Resilience, redundancy and low-carbon living: co-producing individual and community learning

There is an acknowledged need for buildings and communities to be more resilient in the face of unpredictable effects of climate change, economic crises and energy supplies. The notion and social practices involving ‘redundancy’ (the ability to switch between numerous available choices beyond optimal design) are explored as an aspect of resilience theory. Practice and Social Learning theories are used as a lens through which to explore the available redundancy in housing and home environments to help prevent performance failure through unexpected circumstances or in response to varying user needs. Findings from an in depth UK housing case study show how redundancy is linked with the capacity to share resources and to learn both individually and collectively as a community. Such learning in relation to resilient low-carbon living is shown to be co-produced effectively through participatory action research. The benefits of introducing extra redundancy in housing design and community development to accommodate varied user’s understanding and preferences are discussed in relation to future proofing, value and scalar issues. Recommendations include better understanding of the design, time and monetary contribution needed to implement social or technical redundancy. These costs should be evaluated in context of savings made through greater resilience achieved.

[1]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[2]  Zaid Chalabi,et al.  The impact of occupancy patterns, occupant-controlled ventilation and shading on indoor overheating risk in domestic environments , 2014 .

[3]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed With a Practice Theory Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Incorporating inhabitants’ everyday practices into domestic retrofits , 2014 .

[5]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[6]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  Neil Allan,et al.  Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance , 2010 .

[8]  V. Dakos,et al.  Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services , 2012 .

[9]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[10]  S. M. Hansen Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[11]  Francesco Chiodelli,et al.  Living together privately: for a cautious reading of cohousing , 2014 .

[12]  T. Woodin,et al.  Community and mutual ownership: a historical review , 2010 .

[13]  Glen Bramley,et al.  The homelessness monitor: England 2012 , 2013 .

[14]  T. Brandsen,et al.  The Trade-Off Between Capital and Community: The Conditions for Successful Co-production in Housing , 2012 .

[15]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Resilience in the built environment , 2014 .

[16]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives , 2010 .

[17]  Bronwyn Hayward,et al.  Rethinking Resilience: Reflections on the Earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, 2010 and 2011 , 2013 .

[18]  Robert Lee,et al.  Food futures: system transitions towards UK food security , 2011 .

[19]  N. Kohler,et al.  The ideal of resilient systems and questions of continuity , 2014 .

[20]  G. Walker,et al.  Community resilience to climate change: an evidence review , 2015 .

[21]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Embedding built environments in social–ecological systems: resilience-based design principles , 2014 .

[22]  M. Hodson,et al.  Urban ecological security : the new urban paradigm , 2007 .

[23]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing , 2013 .

[24]  Karen A. Franck,et al.  New households, new housing , 1989 .

[25]  T. Schatzki The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change , 2002 .

[26]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[27]  S. Lhomme,et al.  What Resilience Is Not: Uses and Abuses , 2012 .

[28]  Ian Alexander,et al.  Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Paul Chatterton Low Impact Living: A Field Guide to Ecological, Affordable Community Building , 2014 .

[30]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future , 2010 .

[31]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[32]  R. Yin The abridged version of case study research: Design and method. , 1998 .

[33]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  User learning and practices in relation to innovative technologies: a case study of domestic photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[34]  Edgar S. Cahn,et al.  No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative , 2004 .

[35]  Lawrence J. Vale The politics of resilient cities: whose resilience and whose city? , 2014 .

[36]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Interventions in practice: re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour , 2013 .

[37]  H. Jarvis Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: evidence from the UK, USA and Australia , 2015 .

[38]  A Classification of Alternative Lifestyle Groups , 1984 .

[39]  B. Maguire,et al.  Assessing a community's capacity to manage change: A resilience approach to social assessment , 2008 .

[40]  A. Charles,et al.  Transformative learning for better resource management: the role of critical reflection , 2012 .

[41]  J. Hannaford,et al.  Testing the resilience of water supply systems to long droughts , 2012 .

[42]  Wiktoria Glad,et al.  Housing renovation and energy systems: the need for social learning , 2012 .

[43]  Peter Walker,et al.  Evaluation of the thermal performance of an innovative prefabricated natural plant fibre building system , 2013 .

[44]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[45]  Rajat Gupta,et al.  Intent and outcomes from the Retrofit for the Future programme: key lessons , 2015 .

[46]  Paul Chatterton,et al.  Towards an Agenda for Post‐carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK's First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community , 2013 .

[47]  Kevin Jiang Introduction , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[48]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  User learning and emerging practices in relation to innovative technologies: A case study of domestic photovoltaic systems in the UK , 2016 .

[49]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[50]  Vanessa Watson,et al.  Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference , 2014 .

[51]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[52]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[53]  J. Pickerill,et al.  Geographies of Sustainability: Low Impact Developments and Radical Spaces of Innovation , 2009 .

[54]  Fionn Stevenson,et al.  A Social Learning Tool - barriers and opportunities for collective occupant learning in low carbon housing , 2014 .