ZnO layers deposited by the ion layer gas reaction on Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin film solar cell absorbers—impact of ‘damp‐heat’ conditions on the layer properties

Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 (‘CIGSSe’) based solar cells with a ZnO window extension layer (WEL) deposited by the ion layer gas reaction (ILGAR) reach competitive efficiencies compared to corresponding references with CdS buffer and lead to a simplified device structure. The WEL replaces not only the CdS buffer, but also the undoped part of the usually applied rf-sputtered ZnO window bi-layer. The long-term stability of CIGSSe-based solar modules is currently under investigation. In order to pass the respective stability tests, which include exposure to ‘damp-heat’ (DH) conditions (85% relative humidity at 85(C) to accelerate possible aging effects, a good intrinsic material stability is required. In Reference1 it was revealed, that ILGAR-ZnO contains a certain amount of meta-stable hydroxide, which can be directly tuned by the ILGAR process parameters (number of process cycles and process temperature). In order to determine the ILGAR process parameters, which result in intrinsically stable WELs, ILGAR-ZnO/CIGSSe test structures were investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) before and after a DH-test. It was found that, induced by the DH-conditions, a continuous dehydration of the WELs together with a disintegration of the ILGAR-ZnO layers takes place. This supports an earlier suggested mechanism of a DH-induced degradation by a release of water at the most critical location in a solar cell, at the heterointerface between window and absorber. By a systematic variation of the ILGAR process parameters it was possible to reduce the hydroxide content in the ILGAR-ZnO layers resulting in intrinsically more stable samples. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Rommel Noufi,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: ACCELERATED PUBLICATION: Diode characteristics in state‐of‐the‐art ZnO/CdS/Cu(In1−xGax)Se2 solar cells , 2005 .

[2]  M. Bär,et al.  Ion layer gas reaction (ILGAR): conversion, thermodynamic considerations and related FTIR analyses , 2002 .

[3]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Zn(O,OH) layers in chalcopyrite thin-film solar cells: Valence-band maximum versus composition , 2005 .

[4]  T. Nakada,et al.  18% Efficiency Cd-Free Cu(In, Ga)Se2 Thin-Film Solar Cells Fabricated Using Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD)-ZnS Buffer Layers , 2002 .

[5]  T. Nakada,et al.  ZnO/ZnS(O,OH)/Cu(In,Ga)Se/sub 2//Mo solar cell with 18.6% efficiency , 2003, 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of.

[6]  D. Lincot,et al.  CD-free Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar modules with In2S3 buffer layer by ALCVD , 2003 .

[7]  D. Briggs,et al.  Surface Analysis by Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 2003 .

[8]  C. Fischer,et al.  Intensity calibration of an FT-IR spectrometer by heavy-ion ERDA , 2004 .

[9]  L. Stolt,et al.  Interface study of CuInSe2/ZnO and Cu(In,Ga)Se2/ZnO devices using ALD ZnO buffer layers , 2003 .

[10]  H. Muffler,et al.  High efficiency chalcopyrite solar cells with ILGAR-ZnO WEL-device characteristics subject to the WEL composition , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[11]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Interface engineering in chalcopyrite thin film solar devices , 2006 .

[12]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  ILGAR technology IV : ILGAR thin film technology extended to metal oxides , 2001 .

[13]  U. Bloeck,et al.  Cd2+∕NH3-treatment of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2: Impact on the properties of ZnO layers deposited by the ion layer gas reaction method , 2005 .

[14]  H. Muffler,et al.  A novel deposition technique for compound semiconductors on highly porous substrates: ILGAR , 2000 .

[15]  A. Jäger-Waldau,et al.  Investigations of atomic diffusion at CIGSSe/ZnSe interfaces with heavy ion elastic recoil detection analysis (HI-ERDA) , 2002 .

[16]  M. Bär,et al.  ILGAR‐ZnO Window Extension Layer: an adequate substitution of the conventional CBD‐CdS buffer in Cu(In,Ga) (S,Se)2‐based solar cells with superior device performance , 2002 .

[17]  Raghu N. Bhattacharya,et al.  18.5% Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide (CIGS) Device Using Single-Layer, Chemical-Bath-Deposited ZnS(O,OH) , 2004 .

[18]  E. Umbach,et al.  CdS and Cd(OH)2 formation during Cd treatments of Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin-film solar cell absorbers , 2003 .

[19]  V. Probst,et al.  Cu(In, Ga)(Se, S) 2 Absorbers Formed by Rapid Thermal Processing of Elemental Precursors: Analysis of Thin Film Formation and Implementation of A Large Area Industrial Process , 2003 .

[20]  R. Noufi,et al.  Properties of high-efficiency CIGS thin-film solar cells , 2005, Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005..

[21]  M. Lux‐Steiner,et al.  Replacement of the CBD-CdS buffer and the sputtered i-ZnO layer by an ILGAR-ZnO WEL: optimization of the WEL deposition , 2003 .

[22]  Yoshiaki Tanaka,et al.  Yield issues on the fabrication of 30cm×30cm-sized Cu(In,Ga)Se-based thin-film modules , 2003 .

[23]  E. Umbach,et al.  Impact of Cd2+-treatment on the band alignment at the ILGAR-ZnO/CuIn(S,Se)2 heterojunction , 2003 .

[24]  M. Bär,et al.  Spray‐ILGAR indium sulfide buffers for Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells , 2005 .