardio Project. , 2010, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[38]  R. Scott,et al.  Telemedicine Service Use: A New Metric , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  P. Ray,et al.  Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review , 2013, Interactive journal of medical research.