A biomechanical analysis of trunk and pelvis motion during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis compared to control subjects.

BACKGROUND Trunk lean over the stance limb during gait has been linked to a reduction in the knee adduction moment, which is associated with joint loading. We examined differences in knee adduction moments and frontal plane trunk lean during gait between subjects with knee osteoarthritis and a control group of healthy adults. METHODS Gait analysis was performed on 80 subjects (40 osteoarthritis). To define lateral trunk lean two definitions were used. The line connecting the midpoint between two reference points on the pelvis and the midpoint between the acromion processes was projected onto the lab frontal plane and the pelvis frontal plane. Pelvic tilt was also measured in the frontal plane as the angle between the pelvic and lab coordinate systems. Angles were calculated across the stance phase of gait. We analyzed the data, (i) by extracting discrete parameters (mean and peak) waveform values, and (ii) using principal component analysis to extract shape and magnitude differences between the waveforms. FINDINGS Osteoarthritis subjects had a higher knee adduction moment than the control group (α=0.05). Although the discrete parameters for trunk lean did not show differences between groups, principal component analysis did detect characteristic waveform differences between the control and osteoarthritis groups. INTERPRETATION A thorough biomechanical analysis revealed small differences in the pattern of motion of the pelvis and the trunk between subjects with knee osteoarthritis and control subjects; however these differences were only detectable using principal component analysis.

[1]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  C. Hubley‐Kozey,et al.  Explaining the hip adduction moment variability during gait: Implications for hip abductor strengthening. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  D. Winter,et al.  Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Lynn Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Proximal gait adaptations in medial knee OA , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  Characteristics of trunk lean motion during walking in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. , 2008, The Knee.

[7]  T. Miyazaki,et al.  Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Patterns of spinal motion during walking , 1997 .

[9]  T Koshino,et al.  Hip Adductor Muscle Strength in Patients With Varus Deformed Knee , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Low‐dimensional dynamical characterization of human performance of cancer patients using motion data , 2018, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  K. Deluzio,et al.  Knee biomechanics of moderate OA patients measured during gait at a self-selected and fast walking speed. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. L. Astephen,et al.  Biomechanical changes at the hip, knee, and ankle joints during gait are associated with knee osteoarthritis severity , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  Roongtiwa Vachalathiti,et al.  Age, gender and speed effects on spinal kinematics during walking , 1997 .

[15]  R Baker,et al.  Pelvic angles: a mathematically rigorous definition which is consistent with a conventional clinical understanding of the terms. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[16]  J. L. Astephen,et al.  Biomechanical features of gait waveform data associated with knee osteoarthritis: an application of principal component analysis. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[17]  K. Deluzio,et al.  Principal component models of knee kinematics and kinetics: Normal vs. pathological gait patterns , 1997 .

[18]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  The knee adduction moment during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis is more closely correlated with static alignment than radiographic disease severity, toe out angle and pain , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  Karen Hayes,et al.  Hip abduction moment and protection against medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis progression. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  M. Hunt,et al.  Lateral trunk lean explains variation in dynamic knee joint load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  A. Mündermann,et al.  Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Erik B Simonsen,et al.  Experimentally reduced hip abductor function during walking: Implications for knee joint loads. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  M. Whittle,et al.  Three-dimensional relationships between the movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during normal gait , 1999 .

[25]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[26]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[27]  T. Lu,et al.  Effects of severity of degeneration on gait patterns in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.