Performance appraisal : how to improve its effectiveness

Formal performance appraisal has become a widespread instrument of human resource management. Performance appraisal is a measurement of how well someone performs job-relevant tasks. These measurements can serve different organisational purposes, but the most common goal is to improve or sustain performance levels by eliciting behavioural change. The underlying assumption with regard to this tool is thus that it is able to raise the performance of a whole organisation by raising the individual performance of each employee. But what became apparent is that in practice very often performance appraisal does not fulfil its promised benefits. Reason for this lack of effectiveness was found to be lacking support by the users of the system. It became clear that their acceptance and thus their perceptions of the performance appraisal determine if the money and time spend on development and implementation was good invested or just wasted

[1]  C. Lee Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[2]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES AND THE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EFFECTIVENESS , 1982 .

[3]  R. Goffin,et al.  Can performance-feedback accuracy be improved? Effects of rater priming and rating-scale format on rating accuracy. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  PERFORMANCE-RELATED AND SKILL-BASED PAY: AN INTRODUCTION , 1998 .

[5]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Continuing Improvements Following the Implementation of a Performance-Based Compensation Plan , 1999 .

[6]  Jeffrey D. Facteau,et al.  Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable , 2001 .

[7]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Distributional Ratings of Performance: More Evidence for a New Rating Format , 1997 .

[8]  Saundra J. Reinke Does the Form Really Matter? , 2003 .

[9]  Aharon Tziner,et al.  Effects of Performance Appraisal Format on Perceived Goal Characteristics, Appraisal Process Satisfaction, and Changes in Rated Job Performance: A Field Experiment , 1993 .

[10]  Sheldon Zedeck,et al.  EXPECTATIONS OF BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES , 1980 .

[11]  M. Podgursky,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Performance-Based Compensation. , 2000 .

[12]  Gary E. Roberts Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation: A Technique That Works , 2002 .

[13]  R. Cordero,et al.  Favoritism, Bias, and Error in Performance Ratings of Scientists and Engineers: The Effects of Power, Status, and Numbers , 2001 .

[14]  Lawrence M. Rudner Reducing Errors Due to the Use of Judges , 1992 .

[15]  Hannah R. Rothstein,et al.  Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. , 1990 .

[16]  R. Kopelman,et al.  Is there a Preferred Performance Rating Format? A Non-psychometric Perspective , 2002 .

[17]  Keith Leavitt,et al.  Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: can groups help? , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Scott Parrill REVISITING RATING FORMAT RESEARCH: COMPUTER-BASED RATING FORMATS AND COMPONENTS OF ACCURACY , 1999 .

[19]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Employee selection , 2021, Dark Personalities in the Workplace.

[20]  Michael J. Kavanagh,et al.  Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: comparison of three methods of performance appraiser training , 1988 .

[21]  M. Buckley,et al.  The Impact of Rating Scale Format on Rater Accuracy: An Evaluation of the Mixed Standard Scale , 1988 .

[22]  M. Cook Performance appraisal and true performance , 1995 .

[23]  Charmine Härtel,et al.  Rating format research revisited: format effectiveness and acceptability depend on rater characteristics , 1993 .

[24]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSES , 1977 .

[25]  M. Trost,et al.  Effects of category prototypes on performance-rating accuracy. , 1995 .

[26]  Gerald T. Gabris,et al.  Does Performance Appraisal Contribute to Heightened Levels of Employee Burnout? The Results of One Study , 2001 .

[27]  Maxine A. Dalton Multirater feedback and conditions for change. , 1996 .

[28]  Nambury S. Raju,et al.  Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. , 1998 .

[29]  R. Martell,et al.  A comparison of the behavioral rating accuracy of groups and individuals , 1993 .

[30]  J. Matthew,et al.  EVALUATING INSTRUCTOR/EVALUATOR INTER-RATER RELIABILITY FROM PERFORMANCE DATABASE INFORMATION , 1999 .

[31]  C. Harris A Comparison of Employee Attitudes toward Two Performance Appraisal Systems , 1988 .

[32]  Juan I. Sanchez,et al.  A second look at the relationship between rating and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal. , 1996 .