User-preferred position of computer displays of different sizes and configurations

User-preferred position of the computer display and the keyboard were quantified to determine how the size and/or the number of computer displays (19″, 24″, 27.5″, and dual 19″ LCDs) influence the positioning of the computer workstation components. Nineteen subjects performed a data entry task for 20 minutes with periodic repositioning of the display and the keyboard to their most comfortable setting. Subjects placed displays significantly (p<0.05) further as the size of display changed from 19″ to 27.5″ while maintaining the viewing angle to the top and center of display at or near eye height. Preferred position of the keyboard was not influenced by the display size. Results of this study indicate that the dimensions or adjustability of a computer workstation should be determined with consideration of the display size to accommodate both the keyboard and the display at their most preferred positions.

[1]  S. Whittaker,et al.  Visual Requirements for Reading , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[3]  Susumu Saito,et al.  Effects of the liquid crystal display tilt angle of a notebook computer on posture, muscle activities and somatic complaints , 2002 .

[4]  J P Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  A. Spaepen,et al.  Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings , 2003, Ergonomics.

[6]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of Computer Monitor Viewing Angle and Related Factors on Strain, Performance, and Preference Outcomes , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[7]  James E. Sheedy,et al.  The Effects of Visual Display Distance on Eye Accommodation, Head Posture, and Vision and Neck Symptoms , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[8]  M. B. Villanueva,et al.  Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. , 1997, Industrial health.

[9]  Kamal Kothiyal,et al.  Effects of computer monitor setting on muscular activity, user comfort and acceptability in office work. , 2009, Work.

[10]  Arne Aarås,et al.  Work with visual display units: Long-term health effects of high and downward line-of-sight in ordinary office environments , 2006 .

[11]  J P Psihogios,et al.  A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  W Jaschinski-Kruza,et al.  Eyestrain in VDU Users: Viewing Distance and the Resting Position of Ocular Muscles , 1991, Human factors.

[13]  R. Burgess-Limerick,et al.  The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[15]  E Grandjean,et al.  VDT Workstation Design: Preferred Settings and Their Effects , 1983, Human factors.

[16]  K. Shieh,et al.  Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  W. Jaschinski.  The Proximity-Fixation-Disparity Curve and the Preferred Viewing Distance at a Visual Display as an Indicator of Near Vision Fatigue , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  H Kylian,et al.  A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[19]  S Saito,et al.  Visual comfort in VDT operation: physiological resting states of the eye. , 1993, Industrial health.