ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Societ

[1]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Christopher M. Kramer,et al.  Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  Appropriate use of cardiovascular technology: 2013 ACCF appropriate use criteria methodology update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Schwitter,et al.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. , 2013, European heart journal.

[5]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  D. Berman,et al.  Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Clinical expert consensus statement on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  J. Fleg,et al.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  Developing an action plan for patient radiation safety in adult cardiovascular medicine: proceedings from the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Think Tank held on February 28, 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  Developing an action plan for patient radiation safety in adult cardiovascular medicine: proceedings from the Duke University Clinical Research Institute/American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association think tank held on February 28, 2011. , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  F. Nabi,et al.  Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  S. Plein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  L. Shaw,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Electrocardiography With or Without Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) Trial , 2011, Circulation.

[16]  G. Raff,et al.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[17]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  Warren J Manning,et al.  ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  M. Gulati,et al.  Exercise in Cardiovascular Disease Exercise Stress Testing in Women Going Back to the Basics , 2010 .

[20]  Mouaz Al-Mallah,et al.  ASNC IMAGING GUIDELINES FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY PROCEDURES Single photon-emission computed tomography , 2010 .

[21]  M. Hamon,et al.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  H. Calkins,et al.  2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  D. Berman,et al.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Associa , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[26]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[27]  R. Carlos,et al.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Patricia A Pellikka,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[29]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and function: Single photon emission computed tomography , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[30]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[31]  Dan M. Roden,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines , 2006 .

[32]  R. Hendel,et al.  ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  R. Hendel,et al.  Acute resting myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the emergency room assessment of sestamibi for evaluation of chest pain (ERASE Chest Pain) trial , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[34]  E. Antman,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  G. Assmann,et al.  Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study , 2002, Circulation.

[36]  A. Morise,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[37]  Robert Califf,et al.  Value of the History and Physical in Identifying Patients at Increased Risk for Coronary Artery Disease , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[38]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Asymptomatic Ventricular Arrhythmias: The Framingham Heart Study , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  J. Jalife,et al.  Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside , 1990 .

[40]  F. Harrell,et al.  Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[41]  G. Diamond.  A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[42]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  L. Campeau.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. , 1976, Circulation.

[44]  K. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Impact of a continuous quality improvement initiative on appropriate use of coronary computed tomography angiography. Results from a multicenter, statewide registry, the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  R. Shephard.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography After Stress Testing: Results From a Multicenter, Statewide Registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium) , 2012 .

[46]  Pamela S Douglas,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for quality echocardiography laboratory operations. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[47]  S. Abbara.  SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee , 2010 .

[48]  N. Unwin,et al.  Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National , 2009 .

[49]  M. Chung,et al.  The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2009 .

[50]  B. Burnand,et al.  The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual , 2001 .