Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: integrated evaluation.

The aim of this paper is to present an approach for an integrated evaluation of the sustainability of pig farming systems, taking into account the three classical pillars: economy, environment and society. Eight sustainability themes were considered: Animal Welfare (AW), Animal Health (AH), Breeding Programmes (BP), Environment (EN), Meat Safety (MS), Market Conformity (MC), Economy (EC) and Working Conditions (WC). A total of 37 primary indicators were identified and used for the evaluation of 15 much contrasted pig farming systems in five EU countries. The results show that the eight themes were not redundant and all contributed to the observed variation between systems. The tool was very robust for highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the systems along the eight themes that were considered. The number of primary indicators could be reduced from 37 to 18 with limited impact on the strengths/weaknesses profile of the individual systems. Integrating the eight theme evaluations into a single sustainability score is based on hypotheses or presumptions on the relative weights that should be given to the eight themes, which are very dependent on the context and on the purpose of the users of the tool. Therefore, the present paper does not have the ambition to provide a ready-for-use tool, rather to suggest an approach for the integrated evaluation of the sustainability of pig farming systems.

[1]  M. Bonneau,et al.  Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: breeding programmes. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming , 2005 .

[3]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture , 2010 .

[4]  H. Seegers,et al.  On-farm multi-contamination of pigs by food-borne bacterial zoonotic hazards: an exploratory study. , 2011, Veterinary microbiology.

[5]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  SAFE - A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems , 2007 .

[6]  D. Houthuijs,et al.  Lung function and respiratory symptoms in pig farmers. , 1987, British journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  H. Seegers,et al.  Prevalence and Risk Factors for Bacterial Food‐Borne Zoonotic Hazards in Slaughter Pigs: A Review , 2009, Zoonoses and public health.

[8]  Jan Tind Sørensen,et al.  Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: Citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark , 2011 .

[9]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[10]  A. Kruif,et al.  A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  M. Hviid,et al.  Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: the procedure, the evaluated systems and the evaluation tools. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[12]  J Y Dourmad,et al.  Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: economy. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[13]  J. Delgado,et al.  Performances of the Iberian and other local breeds of Spain. , 2001 .

[14]  C. López-Bote Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed. , 1998, Meat science.

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  S. Padel,et al.  Sustaining animal health and food safety in European organic livestock farming , 2005 .

[17]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[18]  Claudia R. Binder,et al.  Sustainability solution space of the Swiss milk value added chain , 2012 .

[19]  Omar Masera,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. the MESMIS framework , 2002 .

[20]  J. Porcher The Relationship Between Workers and Animals in the Pork Industry: A Shared Suffering , 2011 .

[21]  H Mollenhorst,et al.  On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems , 2006, British poultry science.

[22]  J. Delgado,et al.  Performances of French local breeds. , 2001 .

[23]  J Y Dourmad,et al.  Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: development of a market conformity tool for pork products based on technological quality traits. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[24]  J. Ryschawy,et al.  Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[25]  Roberto Ruiz,et al.  An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification , 2012 .